I remember back in 2008, there was this weird recession that happened in America, but for some reason, affected everyone else. At the time, of course, I was too young to understand or even really care about it that much.
Well, the truth is it’s because the attempt to combat the unending evil of “racism” was to blame.
Basically, they made it so that blacks and latinos — who are high-risk for mortgages because you know why — would now be getting those mortgage loans. The future governor of New York, who is presently subjugating his people to one of the world’s most-retarded lockdowns, said it was the right thing to do to fight evil racists but even he admitted it would lead to more foreclosures. Barack Obama, who would later become President right after Bush gave that big bailout, lead some of these protests in the 90s to get Jews to stick blacks with mortgages we all know they can’t pay.
You all know what happened next. However, the media went from championing these affirmative action policies in the 90s and 2000s, to bitching that the racist banks “preyed” on black people by giving them loans they couldn’t afford.
Everyone involved, especially the media, wiped their hands clean and their roles forgotten by the public.
Now, we see that the media and globalist organizations are doing the same thing with the COVID-19 hoax. Although, I see the Washington Times has at least admitted it’s the “largest political hoax in history“. I dunno, I still say there’s something else that’s bigger than it, but I digress.
Today, WHO is praising Sweden’s no-lockdown model.
Two weeks ago, they demanded that Sweden lock everything down or it would be an apocalypse.
The same phenomena can be witnessed on the subject of China. Just a few months ago, the media was promoting anti-racist propaganda; today, they all seem to be promoting “this is China’s fault”. If I didn’t know better, I might say there is an agenda at work here.
You know that whole “Hanlon’s Razor” thing? Where he said “Never assume malevolence where stupidity is adequate”?
At what point do we consider that maybe he had that backwards?