Immigration in the Next 100 Years Save for later Reblog
My Immigration Ideas, for the next 100 years, for America:
-Build the Wall!
-shut down immigration from Mexico, for 100 years
My reasoning: we need to close the border, to the south. We have enough Mexicans. They inter-marry often with whites. Give it a few generations, to sort out our problems, integrate populations, build our country up, so we don’t become another shit-hole, like San Francisco is becoming.
Jordan Peterson has a good opinion on this. Start at beginning of video: “Borders are reasonable. How about that? The law is the border that stops someone from stealing your laptop. If it’s an Apple laptop, then it’s the sort of laptop that a Social Justice Warrior would carry. And then, the Social Justice Warrior, is going to be very irritated if you happen to purloin their laptop. And then you might point out to them, you know, it’s a border that protects you from having that thing taken. And they say, well the border should be open. <then you tell the SJW> It’s ok. No problem, you hand over that laptop right now! And everything else you own, too, if you don’t like borders. And you can get rid of the walls in your damn house, and you don’t need doors on your bedroom either. And we can keep an eye on you whenever we want. And so much for borders!”
-adopt Trump’s plan of “skills based immigration”
-continue to seek out high skilled, high education immigrants
-focus immigration favorable on high IQ countries
-let in fewer immigrants from low IQ countries
-federal rules changes that favor online education
-cut government funding to universities that inhibit free speech
-increase government funding to universities that encourage free speech
-tie government funding to universities to a requirement, to put all education, all courses, online
-get rid of multi-culturalism and focus on encouraging immigrants to fit in
-get rid of the Google monopoly
We have enough dumb people in America. We need more smart people to cope with the scientific challenges of the 21st Century, which will be all about science. Skills based immigration, which Trump pushes, acts as effectively an IQ screening device. If we require people that come here to be high skilled, guess what? High skilled people tend to be pretty smart…just what we need.
There are unfortunately, a lot of variations in human intelligence, globally, among different populations. While there are smart people in every country, every race and religion, there are large group variations. This means focusing our immigration selection process on high IQ countries….East Asian countries, makes more sense, if we are to build an advanced economy. Birth rates in high IQ white European countries are so low, don’t expect a lot of immigrants from there.
Exceptions should be made for high IQ people, in any country, even the worst shit-holes.
Get rid of multi-culturalism, because when you mix races, they must have a lot in common, or your culture will eventually blow up. All cultures survive, on what people have in common, not on what they have, that separates them. Multiculturalism is destructive, to social peace. Teach a core “American” curriculum, not the politically correct anti-white hatred we have now, as the core of our “education”.
Cutting government funding to universities that inhibit free speech, while increasing funding to universities that promote free speech is important, because the core principle of our culture is free speech. There is no negotiation on this. Plus, it’s quite practical. Free speech lets us think through our problems and have a better grasp of reality…just like this video by BPS does…..and a better grasp of reality, in the long run, helps us solve our problems and remain peaceful.
Federal rule changes that favor online education are part of the promotion of free speech, because universities are mostly money-making entities for the educational elite. They need competition, to drive down prices and loosen their control over society. Jordan Peterson is trying to start an online university and is talking to people in Silicon Valley about it. He once said that, properly done, online education could cut education costs, by 90%. This would tremendously weaken the stranglehold that mostly progressive universities have over education…..this ties into immigration, because in order for a multi-racial society to remain cohesive, we need more free speech, not less. Education choice helps that, as new online education would mean more “classical liberal education”…would come back.
Getting rid of the Google monopoly is an essential part of maintaining free speech, which is the basis of our culture and the thing that unites us, and allows us to work through our problems.
The reason we need to tie government funding to universities, to a requirement to put all courses online, is obvious: The public should be able to monitor what is being taught to our young people. The kind of horseshit pumped out in “Gender Studies” and “Women’s Studies” is toxic and ruining our culture. Make federal financial funding to universities contingent on those institutions putting everything online, where the public can monitor it and give feedback. Bad ideas will die. Good ideas will flourish. Sunlight is the best disinfectant!
Building a better future means more highly educated people. The very high IQ people in any and every population, their talents are generally lost, in shit-hole countries, that can’t utilize the intelligence of these people. Suppose there is a black guy in the poorest country in Africa, that happens to have an IQ greater than Einstein had, but he lives in a tin shack in a shantytown. I know these people exist. I met a black guy in Africa, never went to school, he spoke 5 languages, picked them up, talking to tourists. Brilliant guy, he told me a story about how he took Michael Jordan on a tour of a game park. We talked and enjoyed a Coca-Cola together, looking out over the savanna, looking at lions and elephants and rhinos. We need to seek brilliant people out, bring them here. But the key is, be picky. Be fussy about who we let in, just like you would not let anyone into your house. You would not let anyone stay in your house as long as you want, without you wanting them to be there.
Sorry if I sound like a high I.Q. snob, but there is a reason for my opinion, and it is based on compassion and practicality: Focusing on bringing in more intelligent people means that America can create the technology this century, to help the people in the rest of the planet, have good lives. This is already being done, to some extent, in Silicon Valley. The world is a big place. I’ve been around the planet. Lots of room for everyone. No need for everyone to move to America or Europe or Japan. Advanced nations should take in mostly talented people, then build the technology that allows various human populations to remain in place, where they have been for thousands of years, have good lives, right there. Mass immigration will lead to social instability and eventual race wars. Helping every human have a good life, in their own country, will lead to social peace. The key is developing good technology, to help our fellow humans. That’s why we need more talented people: to develop the technology we need, so all of us can have better lives. For example: We need to encourage more of this sort of thing:
One comment on 'Immigration in the Next 100 Years'