5:50 “Make babies, make money. Both of these women are useless, free-loading pieces of shit”. To which I say to Mr. Colttaine: Bullshit, dude. Where do you think you came from? Where do you think all humans came from? Some woman’s ass. There is a big crisis in Europe now, Muslims are taking over, not enough white babies being born, say the ethnic nationalists. (of which I’m not one of them)
To which I say: Modern women have a choice.The useful ones go to work, make money, they avoid shooting babies out of their asses, driving down the birth rate, thus dooming the country in the future. The white nationalists blame the brown people. I blame the white women and I blame the white men, for being dumb enough not to understand what is happening, and just blaming the brown people, rather than fix the problem: We should directly pay women, to shoot babies, out of their asses, in the exact numbers we need, to replace us in the population.
Of course the worst ones, the real retards, blame “The Jews! The Jews!”
This is not rocket surgery, people:
Deals between men and women on shooting babies out of her ass, should be more upfront in marriage law: Marriage should be a contract: she gives you so many babies, gives you so many blow jobs, you give her X, Y, and Z. She refuses to give you sex, refuses to shoot babies out of her ass, the marriage is over, you get to keep your toys, throw her out of your house.
I know a woman named Charlotte. Bright girl, could have been a doctor. She decided to make 5 babies, so she did. Her children that she had with John, her engineer husband, the kids grew up, had successful lives, produced $20 Million in future economic wealth for the country.
None of that $20 Million would have been created, if Charlotte didn’t shoot 5 babies, out of her ass.
Another true story: I know a woman named Libby. She was on welfare, when she was very young. They told her to get a job. She got pregnant, got into the system permanently. Then when Jeff, her son, was ready to leave home, Libby felt her free ride on welfare was coming to an end, as their were not “children” in the house. So Libby spent a year in bars, riding the Cock Carasol, till she got pregnant. Her daughter was born, she was back on the gravy train, the Freeloading cunt.
So when Colttaine says women who have babies are free loading pieces of shit? Far from it….all future economic growth arises out of humans being born. It depends on the exact situation….how many kids the woman has, basically.
The real freeloaders are the women who only shoot one baby, out of her ass. When she gets old, there are no working people, to pay her pension bills. She has created no future population. Freeloading cunt. I know lots of these women. Most are feminists. They make one baby with a professional man, refuse to have more…just one is enough to guarantee a big house and nice upper class life. I call them “One and Done Women”….you see them with their yoga mats in the middle of the afternoon, heading to yoga class.
The key is how many children a woman has. We need women of child-bearing age to have an average of 2.1 children per woman, just to replace the people getting old and dying. If we don’t do this, the economic system falls apart in the future….pensions don’t get funded etc. If you check the birth rate in advanced countries it is 1.something…..not near enough.
So because of this situation, the government recognizes the low birth rate as a problem for the future, as we will have a people shortage in advanced countries, so they let in Muslim immigrants, because they are the only culture having lots of excess kids. Problem is, this destabilizes society….incompatible culture.
My solution? We should PAY women for children they have, in excess of 2 children. The more kids she has, past 2 kids, the more money she gets. A straight up deal: Have just 1 or 2 babies, we don’t help you. More than that? We help you…that’s the deal. So, yes, make babies, make money, that’s the deal….women. Shoot more than 2 babies out of your ass, we will pay you women, as you are creating future people, to grow the population, keep those pension checks going, when I get old. If done right, it’s a good investment for society.
A few common sense rules is all we need:
-she must be under 25 to enroll….as women over 30 often run into fertility issues
-she must have had 2 kids already
-preference given to married women, since having a dad in the house leads to far better social outcomes, especially for boys
-a few income limits, as we don’t need to subsidize the fertility of people with more than enough money
Being a Mother with 4 or 5 kids should be a lucrative career option for women. Just one or two kids means the woman is barely keeping the population alive, but with three or four, or five, the woman is making a substantial economic contribution to the future, more than making up the money we help her with. And women evolved to do this. Many would be quite happy with this option.
Call it a MCTC if you like: Marginal Child Tax Credit. Economists would obviously have to work out the level of detail and sophistication needed for this, so extensive detail is beyond the scope of this limited narrative, which is mostly conceptual. But mostly things like Tax Credits and Pension Contributions for Mothers, paid for by the rest of the taxpayers and help with housing costs would do the most good. It should all be calculated on the probable economic benefit for society down the road, based on the number of children a woman has, past 2. So done this way, it can be fully funded by the Mother herself. This works if her net economic contribution is calculated on a more realistic basis: On the basis of including the probable economic contribution of her children, past the two children minimum, into an economic assessment of a Mother’s probable economic contribution. As her children grow up, get educated and work, in a few decades, they contribute taxes and most will be productive. That’s a large net economic gain, for society. That’s the economic justification for the MCTC. Since most women now, with modern choices, only have 1 or occasionally 2 children, since this is driving down the birth rate far below replacement level and will cause enormous social problems down the road, we either do something like this, or continue to import future voters, future workers…..for the children we are not bothering to have. Modern women now have a choice: to work and have fewer children…or none. Or to have a lot of children and probably be poor and stressed. Most women take the first choice. Women need better choices, unless we want our population replaced, from outside immigration. Done this way, it’s not a giveaway. It can be a very solid, provable, self-funding economic investment for the whole country.
Research indicates both that the birth rate is too low, we are going to run into serious demographic implosion, according to Elon Musk in his video “No More Kids”….on you-tube. Research also indicates that about 20% of women would like to be nothing but full time Mothers….see Ben Shapiro interview of Christina Hoff Sommers on you-tube….. Provided she pumps out lots of kids, why not? The female role in nature, whether human or elephant, is to keep the tribe going. In the pre-technological era, basically before 1900, we could count on continually rising population levels occurring naturally. Due to things like the invention of birth control, modern education and the modern economy, that is no longer true and advanced technological societies are in demographic free-fall and are imploding….and they are importing massive numbers of immigrants from incompatible cultures. All this may lead to civil war. Modern women have a choice: they can make money and go for status, or have children. Many would rather not be poor. Since they are producing the next generation, and they contribute so much, in fact women create all economic value, by creating life, so men should look after them, as the Hungarians are starting to do. Video below. It’s not that hard to turn this around. Just pay women to “shoot babies out of their ass.”