TURD FLINGING MONKEY’S VIDEO DARK LORDS OF THE APOCALYPSE, WHICH I WAS TALKING ABOUT IN THIS BLOG COMMENT, TFM’S VIDEO WAS DELETED BY YOU TUBE, IF YOU WANT TO SEE IT, IT’S ON BITCHUTE. CLICK LINK TO BITCHUTE HERE:
I don’t think gynocentrism will last long. The reason is technology. Men are playing the role we now play because our current level of technology is such that it requires many men to do so, to keep the baby machines….women….alive. What happens when the robots do most of the things men now do…keep the baby machines alive? Freedom for men. We are becoming less, the disposable utility of women, thanks to technology. Men can concentrate on self-improvement, self-mastery, self-actualization….and less on keeping women alive. Our slavery for women is coming to an end.
This is epic. We can end the Biblical curse that God placed on Adam:
To Eve God said: Your desire will be for your husband,
and he will rule over you.”
To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’“Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil you will eat food from it
all the days of your life.
It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return.”Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living.”
The Bible is pretty accurate in it’s depiction of the basic plot of life and of the male female roles. As the Bible describes them, so the basic human condition has been, till now. The basic human biblical narrative: Men have been cursed, to work all his life, to keep women alive. That was the gyno-centric curse of God on man, on Adam. It contains a Patriarchal code: Adam was to rule over Eve. as the price she paid, for his help. Here’s my speculation: Perhaps that curse will end, with technology.
Part of the curse is the pain of labor, with men being the disposable utility of women, with women cursed with childbirth. Both sides, male and female, are cursed, based on their biology. Only a naive fool looks at the story and says, well that didn’t happen. Stories are not based on literal reality, but they represent something that is true. They are very much like poetry. They reveal things, by making things up. The reason the story, while not literally true, is obviously true in a emblematically true sense, is that it is true from an underlying evolutionary sense. The curse is two way and is essentially a complimentary genetic compact between the sexes, with benefits and payoffs and prices to pay, for both sexes. Feminists of course, have a completely unrealistic view of this deal, the accompanying payoffs and the need for them…..and the reason for the curses. The curse came with an intractable part of the deal: men were to rule over woman. This of course makes sense. Responsibility must be wedded to authority, for it to work, because it is a genetic deal, and trade-offs are unavoidable in a sexually dimorphic species. However, feminism has tossed out the essential basics of that deal. Men are willing to sign up to look after women, but not if they get nothing out of the deal. After all, men have always sacrificed their lives for women. That sacrifice must be compensated for it to be worth it, for men to do. Feminists no longer want women to pay the natural price for what men do for women: the price is male authority over women. They want male slavery in keeping women alive, but without male authority. Sorry, but no sale…..Male slavery and sacrifice for women, with no payoff for males, is simply a very bad deal for men. A payoff of authority for males is essential for a fair deal between the sexes. That payoff has ended and few people noticed it. Many men are now starting to notice the obvious: By ending male authority we have ended the legitimacy of the biological deal between the sexes. How so? Women were given the vote and now men have lost all authority, right at the time that technology is developing, which will free men from slavery to women. There may be a silver lining to all this: Perhaps with enough technology developing, men will be freed from both having to rule over women and from having to toil to keep woman alive. One thing is for sure: the basic human genetic compact between men and women is in play, thanks to technology developing and democracy arising. We can only speculate, where this will end.
There are hopeful signs today: The marriage rate is dropping like a rock. That’s good. Why is this happening? Men are catching on, the marriage deal is no good any more. Another sign: Almost half of babies in America are born out of wedlock. That means it is no longer necessary for men to marry the Mother of his children. Men don’t want to marry because the deal is bad for men. So they don’t want to sign up for life, as the price to be paid, for having a family. That means men now have the option of having a family with fewer string attached. This means: More freedom for men, less working for women. Marriage was of course, originally a religious structure, it was really developed to enforce male enslavement, in the Biblical pattern….for the benefit of women. Variations of the same deal existed in all cultures and religions, so obviously all humans figured out the basic genetic deal between men and women and they expressed it in their culture and religion. Different religions, different cultures, same basic underlying narrative, same underlying biological reality, so all cultures came to the same basic conclusion: Give males authority over women, so men would sacrifice their lives to keep women alive. It reflected a genetic deal, where the male slaved for the woman and ruled over her. In exchange, she gave him sex and children. It’s how we humans survived. It was a human universal in all cultures….which tells me the Biblical narrative was never meant to be literally true, just biologically true. This deal was necessary in a low technology society. However, with technology now changing and developing quickly, marriage or even general lifetime pair bonding based on the enslavement of males in a social contract, that will end.
Another hopeful sign that male enslavement to women is ending, is gay marriage. How is it a hopeful sign? Think of it this way: Straight marriage was based on a few key assumptions: 1-marriage was between two people. 2-marriage was between a man and a woman. 3-marriage was for a lifetime. Of the three key assumptions of straight marriage, one of the pillars of marriage that has been knocked out by gay marriage: the pillar of marriage being between a man and a woman. Question: if we can end one of the basic 3 pillars, why not the others? There is no longer any reason why this should not be so. We can thank our gay brothers for helping free us. Now we can ask: Why can’t marriage be between several people? Humans evolved as polygamous for much of our past, so why not? And what about modern marriage as a lifetime institution? That is obviously already a thing of the past. With a 50% divorce rate, the fairy tale story of marriage as a lifetime institution ended long ago. However, men still have to catch up to women, when it comes to cynicism and looking after themselves in marriage. It’s women who file for divorce 80% of the time…not men. We need to catch up to women, in this regard. As we become less gynocentric, we can do that. Doing the math, if men filed for divorce as often as women do, the natural divorce rate may be over 70%. We still pay lip service to that lie of lifetime marriage, but no one really believes it any more. So I see all these signs as hopeful signs. The death of marriage means the death of male enslavement, to serve as gynocentric cogs in the social order to keep women alive. As technology develops, destroying marriage becomes possible….and perhaps inevitable. That is a good thing that will free men up. Men should celebrate the death of marriage, for it means the freedom of modern man. Perhaps if a male friend of yours gets divorced, you should hold a celebration party for him. He has been somewhat freed from gynocentric slavery.
Technology brings comfort and material resources to people. Comfort and material resources have unexpected implications: The more people get, in terms of comfort and material resources, the more demanding they get, the less they are willing to tolerate anything they don’t like. This is true for both men and women. The more women get, the pickier about men they get. The better the life a male has, the pickier he gets about sacrificing his life for a woman. Mgtow are just early birds, unwilling to settle for a second rate life, as slave to a wife. No wife, happy life. Mgtow want freedom, control over their lives, not enslavement. Mgtow is a positive thing. Brag about being mgtow. Brag to your friends, what a great time you are having, what a great life you are having. Your married friend’s wives will hate you of course. You bring news of freedom to the enslaved. The best way to spread the movement is to have a great life and brag about it to your married friends at every opportunity. Both feminism and mgtow are signs of technological improvement and affluence….and the accompanying shift in behavior and attitudes that technology brings:
Male happiness has actually increased since 2nd Wave Feminism came in, according to “The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness”….available online, link:
It says that female happiness is steadily declining since the 70s, while male happiness is increasing. Question: Why are women getting more and more miserable? Why are young women today less likely to be happy, than their Mothers and Grandmothers? In a word: feminism. In a few words: My guess is, as women leave their normal evolutionary pattern of having children in their 20s, and they work instead, they get miserable. Male happiness is increasing because as technology gets better, it gives men more freedom, less drudgery than men had to put up with, in the past….to keep women alive. If you ever want to understand this, take a tour of an abandoned coal mine some day. You can see up close the brutal work men put up with, for the benefit of women. That wasn’t that long ago. A few old men remember the old men who slaved for women in that time. Already today we can see that men are doing far less drudgery for women than they did a few generations back, because technology is displacing our need for it. This is making men happier and freeing men.
Unfortunately we have made several strategic mistakes that increased female unhappiness. The biggest mistake so far was embracing the feminist fairy tale of equality and getting women in advanced countries to economically compete with men, during their 20s, instead of making babies, as nature intended. Sexual freedom has been good for many men. With sexual liberation and birth control and social media and access to endless sexual partners, the cost of sex has dropped remarkably in my lifetime. So technology and feminism has meant that men win, women lose, so far. As a man, I win under feminism.
That gives me mixed feelings and a moral conundrum: I suppose I could be a complete asshole and support feminism….since I win under feminism and women lose. But I actually care about women, I know feminism is generally bad for them and makes them miserable, so I’d rather tell them why exactly they are miserable cunts, who were sold a bill of goods by lesbian man-hating professors.
Feminism has not figured out yet, the obvious: feminism makes women miserable, because it removes women from their biological norms which are essential for female happiness. Women are happiest when they are safe and secure. They are generally happiest when they are young and have lots of women and little children around, in a small localized community. There are exceptions but most women fit this pattern. I know dozens of women age 60 to 80 and one general comment I keep hearing repeated is “I was happiest when I was young, didn’t have to work, and had young children at home.”….This pattern is embedded in their bones, by evolution. Women are the least happy when they have no security, when they must compete with men for resources and status..in other words, when the idiotic patterns of feminism are played out in the world, it makes women miserable. Remember the TV show “Sex and the City”???…Candace Bushnell, the creator was interviewed recently. The Candace Bushnells of the world….old white childless women…. tend to be miserable and make poor role models….as she recently admitted. The reason they are poor role models is they are miserably unhappy women. They followed the feminist formula for their lives. Now they are old and miserable. On TV, Carrie Bradshaw had the dream life, for a feminist woman. In real life, her life was shit in the long run. Why so? Integrating the genders and having women work instead of being mothers, doesn’t work….it leaves women miserable in the long run. For all of human history, this quest for female happiness was pursued with a sensible biological division of labor in all populations: It meant a general separation of the genders into separate spheres…the male and the female….with the male playing a supporting role, creating the conditions where women could have their children when young, free from having to compete with men. That’s natural and leads to female happiness. What’s not natural is feminism. It’s out of whack with nature and evolution. These normal pair bonding and child rearing patterns have been broken by modern life and by feminism….and women are miserable, for it.
Even the old cows on The View were forced to admit the truth of this:
Mgtow is an intuitive thing. Some of the brightest men are intuiting that the days of male servitude to women is drawing to a close, so they are now embracing freedom and personal development. However in TFM’s video at the top, he talks too much about destroying our gyno-centric world. I don’t agree. All this end of the world stuff is bullshit. Sure the world is unfair to men….brutally unfair to men in many ways. But there is no need to chose between the green button and the red button. Yes, we are very gynocentric as a society. But is Social Darwinism the answer? Allowing society to collapse? Is that the answer? I say: No need for it. Why not? Because: Technology gives men freedom. Think of it this way: In the original American colonies, about 98% of the population were farmers. Today less than 2% of Americans are farmers….and we have far more food, than we did back then, with the 98%. That’s how technology works. As Bob Dylan sang long ago, there is no need to work on Maggie’s Farm, no more…..
The blood of men no longer need grease the wheel of progress. The past was pretty shitty before technology. Try picking rocks off a field all day in the hot sun or working as an actual cow hand. A couple of hours of that, you will be glad to get back to your video games and enjoying your personal freedom and choices and creating a better life for yourself. Be selfish, as a man. Because: you can do that now. Your slavery is coming to an end. Be about yourself. Women have to earn a right to your time now. Technology is slowly putting men in the driver seat. People will see you as a villain, but don’t mind what other people say. Our morality is centered around gyno-centrism, but that is all changing now. Our morals can now start to shift, as technology allows that to happen. Be aware of it. Explain it to people. You will be a moral leader, not a sheep. You are the future. The future is male freedom, thanks to technology. Embrace that freedom, celebrate it, use it well, be proud of it and reject all attempts at shaming you, for embracing your freedom. You are one of the lucky ones that will show other men, the married sheep, the way forward, as the luxury of mgtow becomes more and more available to more and more men, as technology improves and morals evolve.
Follow The Sith Code:
Peace is a lie. There is only passion.
Thru passion, I gain strength.
Through strength, I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chains are broken.
The force shall free me.
…..or else, make up your own code, you can do that!
“Equality is a lie. A myth to appease the masses. Simply look around and you will see the lie, for what it is! There are those with power, those with the strength and will to lead. And there are those meant to follow – those incapable of anything but servitude, and a meager, worthless existence.” Don’t chain yourself down, to serve women, just to appease the fairy tale of gender equality. It’s not real. Don’t be a Mangina or Male Feminist. Have more self respect than that.
Mgtow is about being Alpha. Conventional marriage was historically necessary for society’s survival, but not any more. It is an institution for Betas now. Most gay men are not Betas, but perhaps marriage is now better suited to gay men….at least the Beta ones. Let the Beta gay men have marriage. Gay men are welcome as Alpha Brothers in mgtow, to be respected, but those gay men who are Beta are welcome to embrace marriage….just realize that choice is patterned on gay men jealously mimicking straight gyno-centric enslaved men. If you are gay and want that lifestyle, you have my blessing buddy….
Mgtow men are not so much trying to end gynocentrism, as simply uncovering what has always made society function: the generally unrecognized gynocentric enslavement of men, to keep women alive….so obvious in the Biblical account and now uncovered by biology and a careful reading of the historical and anthropological record. Gynocentrism is a function of a low tech society trying to cope with survival. Gynocentrism is the unrecognized elephant in the room. The socially approved delusion of gynocentrism is so strong, that men slave for women their entire lives, feminists look at this and come to the conclusion: women were oppressed by men. We can look now and the blinders are off, we have taken the red pill. We can recognize gyno-centrism for what it is: It’s a labor organizing strategy that was needed to keep a low tech society from collapsing. The economy was arranged to exploit men, because no technological alternative was available and men are biologically disposable in nature, since sperm is plentiful, but eggs are scarce. The mistake that some in the mgtow community make on the topic of gynocentrism is they think debating and informing men about gynocentric exploitation of men, informing men about their enslavement, will somehow help end male slavery, to women. Nonsense. If it ends, it is technological development that will end it….and what will not end it, is simply knowing how it works. We already know that and it hasn’t ended….yet. Technology gives us the wind at our back, that pushes the sail along. In fact, with continued technological development, assuming we don’t fuck up the planet, it’s pretty much assured that gynocentrism will end, on it’s own….because technology makes it unnecessary for survival.
Then, the male and the female human must chart a new course, a new power sharing arrangement between the sexes. We can’t go back, but we can go forward and we must. We must look deep into our evolutionary past, understand it, how it made us human. Part of this is understanding the unique aspects of the feminine as well as the masculine, and how they worked together in a complimentary way in evolution. This means seeing through the delusions and fairy tales which the feminists have constructed about gender roles and social and economic reality…including the whole bullshit theory of “The Patriarchy”…as men supposedly having nothing better to do in history, but to “oppress” women. We must figure out what of the past we can save or salvage or transform….and what we must simply throw away. We must discuss freedom, power and responsibility between the sexes, in the new era that will quickly emerge as the forces of technology and trans-humanism will soon overwhelm and transform us. What will the gender roles be then? What of birth? Child rearing? Will we use technology to make babies? If women don’t make babies any more, what will this change? What of marriage? What of sex robots? How will this change male-female social contracts? We are living in the most interesting time, in all of evolution. I am old, but I see the start of it. If you are young, you are lucky: you will live to see things that amaze you. Will technology so radically change biology that the questions I ask will seem Mickey Mouse at some point? In the short run: Will democracy even be possible, with women voting? Or will they simple screw it up, because they did not biologically evolve to lead? So far the answer seems to be, women voting is pretty much destroying the modern world. If that doesn’t change somehow, we are done as a modern technological species. Elon Musk talks about this in his video No More Kids…..So many questions need to be first asked, then slowly answered, in time. However, I would guess: The end of gynocentrism is inevitable and pretty much unstoppable, unless we screw up our technological development. Gynocentrism is only needed when humans are in a primitive technological state, when compared with where we will be in a few more decades. Even now we are at a sufficiently advanced technological level, that many of can see that gyno-centrism and it’s accompanying enslavement of men, is a social artifact of the past. It’s not needed any more. We don’t need slaves to pick cotton any more, thanks to technology. We don’t need men to pick cotton for women any more, thanks to technology.
Some men sense this, with all around them in the technology and they correctly figure, why the hell am I a house slave?…..they are correct. Mgtow is the leading edge of that perceptual knife. However: No need to push the red button to end the world and weed out the weak. That will happen on it’s own. Leave it alone. It’s already happening: The birth rate is collapsing on it’s own. We are at 50% replacement rate in advanced countries. A few generations of 50% replacement rate, which is our current rate, leads us to a very small human population. Assuming we keep science going: Technology can help us weed out the unfit before they are born. However, there is a real danger in the current trends of birth rate collapse:
Our main worry now is, there is an inverse mathematical relationship between fertility and intelligence. Evolution and humans becoming smart enough to invent technology, that happened because Darwinian evolution was brutal and killed many humans off, selecting out the best….us….in a very long and brutal process over time. However, technology has an unanticipated very negative side effect: Technology itself slows down that brutal Darwinian mechanism, of weeding out the unfit. Something has changed: Evolution now seems to weed out the best, while leaving the unfit to survive and increase in numbers. That’s dangerous and unexpected….and potentially lethal for the human race because: Smart people don’t breed much any more, so the consequence is, the idiots are genetically taking over….for now. I hope this is temporary. Feminism encourages that trend by asking smarter than average women to go to university and work ….and avoid breeding. If you are very very smart and female, you have an extremely low probability of having more than one child. That feminist breeding pattern…of the best women avoiding breeding….that pattern may be the dumbest thing humans have ever done, in evolution. That has to change. If only idiots are born, we humans stand no chance of survival as a species that uses technology. We will perish, if we become too dumb for our technology. Volcanoes on Earth could end us. Comets wiped out the dinosaurs and will eventually wipe us out, too. Our only hope of survival in the cosmic shooting gallery that is the universe we evolved in, is to leave this rock and become a space faring species….as Elon Musk and many others have suggested. And that means we need a lot more, smart humans. We must take control of our evolution. We need to listen to a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who noted in 1927:
“Three Generations of Imbeciles Are Enough” So wrote Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in Buck v. Bell, a 1927 Supreme court case upholding a Virginia law that authorized the state to surgically sterilize certain “mental defectives” without their consent….from wiki