Why women endanger democracy: If you listen to Professor Jordan Peterson talk about personality types, you will find:
-personality is largely influenced by genetics
-liberals tend to be born liberals
-conservatives tend to be born conservatives
-liberals are more creative, more open to new people, new ideas
-conservatives are better managers, not as open to new people, new ideas
-women tend to be higher in agreeableness and openness, in the “Big 5” personality types
-more women than men, tend to be liberals
Further, you will find that women tend to vote more liberal than men, because women have more openness and agreeableness, in the Big 5 personality types.
Further, if you look into it, married women tend to vote more conservatively, single women tend to vote more liberally. Married women with children are more conservative because they have something to protect: their children, and their husband’s money, which they want to keep. Single women have less to protect, and more need to be protected. Since they have no man, they vote in men who say they will help these women, and give them the money that a husband would give them…if they had a husband. For single women, government is essentially a substitute husband…..a way to take resources away from the husband they don’t have.
What this means: Women live longer than men, vote more often than men, and are slightly more than 50% of all voters, so the dice is loaded towards voting in governments that allow immigrants in, and governments that ramp up social benefits…since men pay 70% of all taxes, but women reap the benefits of 70% of all taxes.
So women voted in Angela Merkel, who brought in all those immigrants. And women voted in the previous governments, that ramped up social benefits, which in time would lure Third World Immigrants, to come to Germany. Women as a group are more agreeable and open than men, and they tend to vote for governments that vote to let in immigrants, because agreeable, open people are more welcoming of immigrants…then men get to pay the tab. It’s the same pattern in every country……Not to pick on the Germans.
And note that the birth rate is very low, in most advanced countries. That means lots of women have only 1 child, or no children. Most of those women with few or no children tend to vote liberal-left on the political spectrum, because the left leaning politicians, they appeal to female maternal instincts of letting in immigrants, who become the children these women never had. And men then get to pay for it. So men in Europe are being coerced by women, to let in other men, then the men have to pay and keep society going, for men from the Third World to come in, at the invitation of women, so the new men can breed and have large families, and take over Europe. Essentially, that’s what is happening, long term. Not hyperbole…every demographer knows it. That is our political system now. So, to pay for immigrant benefits, European men pay the bills for these “New Swedes”, for children the European women didn’t have, or too busy working and making money, to have. So by encouraging European women to work instead of having their own children, we encourage low birth rates, and then eventually the women feel the need for more children around, so they vote in governments who bring our women children from the Third World…..and in this way, we encourage our population, to be replaced. Pretty crazy, huh? We do this because of evolved traits in women. So low birth rates encourage very liberal voting patterns…and that’s what we have.
And if that’s what people want, I have no problem with that. If Europeans want to replace themselves with other people, and do so willingly, then that’s their choice….let’s just be clear about what is going on, why it’s happening and talk about it freely.
In the United States, the same gender-based voting patterns, appear. Men in the United States tend to vote Republican, a lot more than they vote Democrat. And women tend to vote more Democrat, except married women, who tend to vote Republican more. Generally this is the pattern of voting, in all democracies. Men tend to respond well, to talk of military spending and security and “building the wall and getting Mexico to pay for it”. Women tend to respond well to government entitlements, which turned the government into a backup husband, for most women. That’s why most democracies end up, to their eyeballs in debt, for future promises of government, to look after people: women vote for this, because they know they will benefit from this, but won’t pay for it. Men will. Women tend to respond to socialism with more enthusiasm than men, because socialism is about taking wealth from one person, usually male, and giving it to another person, usually female…sharing appeals to women, more than men, who tend to favor competition.
I think these patterns exist because we evolved in small tribes. They are deeply ingrained and biological. Men tended to run the political aspects of leadership in a tribe, and compete for leadership positions, women didn’t. Feminists have the basic structure of society right: It was Patriarchy. This was necessary for survival. Women had babies, men protected them. And women evolved more open, agreeable qualities, because these are good for what evolution threw at women: They had to get along with other women, to raise children, in small intensely connected groups. And there was very often warfare, so as many historians have noted, women’s agreeableness and openness means they will genetically survive invasion, as they will just spread their legs, for the new Alpha Male…..
So that’s why many women in Europe show up at airports in Europe, to welcome migrants. They are welcoming the children, they never had……and these women are the people controlling our future, controlling the political process, because they dominate the ballot box. We see the mess this leads to in Europe. Question: Can Democracy survive women getting the vote? My guess: Probably no.
…just a guess, I could be wrong