The Point Of “Purity Spiraling” Save for later Reblog
A friend of mine from back when, who considers himself an unironic Neo Nazi, often rages about “purity spiraling” within the European Nationalist movement. For example, when I shit on Christians or someone denounces support for a mixed-race person who says “based” things, he gets pissed at them for “infighting”.
He even once tried to make the argument that those pro-white minorities could maybe be allowed to stay when “we win” — a self-proclaimed Neo Nazi said this.
This reflects a huge problem that has been plaguing the nationalist movement for a while now, and I first mentioned in my “Be Not Beguiled By Based Minorities” article: The idea that if someone has the right mindset, then they should be seen as “one of our guys™”.
While it’s certainly true that we presently do not have completely ideal people to rally behind in the mainstream, and we can leverage them for our cause, the reality is that if you don’t draw clear lines about what is acceptable of and representative of the movement, then you allow the movement to be corrupted.

You must remember that this is exactly what happened to conservatism.
As they lost power over the nation, they started to see people who had traits about themselves that were completely antithetical to what conservatism stood for, but they were “the best we have right now”, as “one of us”. So, people threw their support behind these people, and now, after a few decades — gay black dudes who support drag-queen story hour are “Conservatives” now.

Christians who just care about Christianity, gays who just care about anal sex with other men, etc. who throw their hats in with us, do so simply because they understand that they will definitely lose any tolerance toward what they do without a white majority country.
This is different from advocating for us actually having our own homes, and it leaves the backdoor wide open for all this shit to happen again even if we “win” the culture war. It is clear that the “purity spiraling” accusation is largely just something people who are sympathetic to or partake in socially-destructive indulgences and ideologies use to shut down legitimate criticisms about their compatibility and utility to the cause. Arguing with these people about the consequences of their beliefs is not “infighting”, because their beliefs aren’t in line with the movement’s goal.
What all white nationalists must understand is that winning the culture war means winning it for our descendants, for all times. The only people we could put in power who will do this, are straight, fully-white, non-christian, anti-zionist/names the Jew, anti-democracy, and willing-to-repatriate-these-foreigners (and that includes Jews, Nick Fuentes) leaders. Full stop. They need to check all the boxes.
Accepting anything else as “good enough” or seeing them as “our guys™” is leaving ourselves open to a never-ending cycle of globalism, and with enough tries, they’ll eventually claim victory eternal.
We cannot let that happen. So while the anti-immigration, pro-white Christians, gays, minorities, etc. may be useful to the movement, that does not mean they should be seen as part of the movement itself — because before too long, we’ll be the Cuckservatives 2.0


There are no comments yet on 'The Point Of “Purity Spiraling”'