The Broken Psychology of Feminism Save for later Reblogpost

TimBucks
@TimBucks

Send Private MessageSubscribe50

The psychology of why feminism won’t work: Men evolved to protect woman, women evolved to be protected and have children. A genetic deal was worked out: women lost some social power, in exchange for protection. Men were in charge of society, but sacrificed more than women, in exchange for social respect from women. This formula is balanced, both parties get something.

This formula worked, because women got to chose which men to mate with, and female choice and males competing for females is how natural mammal biology works, so this is in harmony with Mother Nature and evolution. Men competed with each other for social status in any given hierarchy…in order to impress a woman. This worked because men evolved for competition. It’s the same reason guys love football and sports…we evolved to compete with other men, it’s natural.

This formula worked for the longest time, because 99.99% of our evolution, we humans were in a low-tech environment, with females directly dependent on men for survival. So women gave men social respect, and gave up some social and economic power, in exchange for protection and help in survival. In exchange, men got family. Today, even the family part of the female/male compact is under threat, as women delay marriage, hop from bed to bed, making a baby with Man A, then asking Man B to pay for it…

Then the modern world came. Men invented technology which freed women up from having to be pregnant. Women could now work in the modern world that men had created, women could compete for power with men, as rivals. Having women as rivals for power upsets the whole psychological balance of the past, it upset the genetic deal set up between the sexes, where women gave up competing with men directly, and gave men social respect, in exchange for protection and care, from men.

So now women want to be able to compete against men, often have economic and social power over men, while at the same time having lower ranking men protect them. Only manginas and cucks buy into that psychology. This won’t work, for any man with a shred of self-respect and dignity. Males no longer have enough reason to protect women. Why should men protect those who compete directly against them, for power? Why would a man have to sacrifice, for women who have more power, than he does? Makes no sense from a man’s point of view.

I had a conversation with a woman that went like this:

Woman: Men and women are equal.

Me: I don’t believe women are equal to men.

Woman: Yes we are!

Me: No….the way I look at it, I am a benevolent sexist. It’s my job to protect and provide for a woman.

Woman: That sounds great. Then why can’t we be equal?

Me: Why should I protect a woman, if she is equal to me? Why should I provide for her, if she is equal to me? Makes no sense….

Woman: You should protect her, provide for her, plus treat her like she is equal.

Me: Bullshit. If she is equal, why doesn’t she protect me? Why doesn’t she provide for me?

And what makes this male-female antagonism all much, much worse, is feminist theory is being taught to young women at university. This false theory claims the past is nothing but males oppressing women. This is breeding an army of resentful women, with a chip on their shoulder against men. The truth is, in the past, men made tremendous sacrifices for women, both sides gave up something in the past, but this is lost on a generation of historically illiterate millennial women, who are being trained in resentment and entitlement.

The psychology between men and women is now completely unbalanced in our current feminist world. This new feminist power arrangement will never work, between men and women. That’s why all past cultures were not set up like this. No previous culture ran on feminism…irregardless of race or religion. You know why? It doesn’t work, as it is unbalanced and out of whack, with evolution. Meetoo proved it: Women want to be protected by men, while at the same time now having power over men, while at the same time being able to compete directly against men for power and status, while at the same time giving every woman the power to be able to destroy the life of any man…that’s an unworkable formula and every man who watched the Bret Kavanaugh hearing knows it.

Females get a bonus of protection that men don’t get. But women paid a price for that, in the foundational genetic deal between men and women: They didn’t fully participate in the power structure and men got social respect from women, for their male role. Now, women still insist on the benefits of the foundational deal between men and women….but without cost, to them. Now, women still insist on all sorts of protection, but they are unwilling to pay the price for that, by giving men the social respect they used to get. Men are now expected to protect, but are not entitled to respect. And the fact that women now compete directly for power, with men, acts as a kind of withdrawal of the female price for protection…..but that raises a social transaction payment problem:  why should men protect women, when she competes with him, might have more power than he does?

So women want the benefits of the foundational genetic deal, without paying the price. Males are now expected to provide for women and women are allowed to be provided for, but men now have no authority. So now we have no male authority, women don’t respect us, but still expect us to be their work donkeys….and we are getting tired of it all. There’s no psychological motivation, to be a responsible man now. What for? So women can crap on you, show you no respect, while you bust your ass for her, 12 hours a day? No thanks….slavery ended a long time ago.

Women now want potential economic and social dominance over men, while expecting men to still play his traditional protective role.

This is an insane social arrangement, that won’t last. It’s like an accounting equation, that ignores that assets must equal liability plus owner’s equity….

All social arrangements between the sexes must be balanced, if our gender arrangements are to survive the test of time. The arrangements must be fair and balanced, based on nature and evolution, and workable in the real world. Feminism meets none of these standards, for survivability. The genders did not evolve to be equal. We evolved to be complimentary, based on trade-offs. No side gets everything on their wish list. This current feminist arrangement between the sexes is too unbalanced, too much in favor of women, for it to last. It will be replaced. I don’t know what the new genetic compact will be, in the future, between men and women. But it won’t be this one…it won’t be our current feminist one… Feminism won’t last, because it doesn’t work.

How do I know it won’t last? Elon Musk has a video out, called “No more Kids”…basically modern women have so few kids, because of feminism, that we are going extinct. Feminism is cultural suicide.