I watched “Way of The World”‘s latest video about why we must “let the west fall”.
I find myself disagreeing with this Englishman more and more as time goes on. In the Bitchute comments of the video, I found myself engaged in conversation with a number of delusional people who are still supporting (as WoTW does) the “white enclaves” fantasy and, as was the point of his newest video, “leaving the current system behind”. These people suggest that we become “like Orania” or like “The Amish” in America. Literally suggesting we become South Africa; hated minorities in our own homes.
At this point, I think anyone suggesting we retreat to the countryside as any sort of long-term solution should be denounced as an anti-white shill because they are willing ceding places our ancestors spent thousands of years building up to foreigners who will destroy it and offering a completely impractical “solution” to the problem. The Amish are only permitted to live the way they do because they are, for now, under the protection of the US military. They are pacifists though, and their high fertility and traditionalism will all be for nothing if they do not fight against the invading third-world hordes. Even if they do fight back, they do not have the numbers or technology to win should the US military not come to their defense.
Here is the problem with this, as I have said but can put more succinctly, libertarian ideology involved with “white enclaves” and “rejecting the system”: The anti-white governments seeks to destroy us, and they will not suddenly forget that we exist or remove anti-white doctrines against us just because we live in the countryside now. That is the entire delusion of libertarianism: “They will just forget about us if we go somewhere else”. No, they will not. You cannot “leave” the system.
Further, non-whites are put into white areas intentionally to dilute those areas and weaken our unity. When I went through Western Canada last summer, we stopped for fuel in this small town in the south of Alberta. I cannot even remember its name, but it was not a big town in terms of resident at all. Probably smaller than Pforzheim. Guess who was the gas station attendant? An Indian guy. I spot numerous other Indians and Arabs through this small town.
Now tell me: Do you believe, that when this heavily-accented Indian man (so obviously not born in Canada) or all of these Arabs, when they planned to move to Canada or found the chance to do so, picked this little town, whose name I can’t recall, and probably doesn’t even show up on many maps, as the place they always wanted to live? No. They are there because that is where the government gave them opportunity. It is where they promised them jobs and welfare and they put them in these tiny towns so that those small towns cannot BE white enclaves. The same happened to Pforzheim. The same will happen to any little town or village. You do not have control over the immigration to your town, nor a say in it.
Inevitably, this is the part where these libertarian types will tell you “We’ll defend it!”. Okay, the second that you refuse and say you will defend it with force, you will be declared terrorists and the situation will look like American “Waco” in the early 90s.
Most importantly though, what these people are admitting is they will have to fight back and collectivize, and they say they will, so the most-important question of course then becomes: So why aren’t you defending us right now!? What is stopping you? Do you think it matters if you are in the country, in the city, or in a cave? No, they will still declare you terrorists and they will come for you. Nothing will be different whether you do this now and in Berlin or tomorrow and in the middle of nowhere. Further, in many places, the majority of the white population is living in cities, so if anything — you’d stand a better chance of forming a “militia” in a city, undetected, rather than an explicit community that can easily be identified on a map.
This idea of “we can all just leave the cities of our ancestors to burn and go be farmers in all-white rural communities and live in peace” is an idea that is just so detached from the reality of our plight that is at least as illogical as any globalist suggestion for a workable system. Actually, that’s a lie and maybe the title of this blog post should be different (but I don’t know to what), because at least these liberal/globalist ideas do actually work in achieving their nefarious goals.
That leads to the other aspect that Way of The World misunderstands, is that the system of ZOG is not “failing”; multiculturalism is not failing, they are not turning on the Jews by rioting, rather — this dystopia and collapse is exactly what they want.
Another ridiculous claim I have seen a few times, and one also on WoTW’s comment section, is this idea that once white people leave the cities, all of these black and brown people will starve to death and once again the problem will “solve itself” you might say
What all of this is, if not straight-up delusion, is cowardice. They want to believe that they can just pack up their things and go somewhere else, and they won’t have to put up any real fight in their lives and these are supposedly “men”. That all it takes to save the white race is to become hermits or farmers pretending it’s still the 13th-Century when we obviously aren’t at liberty to do so.
The other thing that is happening, is a lot of shilling for Christianity. The most popular website in all of white nationalism goes on about this a lot, recently said that race will take “a back seat” in their content, and have a crazy “plan” for a Christian revival in America, but still proclaim to be white nationalists.
Firstly, these people should be asked why they are promoting a religious agenda over a racial one.
Secondly, I’m not sure if they’ve noticed, but most Christians, like, 99% of them, are like the CEO of Chick-Fil-A
There is no reason to believe you could convince these existing Christians to become white nationalists. Orthodoxy even condemns Christian civic nationalism.
What they then suggest, is a new Church denomination and essentially reforming Christianity into some sort of white nationalist variant. Such a feat, assuming it is even possible (and I doubt it is) would take generations. In fact, it would likely take hundreds of years. As cuckservative, Christian scholars like Steve Turley note, the highest-fertility (above replacement) whites are Christians in most countries, and this is to an extent that at current rates, they will replace secular whites in about 180 years. Great, so in 200 years, we can look forward to the people shining negro shoes becoming the majority of the hated white minority…
Regardless, with America already at nearly half-white demographics and most living Swedes will live to see themselves become a minority in Sweden, I’m not sure how they figure they have time for such a reformation.
It is also going to be a very-tough sell to future race-realists that they need to accept “Christ” into their lives. Here is this two-step process:
- You tell them that Jews are responsible for all these ills, and bringing in all these brown and black people who have made life a hell on Earth. “Racism” is not only not bad, but good and we need to be “racist” in order to survive and thrive.
- You tell them that the way to go about this, is to convert to a religion which in its purest form is a heretical Jewish sect, a Jewish man is its central figure of worship, and it believes that all men were created by God and so those blacks and browns you’re supposed to discriminate against and not live among have a God-created immortal soul that will go to the same afterlife they will and therefore they are going to a globalist utopia (God’s kingdom) in death, regardless.
I think that’s going to be a real-hard sell to any sentient, racially-aware person going forward. They are going to look at you, trying to start your new Church denomination, and say “Isn’t that kinda counter-intuitive to nationalism and racism?” and the only way that these Christians will be able to convince these people is by making up some of their usual bullshit about “dual seedlines” and twisting the story of “the tower of babel” and all that other stuff. Lies are not just against the ethos of Nationalism (truth), but I’m pretty sure a sin too!
I mean, how can anyone who is supposedly aware of the JQ and an ethnic-nationalist look at things like the Chik-Fil-A guy and say “Oh yes, we need more people of his faith! That’s the answer!” and honestly expect you to believe they aren’t a subversive agent or at least an idiot? Most likely, with a lot of these Christians, is that they became born-again Christians before they became nationalists and it has become such a core part of their identity and family, that they will never denounce it; so they just lie to themselves about the contradictions of their worldview.
None of these “solutions” are going to work. As racial violence and tensions escalate in our recent times, and shit is getting “real”, we are seeing the LARPers separate from those of us who are serious about the survival of our people and our past.
We are not going to win by by roleplaying “Little House on The Prairie”, the non-whites will not just die out once they’re 100% of the urban populations, we are not going to build space and sea colonies (who wants to live there anyway?) to escape to as some Neo-Nazis bizarrely fantasize about, and accepting “Christ” into your life today is going to give you the exact opposite of a white crusader kingdom and there’s no time for religious reformation anyway.
The only way that we win is by taking back the government and institutions of our nations. It is just that cut and dry.