Is kindness biologically useful? Yein….as the Germans say, in their compound word. Sometimes yah…yes, sometimes no….nein.
Think about the migrant crisis in Sweden….letting endless migrants in. What causes it? Where will it lead:
It happens because women are kind. But isn’t human kindness an unadulterated good? No….depends on context. It turns out: Kindness is an unreliable guide to how humans should act. Feminists have embraced kindness with a vengeance. For good reason: women are kind, being kind feels natural….and our whole Judaeo-Christian religion was premised on the notion of kindness being the central virtue to a good person.
But is it?
Women….and feminists in particular, think they are morally superior because they are more emotional and “caring” and push for welfare and open borders. My response: It’s easy to care, with other people’s money. Men pay 70% of all taxes. Women pay 30%. It’s easy to do this, when men are paying the bills.
Women vote, bring in welfare, endless Muslim immigrants come in for the welfare brought in by women’s kindnesses. Then no one dares send them back, because that would be “unkind”….and would hurt her tender ‘feelies.’ Then over time, too many Muslim immigrants come in and collect welfare and have babies, then eventually take control of the elections. Everyone wakes up one day and realizes “Europe is now Eurostan!” …oh shit! What happened?
Then a race war will likely happen, a religious war of sorts, starts between the mostly brown Muslims and the remaining whites. There will be fewer whites than there used to be, because feminism told mostly white women to kill their babies and get a job. They listened. Women listen to authority. Feminists are the new authority on all things female. Nice going white women! You listened to the feminists. Now you are causing a race war.
Here’s where your feminism led us: Your kindness was manipulated by feminists. Your kindness and human empathy will lead us to a pointless race and religious war no one wants. To feminists I say: Nice going. Isn’t being female and being kind great? Isn’t it morally superior? Gurl Power!!! <sarcasm>
Here’s a thought: maybe women were not meant to run society?
<I realize this is heresy against the new religion of feminism>
Maybe women were not meant to vote?….think about it, that’s all I’m asking you.
By the way I’m not letting white men off the hook: white men support women’s voting rights. Maybe white men should be ashamed of yourself, for letting women vote, if the death of Europe is the result? Yes, I think that’s right. Women should not vote. Quit catering to them. To the men who support women voting: Nice going.
In this case, women’s emotional weakness, which is often a strength in life, is instead a cause of harm, when it is reflected in public policy in a feminist society…which Sweden certainly is. That’s why we need to take the vote away from women. Voting means political control has gone to women, since they are the majority of the population. That gives women leadership for the shape of society and major decisions. So far, it’s a complete disaster. Maybe the lesson of Sweden is: That won’t work.
Why not? Because: A political system based on emotionalism will not work, long term. It just doesn’t work. Maybe there is an even broader lesson here: Democracy will not work. It has a fatal flaw: Women vote, women are emotional.
Yes, that’s what I believe: Women generally speaking should not lead. But why not?
We see biological clues as to why, all over human evolution. What is the pattern of human experience? All the pattern is the same for all races: Women do not lead in any primitive human society. That is a clue for us about what works, what does not. No culture has survived and prospered in history and evolution, based on female leadership. That’s another evolutionary clue, about what works, what fails.
Why is that? Why is female leadership not a successful evolutionary pattern? A short answer is that obviously nature and evolution did not intend that. Patterns that work in nature, tend to repeat themselves. Females evolved for a role as Mothers and the social center of the home….not generally Alpha political leaders. That’s why you see that pattern everywhere, in every race, for all time. Generally women tilt more than men, towards “caring”….which is why 99% of all nurses are women. Men tend towards the analytical….which is why 99% of engineers are men….not a Social Construct…it’s a general biological pattern that should inform the shape of our thinking on politics.
Women do not have high levels of moral development because nature intended them to be Mothers. (see Kohlberg and Carol Gilligan’s controversy on male vs. female moral development) In a nutshell, there are 6 stages of moral development. Women only evolved to level 3, which is mostly about caring. Men evolved to level 6, a higher moral level. Likely the reason for this is evolution required different things of women and men. Men evolved to lead the tribe, women evolved to nurture new life.
In the case of being Mothers, their emotionality is an evolutionary asset. Women responded to children in our evolutionary history, caring for them. This made women emotionally nuanced, more than men. If you take 50 men at random, 50 women at random, try to pick out the kindest person, there is a lot of overlap. Many men are kind. However, that doesn’t change the fact that the kindest person will almost always be a woman….not a man. That’s why human societies have always been organized with women looking after infants. Women are better at it on average, than men. Women are more interested in people. Science confirms all this. Jordan Peterson has mentioned this in his talks. At the root of this is Sexual Dimorphism itself: Men evolved to lead, to work, to take risks, because they are bigger, stronger, evolutionarily expendable. Women evolved to have children. Human mammals evolved as every other mammal did: to protect and care for young mammals.
It’s amazing that feminism has so screwed up public thinking that it has become somewhat revolutionary, to say things that in other times would be considered to be very trite or banal or self-evident, to even the dumbest, slowest human beings. Things like “Women are supposed to have babies” or “There are only two genders”…these are now considered to be Revolutionary statements. Well done, feminism. You have won in Sweden. We now see the results.
But seriously, we should not let Sweden destroy itself. How do we fix this? We should follow the successful evolutionary pattern that has been replicated and verified for effectiveness, tens of thousands of times, for every race, religion and ethnicity, for all time:
Generally the social pattern that seems to work the best is men lead, women are the emotional center of family, the Mothers….but not the political leaders. In other words, Patriarchy. Sweden is a Matriarchy. That’s why it is failing. Matriarchies always fail. That’s why there is no evolutionary fossil record for successful Matriarchy societies: they don’t work. They die very quickly, then Patriarchies replace them.
Most successful cultures have a Patriarchal Pattern: Men lead, protect women and children, organize resources and do things to give women and children a good life. Women breed when young and don’t compete when they are young, for status against men. That’s Patriarchy.
Sweden has constructed a society with the opposite social pattern to evolutionary norms: In feminist Matriarchies women start to lead and organize resources, assume political control, compete with men for status when the women are young and of breeding age. Women avoid having children.
Obviously Matriarchies have fatal flaws all over the place…which is why they keep disappearing from history. They go extinct quickly and are replaced by Patriarchies. In the short term feminism….Matriarchy…is winning….in Sweden, which is the top feminist society in the world. It’s an experiment in Matriarchy and Feminism….does it work?
Here are the results of the feminist Matriarchy Swedish experiment, so far:
-Volvo, the top Swedish company, might move out of Sweden, because there is now too much crime
-Assyrian Christians in Sweden announced that a Civil War is looming
-Security Experts say Sweden is well on it’s way to a Civil War
-UPS stopped delivering packages to Muslim areas, because drivers keep getting beat up
-Christian churches in migrant areas keep blowing up
-the use of hand grenades in Sweden is so high, it’s unique for a country not yet in a Civil War
-deadly shootings have risen by a factor of 10, in one generation
-rape just went up 20% for women, 40% for men
Yes, these changes were brought to you, by human kindness. Women are kind. They open their hearts, they vote for welfare and open borders. The coming Civil War will be a consequence of female kindness. That’s Matriarchy, that’s feminism, that’s letting women vote. That’s what happens.
However: Which pattern will work, in the long run? Patriarchy….as it does every time. The only questions to settle are things like: How long will this feminist insanity go on? When will our feminist society fail? Which Patriarchy will take it’s place? How much damage will feminism do before the real violence starts?
The deep reasons for this failure of Matriarchies are biological: Women should not lead, should not control the political agenda because tilting leadership towards the emotional as the basis for political morals, often leads to bad outcomes. Emotionalism doesn’t seem to work….except at a small scale of tight emotional bonds of a natural human family. That’s what the evidence of history and evolution says. Communism makes the same mistake….trying to organize whole societies based on emotionalism, with things like “social justice” at the core of it. Their communist doctrine…..like feminism…. at it’s core is based on emotion, without the balancing Reason. So what’s at the core of Sweden’s decline?
Feminism…and women’s voting. It wasn’t meant to be. Since women are kind and vote, we get open borders…and an endlessly expanding welfare state, to cater to women’s desire, to take care of all the babies in the world. On the flip side: Feminism told women in Sweden not to have kids. So they don’t….see the problem? That’s why women were not meant to lead. They were meant to be led. That’s how nature works. The foolish thing Swedish did, was actually believe women were equal to them. So they gave them power….feminism and voting. Sweden was the first feminist nation. We can now see that experiment in social form playing out, in real time. Sweden is our future. It’s our choice. We can have feminism and be taken over. Or we can restore Patriarchy and keep our culture. It’s our choice, as men. The Patriarchy that is Islam, tells women: have children. So they do. Over time, their numbers will increase. In the end, feminists will lose. It’s just a matter of who will end feminism? European men, or Islamic men? Once Muslim men run Sweden, do you imagine they will let white Swedish women to vote? I don’t. Women’s right to vote will be taken away by either European men, or Muslim men. Summing up the root of the problem: Feminists have not reconciled themselves to the fact that evolution itself is entirely against the feminist narrative. Ditto for men who support feminism. Are you a feminist? What’s it like, supporting an ideology that is destroying Europe?
Let’s quite fighting nature, fighting natural patterns. Some things were meant to be. There is an internal logic in nature, in living things. They evolved to move towards something. They have internal drives…goals of a sort. Men evolved to climb up the Dominance Hierarchy, to build families. Women evolved to bear children, when they are young. Aborting 70 Million American babies means destroying the lives of tens of millions of American women. That means feminism is not about “empowering women”, it’s about destroying the natural order, by ordering human society based on unnatural patterns that lead to social death. That’s why women are so miserable. Women have not yet understood this consciously, but they will…Their minds have been hijacked by a philosophy that works against their natural biology. This leads to much unhappiness….and social destruction…as we see in Sweden.
Take your pick, Swedish women. As The Who put it: “Meet the new boss….same as the old boss.”