Will there be a Second BREXIT Referendum? Save for later Reblogpost

Plague_Doctor
@Plague_Doctor

Send Private MessageSubscribe31

A day after a successful Brexit referendum on June 24, 2016, David Cameron resigned leaving the responsibilities of making good on the promise of carrying out Brexit in the hands of Theresa May. Theresa May promised a ‘better Britain’:

“A vision of a country that works not for the privileged few but that works for every one of us because we’re going to give people more control over their lives and that’s how, together, we will build a better Britain.”

Theresa May and Broken Promises

May was quick to break her promise and delivered nothing, quite the contrary actually May successfully undermined the Brexit deal by not just catering but simply submitting to the European Union. Naturally, it was never about the British people. How could it have been? Theresa May has a clear conflict of interest due to including but not limited to her husband – through whom the situation can be very well illustrated – , Philip May who is a political advisor and an investment relationship manager. He had previously been a fund manager for de Zoete & Bevan, Prudential Portfolio Managers, and Deutsche Asset Management. Philip’s Capital Group is the largest shareholder of BAE Systems, an arms manufacturer, which greatly benefited from the illegal missile strikes against Syria having manufactured the missiles themselves. Capital Group has $1.87 trillion under management. The threat of Brexit eroding even a minuscule portion of that must even in the short-term be giving them shivers just thinking about it. As David Icke put it Theresa May, just like David Cameron was, is a here-today-gone-tomorrow politician ready to be replaced at any moment by another figurehead of the establishment.

The United Kingdom with a population around 66 million, which is just a million shy of that of France, at the same time newspapers and media outlets are happy to propagate fear porn concerning Northern Ireland and its status after a theoretical no-deal Brexit. The United Kingdom is big enough and strong enough, aside from being the financial center of the European continent, to enter into new bi-and multilateral trade agreements with other countries. Germans would still be happy to sell their cars to the UK after Brexit and French companies would not take an issue with more British orders of aircraft parts. Other than Northern Ireland other issues, such as national defense, border control, trade, employment in the European Union were cited as critical fields concerning Brexit by the media. At the same time, both the EU and British diplomats failed to enter into negotiations of any substance. It would be quite difficult to assume that anything would change after such an event as Brexit as things currently stand.

It would be an understatement to call the Brexit talks prolonged, or even tedious because they can only be compared to Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV’s “Humiliation of Canossa”.

As it stands Brexit itself is being constantly delayed either by Theresa May or by the British Parliament. The Brexit people voted for back in 2016 has morphed into a different beast. It was also revealed during last summer that even if the United Kingdom ever left the European Union the EU’s jurisdiction would still apply to the UK. It would effectively make it possible for the EU to enact new legislation in the future, without the participation or the approval of British MEPs, which is going to have a direct effect on the lives of British people living in the UK.

Behind the Blue Iron Curtain

From the start, it was quite obvious to anyone to see that it was the European Union who dictated Brexit talks with itself. An EU which is looking at Brexit as a life-threatening issue which could have the force to erode the “European project” stopping “the breaking of proud Europe” masquerading as an economic union. This so-called “economic union” turned out much harder to leave for Britain than it was for many Eastern European countries to leave the Soviet Union. While the Soviet Union was using mostly overt means, tanks, and Soviet soldiers, the European Union is using subversion, propaganda, fear tactics on all levels, political, cultural shaming, economic terrorism, and other covert means to get the people in line and get other states to do the bidding of the European “elite”, the financial oligarchs of a heavily-bureaucratized cleptocracy.

By submitting to the European Union Theresa May intends to serve the British liberal elite, which is neither British nor liberal. Britain’s cosmopolite elite has more in common if the “elites” of the United States, Spain, Germany, Russia, Ukraine, Brazil than its own countrymen and they chose to be as much of liberals as it fits their pockets.

It is quite obvious that the stage is tilted. In all member countries and even abroad, nationalist and semi-nationalist government especially prior to national elections are being constantly shamed for their political views.

The Status Quo is Here to Stay

After such a long very general introduction to the topic, the United Kingdom with a population around 66 million, which is just a million shy of that of France, at the same time newspapers and media outlets are happy to propagate fear porn concerning Northern Ireland and its status after a theoretical no-deal Brexit. The United Kingdom is big enough and strong enough, aside from being the financial center of the European continent, to enter into new bi-and multilateral trade agreements with other countries. Germans would still be happy to sell their cars to the UK after Brexit and French companies would not take an issue with more British orders of aircraft parts. Other than Northern Ireland other issues, such as national defense, border control, trade, employment in the European Union were cited as critical fields concerning Brexit by the media. At the same time, both the EU and British diplomats failed to enter into negotiations of any substance. It would be quite difficult to assume that anything would change after such an event as Brexit as things currently stand.

Just a few hours ago Theresa May came out with the third version of the supposed ‘Brexit deal’ on which the British parliament is going to vote. Representatives of the EU are claiming that it’s the last chance of the UK to leave the EU and they do not intend to discuss further versions of this deal. They have already announced a “Withdrawal agreement” which will be legally binding and a non-binding 26-page document on the future relationship between the UK and the EU.

They have already agreed on a so-called ‘transition period’ after 29 March 2019, to 31 December 2020 (there is a possibility for it to be extended) during which the UK will have the chance to broker out its own trade deals and change/abolish EU legislation both of which will enter into force after the transition period.

Due to the current deal’s state and the fact that it requires parliamentary approval it is still possible for British MPs to force Theresa May back to the drawing board and also to call for a new referendum on Brexit.

Has the public been prepared?

The issue of another Brexit referendum is in the hands of the UK elite, a group of cosmopolitan globalists who have little connection with their countrymen. They are the ones who are bankrolling British political campaigns, providing funds for civic organizations and controlling Britain’s vast structure of corporations including the media. Since Brexit is being regarded as a destabilizing, bullish force, a potential adversary of British stocks the United Kingdom leaving the European Union might cause unwanted turbulences for this globalist superclass sitting above the classless society.

It is rather a recurring theme of EU referendums that if the results of those referendums aren’t deemed satisfactory by the European elite and its bureaucrats the people are scolded and made to vote again, correctly this time. Sometimes referendums with such results are being completely ignored.

It’s all about pushing the same old globalist agenda in order to create the United States of Europe or the Soviet European Union. The European Union costs £1,000 billion a year for the member nations – an incredible £2,000 for every man, woman, and child in Europe (source). So what do people get for their money? More big government, more surveillance, and more, often meaningless, regulations including one on the union-sanctioned sizes and shapes of bananas.

A Second Brexit Referendum

Until they cannot find a sure way to end Brexit or make it a complete sham, the political elite of Britain will attempt to prolong talks and use fear tactics on the public. A second Brexit referendum is likely if the European ‘elite’ deems it probable enough that on such an occasion the British people will vote ‘stay’ making it a surefire way of stopping Brexit in its tracks.