I found a new demographic law. Actually Turd Flinging Monkey found it, I just realized he had found it. It’s a new law of biology. Here’s how I realized TFM had found a new demographic law of biology: I was listening to TFM talking about how Denmark was going extinct….listen to his videos. People are not having babies in Denmark. Why was that? Then I realized all the other things TFM had said on this subject, so I put it together and wrote it down, the best I could. It’s a new law. Here is is:
Turd’s Law states that, the closer a country gets to economic equality between men and women, the more likely the country is, to go demographically extinct. Turd’s Law is a derivative law, implied by the law of female hyper-gamy: women only marry up. Hyper-gamy has it’s roots in human evolution. We are a sexually dimorphic species. Men are bigger than women. Men have bigger muscles than women. Pregnancy make a woman vulnerable for a long time. This causes women to chose mates who can protect them: physically, then financially in the modern world. Dominance Hierarchies are real. Women respond to them. All women want to marry “UP” a dominance hierarchy. As societies become more equal, more women compete directly with men, in the Dominance Hierarchy for economics. Trouble is, women only marry up. That’s textbook hyper-gamy 101…. This means mathematically, logically, as women start competing with men for power, the fewer mate choices women have. So the closer societies get to gender equality, the fewer children they have. If social equality is reached, so few children are born, that the society dies off.
That’s Turd’s Law.
This law is certainly true in Denmark.
…..Now that Turd’s Law has been found, Women now have 2 choices:
Choice 1: Economic equality in pay between men and women, but no future, because women have no babies, so your country dies off.
Choice 2: Economic inequality between men and women, women have babies, the country lives.
Pick one….because you can’t pick both. One choice excludes the other.
What is the root of this? Hyper-gamy. Women only want to “marry up” economically. They only want babies with men who earn more money than they do. It’s part of evolution.
Mathematically, statistically, the closer you get to economic equality, the fewer men are available, who are higher in status than the women, for the women to have babies with. This is nothing you can tell people and they will rationally respond to the information. This is something that is deeply instinctive. Once you set the social rules, people respond to those rules. Men do. Women do…..all based on innate biology. And it leads to this conclusion: Once “equality” between men and women is achieved, the country dies.
The only thing keeping America alive, is the gender pay gap. Inequality keeps societies alive, especially economic inequality between men and women…..However, for America this is bad news: For men and women under 35 in America….the only population young enough to have children….women already earn more money than men. Oh, oh….That’s why the fertility rate is the lowest in our history. America is dying, because feminists are winning.
Then in the news recently that idiot Trump brags that most of the new jobs he created, have gone to women. I like Trump, I support him, for most things, but he’s a moron on this issue of men, women and money. He thinks women working and out-competing men in their 20s will help America. Wrong. It will kill it.
He sides with feminists because his precious little spoiled rich daughter Ivanka is a feminist. Bad choice. Ivanka is a spoiled Princess. What works for extremely rich upper class women, won’t work for other women, who can’t afford nannies and expensive perks. Women like Ivanka are destroying America, by encouraging men and women to strive to become equal. The reason competing with men works with Ivanka, but not other women: Ivanka is already rich, she has her hyper-gamous instincts satisfied because her husband is rich, so she feels no need to “marry up”….she already is “up”. Her hyper-gamy has been satisfied, so she has children, plus career. Rich women are affected in a different way than most women. That’s because there is no “up” for these women. They are already at the top of the hyper-gamous hierarchy. Both they and their men are at or near the top of the Dominance Hierarchy.
We see evidence of the success of this pattern, in the real world: We see this in the stability of upper-middle class marriage, as Charles Murray has written books about. It’s why marriage for top women is fairly secure and stable…..but abysmal for most women. Female hyper-gamy has been satisfied at the high end of the economic level, the Ivanka level, so there is no “UP” for them to go to. So they are in stable marriages. However, 80% of women are not even remotely in that position…..so marriage for the bottom 80% of women is abysmal and unsuccessful: We now have the lowest marriage rate in American history, the lowest overall fertility rate in American history….and very high divorce rates for the bottom economic 80% of women. We are faced with a dilemma if we really wish equality for women: Most of the masses of American women wish to marry up. They are unhappy that they earn more than the men who are available to them. Since these women, which is the majority of women, they often now out-compete their own men economically, there is plenty of “UP” for them. Plenty of “UP” ….in the Dominance Hierarchy/Hyper-gamy Pyramid for these women. So they feel compelled to keep climbing the Dominance Hierarchy, to find a better man. Trouble is, women are roughly equal to men, so as women become financially successful, and many men are out-competed, there are fewer and fewer men for these women, the more these women find success. That means marriage for most women is unstable, as women become financially equal to men, thanks to feminism.
…..oooops….that’s not how this was supposed to turn out!
So women competing with men economically doesn’t work, if you want your country to have a future. And by future, I mean children and grandchildren. The closer a society gets to gender equality in terms of money, the closer they are to extinction: Turd’s Law.
Feminists don’t understand evolution, don’t understand hyper-gamy, don’t understand math, don’t understand logic, don’t understand demographic trends. They are ruining America, without realizing their destruction.
However, we should cut feminists a bit of slack because:
This is all new to humans. It came about because of the creation of the modern world, which allowed human females for the first time, to economically out-compete men. That changes everything. Never in human history or evolution, have we faced a situation where our economic system is at war with our evolutionary instincts as humans. Never before have women in large numbers been able to economically out-compete men. We all assumed this would work. Men did. Women did. However: Will this new arrangement work? That’s unlikely. It conflicts with evolved female hyper-gamy, which has been part of the human social equation, since we were in trees.
By the way, don’t expect women to fix this. They are genetically incapable of fixing this. They run on emotion and hyper-gamy as an operating system. Men don’t. If men don’t fix this, if men don’t impose a solution on women, we die off. Simple as that. There is no “working things out with women”. There is no “listening to her opinion and being fair”. There is no “equality”. There is no “explain this to women and she will be reasonable.” Those options don’t exist because that’s not how women are wired.
Related to this, is European altruism. We evolved as a society….perhaps with biological roots explaining much of why this is so, to embrace altruism….we like to treat everyone equally…this includes women, men from other races. This is how that plays out in the real world:
We gave women the vote, they voted for political parties that promote open borders and welfare. This leads to endlessly spiraling increases in the size of government, plus demographic changes that eventually causes populations who support feminism and equality for women, to go extinct….that’s where this is heading.
Now we are faced with some pretty curious biological consequences to embracing the equality of men and women. For instance: Men pay 70% of all taxes in advanced countries. That means: White European men pay money, for Muslim men to come to their countries, collect welfare, breed with their women. In Germany the gov’t even prints manuals for how Muslim men can have sex with German women. Muslims come from a very Patriarchal society, with a religion that suppresses female rights, from a society that encourages women to breed when young and have large families. Like all humans, Muslims respond to financial incentives.
This means, when she gets pregnant, other non-Muslim German men will go to work, to pay for the Muslim men to raise the children, that will replace European men.
So, maybe we should stop just blaming Muslims for our problems, which are largely created by our own choices? Hostility to Muslims never solved anything…..
Serious question: Will feminism turn out to be compatible with democracy? That’s unlikely, in my opinion. Here’s why: 80% of women in their 20s vote Democrat in the U.S. That’s because young women are wired to be looked after. Men gave women the vote. Once men gave women the vote, women voted themselves more rights, more money, without paying their own bills….since men pay most of the bills. This means power transfers from the productive men, to the women they produce for. Women control about 80% of consumer purchases in the economy. So this means those that produce the wealth are controlled by those who spend the wealth, but don’t create it. And women now vote. And this also means ultimate political control is in the hands of women, not men. This is already pretty much in alignment with feminism, of female dominance over men. Conclusion: White Men enslaved themselves….politically, economically, by giving women the vote.
We became a feminist society, by giving women the vote. Nothing will change that, unless we take away the vote from women. And if we don’t take away the vote from women, we will achieve economic equality between men and women, which will lead to our extinction.
As the old saying goes: “We are between a rock…..and a hard place”
One attached curiosity: Arab men did not introduce concepts into the world, like “democracy” and “giving women the vote”… Black Men didn’t do this either. Chinese men didn’t do this, either. Japanese men didn’t do this, but after white men nuked them in WWII, white men imposed on Japan, voting rights for women.
Guess which societies are going extinct? Guess which are not? Guess which type of man is going extinct, which is not…..take your time. Think about it. Feel free to “Phone a friend”….Alex Trebek won’t mind!
Will women fix this? Never. There is only way to fix this: impose a solution on everyone. Once men impose a solution, women will go along with it, be happy with it, then blame men for not imposing a solution on them, earlier. Once men take women’s rights away, women will bitch that men didn’t do it earlier, causing women to suffer.
Final note: The reason why TFM is right about taking women’s voting rights away, is that hyper-gamy is real. That’s the root of the trouble. We have to align our social structures, to biological reality, or we go extinct. When you give wahmen the vote, society starts to change, men and women become more and more “equal”. And the more “equality” there is, between men and women…..the lower your birth rate….till eventually it is so low, you go extinct…..like Denmark.
Denmark is one of the first countries to achieve “equality” between men and women. Congratulations to the Danes. That means: they will now be one of the first to go extinct. It’s a new law of demographics that TFM has stumbled on. So the biological root of what TFM is talking about, is hyper-gamy. A society arranged around the feminist ideas of “equality” sets in motion changes, which conflict with evolved female hyper-gamy. That’s why feminism will never work. We get rid of it, or it will end us. So, other than destroying advanced technological societies, destroying Europe, America etc….other than that, feminism is a good idea.
I realize my opinion will piss off a lot of people. I don’t care. I only care: is it right, or not?
My hope is that I’m wrong. I’m rooting for that!
I believe in diversity of speech. I believe in diversity of opinion.
The best reason for diversity of speech, is that reality is more complex, than any one of us. If we are to survive, we need to understand reality in more complex ways. Global warming is an example. It’s counter-intuitive, it endangers us, but can only be understood by complex evidence. I think feminism is destroying us. Am I right? All opinions should be aired, so we can figure out reality, to survive.
Am I wrong? I might be. If I’m wrong: Prove it.
As Marcellus said in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark”
Cheers….enjoy your day.