Islam, Europeans and Evolution and Patriarchy… Save for later Reblog
“There are signs, that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe, without swords, without guns, without military conquests. The 50 Million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.” ….Muammer Gaddafi, leader of Libya in 2006
Islam, Europeans and Evolution and Patriarchy:
Evolution takes place at a macro-level….at a social level….not just an individual human level. This must be understood, if Europeans hope to survive.
Meaning whether genes survive, depends on whether cultures, which are organized collections of genetic traits…whether the cultural patterns which support those genes, survive. So what has been the dominant social organizing pattern for 99.9% of our evolutionary history? What has worked? What has survived? The feminists have it right, in a way: the Patriarchy has dominated. But rather than just saying it’s a bad thing, another way of looking at this fact of male domination of history, is this: When there is male domination socially, survival is what happens. That means Patriarchies are actually good things if people want to survive into the future. Patriarchies help men survive. They help women survive, too. Meaning societies that tend to survive are almost never female dominated…they are always male dominated. It’s a successful natural social pattern. The anthropological literature supports all this.
That is a strikingly large fact of evolution with big consequences, for the hope of European survival. There is something about female dominated societies, Matriarchies, something about the way they function, that gives them low reproductive and genetic survival potential in nature. It’s a fact: Matriarchies almost never survive evolution. Why is that?
And even better: What does? It is what we think of as Patriarchal societies, that tend to survive, along with their genes.
On a practical level, part of the reason Patriarchies have survival value is that Patriarchal societies actively work against some aspects of evolved female nature, such the evolutionary tendencies of female preference for monkey branching. This stabilizes society. So, those Patriarchal societies which constrain female sexuality, they tend to survive, along with the genes that produce them. That’s why Moses introduced “Thou shalt not commit adultery” into Jewish culture: the women were basically whores, were monkey branching, it had to stop, if the culture was to survive. Men had to step up and be in control of the women. Moses was the Patriarch’s Patriarchy….The same thing happens in Islam, even more so: In Islam monkey branching by women is contained by social pressure, male authority and putting bags over their heads and generally restricting female freedom and social freedom.
Think of it this way: religion made up concepts like “sin” and “whores” and adultery. Why? It was obviously to control women, and their runaway sexuality that seeks Alpha Males. Men who came up with religions instinctively knew this about women, even though they did not understand evolutionary biology, as it had not been invented yet. “Sin” and it’s religious control, was a socially evolved control mechanism, that allowed society to keep stable, by allowing beta males sexual access to females….by restraining female hyper-gamy, which destabilizes social groups, as it is doing right now in America, where 80% of women now chase 20% of men and society is coming unglued. Socially evolved control and manipulation mechanisms have always been part of our evolutionary system…Just like men wanting to have sex with a large number of women is part of our social and evolutionary baggage, just like women wanting to be monkey-branching and hyper-gamous, is part of evolution. This social control of females allows Beta male monkeys to also bring fruit to females, for access to sex. Same with humans. Religion constrains the Alpha Male for a while…..allowing the Beta Human Male to mate. So the Beta Male will buy into the social control dictates of religion, for some sexual access. Even though she prefers the Alpha monkey, she may copulate with the beta monkey….same thing with humans…..and in humans, the pattern of social control of female sexuality through religion, it arose to allow groups of genes to survive. And it’s all based on Patriarchy…..male authority….and is deeply embedded in Islam.
Of course today, religion fades away, we live in large anonymous groups without our relatives watching us, Tinder and porn is available, so we are hyper-stimulated, with no brake pedal on female sexual nature. But religion worked to contain this, for a long time. It still works in Islamic countries.
And this relationship between Patriarchy and evolution, it does not only work in Islam. It works with the Amish in America and in religious Jews in Israel, the Haredim, all of whom are Patriarchy centered, with high fertility rates. My view is that Patriarchal religions are a social utility and social adaptation that is evolutionarily useful and has been for a very long time.
You may not like Islam, may think it’s a terrible religion, but from a genetic point of view, what can I say? It works…..it gets genes into the next generation.
So I don’t believe Islam is “true” in a literal sense. But it seems to be true in an evolutionary sense. It seems the current religion which is most aligned with functional evolutionary patterns, for social survival. Islam embraces Patriarchy. So it continues in evolution. Christianity used to be Patriarchal, but it degraded and is now an effeminate Matriarchal religion. So it will die. Christian and post-Christian societies are dying….the evidence is all around us.
And another practical reason for the survival of Patriarchies is this: As part of this package of genetic possibilities, within the social mix of Patriarchal societies, are social provisions for ensuring a mixture of genes, not just from dominant men…that too I’ll bet, is part of their reason for it’s evolutionary success. I think the extra labor from low level men, who are allowed to reproduce and will thus cooperate, this gives those Patriarchal societies more survival value…..from dead soldiers protecting such a society, for instance.
Patriarchy? It works everywhere, in all races, all religions, all cultures, through all of human time. Why? It’s got to be much more than a mere coincidence. The reason must be, it simply works, somehow. The overall pattern of an overall Patriarchal society, which brings in more genes from dominant men, while slowly weeding out the weaker ones, while allowing a social structure to allow most males to breed, even if most will eventually be out-competed by other men, that is the overall pattern that has survived genetically, for 99.9% of our evolutionary history.
This brings us to Europe, which rejected Patriarchy.
What are the consequences of that? Elon Musk knows. Pay attention at the end of this video, to the look on the young woman’s face, when she realized women have destroyed Europe:
Europe might be genetically finished, if European men and women don’t fix this problem, very soon. It is falling to a Muslim culture steeped in Patriarchy. Why so? Are the Muslims to blame? My answer: NO…..Rather than just blame the Muslims, let’s be a bit more courageous and honest: Europeans have decided to become a culture where men allowed women to dominate that culture. For details please visit Sweden. It is a feminist state. So is Canada. We did it to ourselves. Which means we can fix it, if we want to. Islam doesn’t have that kind of power, unless we let it.
Result of our Matriarchy: European men are being replaced, by brown men in Europe. The Matriarchy doesn’t work….if you are a male and want to survive evolution, in your culture you were born to. Feminism doesn’t work….except for women. Science tells us that 80% of all human women have left offspring, whereas only 40% of human males have left offspring. The reason is, in mammal populations, for good genetic reasons, females are picky. They want the best males, which leads to the best offspring. That’s how we survive as humans. It’s a good thing. But one thing this means is that genetically, all males are in a precarious position. Women get pregnant, which is inordinate biological burden, so she gets to choose the father, so this means men compete for women and many men are left out….but very few women are left out. So from a woman’s biological point of view, it makes sense to bring in more men. She will almost always have his genes represented in the next generation, whereas bringing in more male genes always lowers the genetic success rate of the males within a given space. So the feminist push for more immigration is biologically understandable, if we only take the woman’s position into account: No matter which males are dominant, every woman can spread her legs for the next conqueror. Immigration does not threaten women’s genetic survival. It does so for men. That’s why men build walls. Men don’t get pregnant. Men don’t have that option of spreading their legs to genetically survive. It’s do or die.
When women vote, the political landscape shifts slightly….just enough to bring in open borders, which is in line with female biological interests, but not with male interests. Over time, this destroys the biological integrity of a country. It’s not a grand conspiracy of women. It’s just the playing out of biological interests.
So feminism, with it’s push for female voting, it pursues female power, while destroying male power. The people who run the civilization, do all the work, competing for females on an already perilous biological footing…..men…they get socially downgraded by massive immigration, brought on by Matriarchy. That’s one of many reasons women were never in charge: Men in the past realized it was pointless putting women in charge, as they would only pursue their own interests, while degrading male interests. This of course would in time completely demoralize men and demotivate them. Why bother doing all the hard work to please her, when she will just bring in new men? When the price of pleasing females gets too high, men lose motivation.
How did we end up a Matriarchy? It’s actually really simple: We gave women the vote. That turned us into a Matriarchy. We Europeans may not survive that mistake. Women voting doesn’t work. Democracy with women voting doesn’t work. Women have been in charge a few generations, and have already wrecked our culture, and near destroyed it, genetically…..open borders, the welfare state….all paid for, by men, who must pay to bring in replacement populations of men, into their countries…..that’s Matriarchy. They genetically replace their men…..while getting their men to pay for it.
And the basic and simple reason democracy may not work, if we give the vote to women, is that women have different genetic interests than men. It’s not some evil scheme of women, that they deliberately set out to destroy democracy. It’s just that they evolved for maternal care of infants, and to basically adapt and spread their legs for whoever is in charge. Women didn’t evolve to protect territory, men did. Women didn’t have a need to have as much territorial instinct as men, because they can survive evolution quite nicely without it. That’s why the data shows that men are more patriotic as a group, than women. They have to be. Men sacrifice, men lead. That’s the way it has always been….till now.
And all these social patterns flow from the basics of mammalian evolution: Women have children, they chose among men, the men compete to please them, women monkey branch…..which tends to de-stabilize the monkey troop. This sets up a series of political problems, as men try to protect their genetic interest, while competing with other men, protecting territory and attaining social status to please females…..while keeping society stable. The best solution to these problems is Patriarchy, to date.
However, we have now flipped the basic evolutionary answer that has worked so well for so long, among virtually every human population and we are trying a new thing: putting women in charge.
So the genetic interest of women gets expressed at the ballot box. They vote in all kinds of entitlements for themselves, because women evolved as being economically dependent on men, as well as needing men’s protection. Put them in charge and there is no limit to what they want and demand of men. Give them the power to vote in those men who will give them what they want, and they will do it. More rights, more things, all the time. There is no end to it, if women rule and make up the rules.
And this means endless open borders, if the men will let them……Now mind you, I know perfectly well, this is not true of all women. If you know statistics, it doesn’t have to be. There is a lot of overlap between male and female voting, but the differences are at the margins due to sex difference, and those differences, small as they may be, they decide elections. Remember, most democratic elections are fairly close and women are about 53% of voters in most elections…..so they rule by proxy.
Endless large and expanding government, as women basically vote in a Substitute Husband, in the government, so they don’t have to rely on their husband, if they don’t want him…..is one of the things women vote in. Since women are in charge, the rules of disengagement, divorce and the court system are entirely rigged for her. The whole economy in fact, is a large display of catering to gynocentrism:
Men evolved to care for and protect women. But women did not evolve for protecting and caring for men. That’s the difference. And that’s the reason Matriarchy does not work. If men are in charge, they will look after women’s interests. If women are in charge they won’t look after men’s interest…..especially men’s genetic interests. Finally in late stages Matriarchy, women are so enamored with themselves, they don’t even bother having children, expecting men to solve that problem too. That’s the stage we are at now. I remember watching a speech by a German female politician who complained about the low German birth rate, then complained it was the men’s fault. “Nazis were not very good at making babies”….she said. No…..I thought….you aborted them all. Then I watched another speech by a German woman politician who said basically, well it’s over, Germany will be an Islamic Republic, nothing can be done about it…..just accept it, never once saying why it was that way. German women feel no responsibility to even do their genetic role in nature, to keep the population going, if they are allowed to run things. They live just for themselves. Women simply didn’t evolve to keep a civilization going. Not a knock on women, really. I just don’t think they evolved for it. That’s why there are almost no Matriarchies.
I always find it interesting, that in European history, the first born male was put in charge, to become King….not the first born female. Why was that? Bigotry against women? I don’t think so. It was wisdom born of long experience, that on average, men make better leaders. Why so? Because intuitively I think our European ancestors figured out, men protect territory and generally make better leaders. It doesn’t always work that way of course. Margaret Thatcher was the second greatest English Prime Minister of all time, after Sir Winston Churchill in my opinion. But inheritance of the English Throne, the rules were put in place, based on what generally worked the best. For a variety of reasons not the least of which is that women get pregnant and should be having children if the tribe is to survive, humans organized things so that men were generally in charge, for a very simple reason: That’s what works most often.
I’m afraid many of us have been duped by feminism to believe the genders are the same. We will have to learn some very bitter lessons before we correct ourselves, I suppose. Or, we could just listen to the wisdom of our ancestors, who would have laughed heartily if we told them these were our chiefs, protecting us.
Giving women the vote, it ended Patriarchy for good, in advanced nations. It sealed their fates. Women are now in charge. Most voters are women, they outlive men, they vote more often, they shape all government priorities, more than men do. The men at the top are just there, to do the bidding of the women….paid for by men, since men pay 70% of taxes, while women are the beneficiaries of 70% of government benefits….that’s how a Matriarchy works. European nations are now Matriarchies, not Patriarchies. Guess what? Matriarchies don’t survive evolution. Males evolved to protect the tribe. Look at the picture of the Defense Ministers of Europe. Do you feel safe? The genes that support Matriarchies, they don’t survive evolution. What survives evolution? Patriarchies…..genes that support Patriarchies, they survive.
And Islam is not at all subtle about it. Look at that picture of a Minaret at the top. Looks like a penis, doesn’t it? You don’t have to be a Viennese psychologist to figure this out….
Islam if anything, is deeply Patriarchal. Those genes will survive. Our European ones are disappearing, very quickly. I don’t think it’s a done deal, and it’s all over, not quite yet… unless we want it to be. But it soon will be too late to change. Some European women think it’s over, already. They can feel it. They have made their bet, by their actions. Those are the feminists that are allied politically, with Islam. Yes, that should tell you, we are close to crossing the genetic Rubicon. No going back, once we cross. I don’t think it’s ordained by evolution, but it’s definitely a choice and we should be clear how things work, and what’s at stake. Let’s be clear: Feminism is a death wish, because it is based on the idea of a Matriarchy. And that won’t work….Feminism rejects Patriarchy, even our very Light Patriarchy that we currently have, the very social form keeping women alive in European based civilizations. Men pretend to be in charge, women pull all the strings, men work to keep civilization going and they do all the hard things. Even this endless catering to women, while pretending men are in charge, white women reject that. Feminists want white men to keep society going, pay the bills, while bringing in replacements for the white men. The feminist war on white men continues. Don’t care? If you chose to be indifferent to the fate of your branch of the human race, that’s our choice, I guess….
Stare into the abyss and take a jump, if you’d like.
Is this a crazy explanation? Not really. Muammer Gaddafi will be proven right, if nothing changes fairly soon. It’s just a matter of time and math. One population is out-breeding the other and will replace it. There is nothing more to it, than that. Feminism is about empowering women, educating them, delaying marriage, focusing on money. When that happens, when you empower women, the birth rate plunges. Then new populations are brought in, to make up for the children that highly educated European women didn’t bother having. They are too busy being empowered, to replace the population. Feminism and Matriarchy is good for a generation or two, then it runs out of babies and the society collapses. Patriarchal societies tell women to have children and the men are in charge. So they breed a lot. And Europe, because it is run by women, is a Matriarchy. Women are nice. That’s the problem. They want to be nice to the new arrivals and European women vote in governments that take tax money from European men, since men pay most taxes. Then the Matriarchy gives that money to Muslim men, for living expenses, to breed and to make replacement new Europeans for the children that Europeans are not bothering to have. The Matriarchy, they also take money from European men, then bring in boat loads of genetic replacements replacements from the Third World, for the children they didn’t bother having.
It’s up to European women to decide: Should white people go on? If you decide yes, your men will support you, but it means you don’t get to spend your 20s and 30s drinking, going to college, mostly focusing on working, then maybe having one child. It means European women must decide, they want children and family….or else we die as a race.
Note: there are many things here, that I stated as fact. They underlie my argument. For anyone interested in political patterns and voting patterns, it has been known for decades that the female voting patterns are different than the male voting patterns. This information is easily verifiable.
Anyone who wonders if virtually all human societies in the past have been Patriarchal in nature, can talk to an anthropologist or a feminist scholar, to confirm that yes, the feminists are correct that all past human societies have been essentially Patriarchal in nature. I contend this is a natural pattern that humans will return to…..very soon as you will see in the video below. Feminists contend they can do away with that pattern and become essentially a Matriarchy. I don’t think the science supports that notion, but time will tell. Link to my basic view on evolution and Patriarchy:
Anyone familiar with the science of sex differences as well as anthropology is welcome to go test my assumptions, to see if the scientific data on gender differences, if they support my notions, such as:
-do women monkey branch?
-do human females have personality traits that are different than men, such as things which might be considered more compassionate?….more open to immigrants and voting for governments that let them in?
-has this been a problem humans have had to solve, because it is socially destabilizing?
-was religion the way humans solved this problem in the past?
Also: do men really pay most of the taxes? Do women vote in governments to take money from men, give it to migrants to breed? All this is verifiable information.
Is cultural suicide a crazy thing to do? You decide….but let’s be clear: that’s what is happening.
So we Europeans rejected Christianity and those that kept it, we feminized it. We got rid of God and with it, the evolutionary adaptation of Patriarchy…..then we gave women the vote.
Will we survive this series of bad decisions? Not likely in my opinion.
All I ask:
Don’t blame the Muslims. Look in the mirror, white European man…there, your trouble lies and stares you in the face. Cheers.
Leave a reply
2 comments on 'Islam, Europeans and Evolution and Patriarchy…'