Ignoring the elephant in the room: My comments will make more sense if you have watched “The Thinkery” video, above…..My attempt at combing humor with science and social speculation….
Women used to have “fainting couches” and special “fainting rooms”, in the 19th Century…now they have “Trigger Warnings” and “Safe Spaces”.
From wiki on the possible origin of the need for the fainting couch “Female hysteria. <an early form of SJW behavior> The second most common theory for the predominance of fainting couches is home treatment of female hysteria through manual pelvic massage by home visiting doctors and midwives, <to relieve her symptoms>. As a “disease” that needed constant, recurring (usually weekly) in-home treatment with a procedure that through manual massage could sometimes take hours, creating specialized furniture for maximum comfort during the extended procedure seems likely, as does the later creation of fainting rooms for privacy during the intimate massage procedure.”
So, whereas in the current year, we tend to now laugh at SJW s, in more compassionate Victorian times a doctor would help these unfortunate women out, pay a home visit to an SJW, and using his hand and earlier versions of the common dildo, would massage the pelvic area of an irate hysterical woman. Unfortunately our current medical system does not yet recognize SJW-feminist behavior as a treatable medical condition, and current health care plans don’t cover it, nor does Obamacare.
Anyhow, understanding the condition:
Social Justice inter-sectional types are concerned with racism, misogyny, trans-phobia, sexism, homophobia…so they say. They will bring about a better world, so they say…They will ban “harmful gender stereotypes” in adverts…so they say.
The elephant in the room, is that the SJW s, they are almost 100% women. That’s significant, for figuring out what’s at play here. A few low end Beta males sniffing around the SJW set, agreeing with feminist nonsense, but no normal men. What this tells us about evolution, is the elephant in the room.
Here’s what it tells me:
-women think of themselves collectively as an interest group
-women are born to be moral busybodies
-women like to impose morality on everyone
-women think it’s their prerogative to tell everyone what is right and wrong
-female morality seems to center around care and protection of the vulnerable
-women are very easily offended, compared to men
-women have very little sense of, what a man would call, “a sense of humor”
-the fact that it is pretty much all women doing this sort of thing tells me, there is something fundamentally different between men and women
-women think they are morally superior to men
-women’s morality seems to be centered around “feelings” more than anything, it seems fairly subjective and emotion based, compared to a man
-women, much more than men, are worried about equality of outcome, rather than equality of opportunity
-words seem to have more significance for women, than men
-small bands of insane women can run amok in society, doing great damage
We can pretend, if we want, that this is just some loony left wing authoritarian feminist thing, exclusively. No it’s not. Not all women are like this, but this definitely has something to do with gender, being a female. It’s about how people are born, how the genders evolved, different from one another. Men don’t act like the women in the Sargon video. Why is that?
Women see themselves as a collective unit. That’s why they tend to vote in big government, which looks after women, as a group. In men, this behavior is far less common. In the United States, men tend to vote Republican, which is more individualistic, women tend to vote Democrat, which emphasizes women being looked after, as a group…often at the expense of men, naturally.
Women are moral busybodies. They evolved that way. It’s no different today in the workplace, than in a 19th Century Anglican Church, in rural England. Women in both places set about imposing their own set of moral codes on the community. In Victorian England it was “moral decency” arising supposedly out of studying the Bible. Today it’s “political correctness” that comes from studying the moral codes, within feminism. Same shit, different century.
Women like to tell everyone what is right and wrong….as in the sentence “Women can be bossy”…And for a woman, “right and wrong” in female morality, usually is about looking after the ‘vulnerable’…. For most of evolution, this impulse was properly oriented for a female: She got married or at least mated young, looked after infants. In the natural state of having children, it’s useful for women to be moral busybodies, for children need an adult in the room. Anyone who has followed Donald Trump’s political career should know that. Unfortunately women have few if any children now, and turn their maternal instincts, which are properly evolved for children, onto the nearest set of unfortunate men, who happen to be unlucky enough to work with these politically correct feminist women. The women, now working in corporations instead of rural churches, the women manage the men around them, treating them like infants, which endlessly annoys the men around them.
Jordan Peterson once speculated that perhaps people need to start thinking about, that female instincts may play out politically differently, than do male evolved instincts….now that women have the vote, are the majority of voters, so they pretty much decide the nature of the whole political system. He said so, ever so cautiously, prefacing it by saying he was aware that he may be attacked by the feminists, for suggesting such a thing. Apparently Professor Peterson, who grew up in a Christian home and went to church, apparently he must have paid attention to the women of the church, and how they behaved. Also apparently, Professor Peterson is aware that women who are over-arching moral busybodies, they do not like you pointing that out that fact to them, nor specifying that truth, with examples of behavior, or perish the thought, facts, reason and evidence, which stares most men in the face, every day.
Women evolved to care for the vulnerable, meaning children. Now that having children is unfashionable, and likely a sign that the woman is oppressed by “The Patriarchy”, so the childless, barren modern woman turns her natural maternal instincts onto Save the Whale, or Animal Rights campaigns, or she votes in governments to let in more refugees from the Third World by the millions, to make up for the children she could not be bothered having, since she didn’t want to be oppressed by Patriarchy. Naturally men pick up the tab for her moral laziness and Virtue Signalling, as men pay most taxes, and look after the teeming unemployable millions, brought in.
So men pick up the tab, while men are actively discriminated against, as Sargon points out. Men are discriminated against so badly, the feminists in Britain have screwed men over so badly, so shut out of the system by attacks on men that men are now a minority group at university, who must be helped.
How much wasted male talent there is out there, that never gets used, is hard to judge but is likely immense. Men would likely dominate at university, as they did in the past, but in the new feminist world, men must be beaten down, while women are built up. This seems to be a basic female instinct.
What should the proper male to female ratio, be at university, based on talent alone? Well, if we look at IQ data, for people with an IQ over 130, it is roughly 2:1 in favor of males. We lower standards and actively discriminate against men, in order to allow women to dominate against men at university.
We let women win at university, because they are women. We water down standards, we introduce all sorts of nonsense like “Gender Studies” in order to make women feel smarter than they are, and we include dumb or not terribly smart women into the mix, in order to please women and make them feel good about themselves. Men need to start being honest to women, about that. Not all women wish to beat down men, but toxic femininity seems to be quite real, and radical feminist really hate men. That’s something most men have trouble wrapping their minds around. We accept male ability to hate, as a thing…disgusting as it is. But our protective instincts towards women makes it a sort of taboo to be honest about female hatred of men, rampant in feminism. And of course, to hide the truth, toxic femininity comes with a nice shiny veneer of moral superiority, over men:
Anyone who has been around the SJW-feminist types knows the sense of unearned moral superiority that comes with her. It seems to be baked, right into the cake, as it were. She would like you to know, she’s the sensitive one, she’s the caring one, she’s the good one. Whereas you as a male, are not. In times when Christianity was still generally practiced, these same instincts for female self-righteousness came out in Biblical form, with certain people being “sinners” and other like herself, bound for Heaven, with great glory, for her magnificent moral character. Today of course, instead of telling men that they are going straight to hell, women just say that the men suffer from “toxic masculinity”. It’s quite similar to the Christian concept of “original sin”….combined with “eternal damnation”.
So the lesson for men is that while most women are not like that, small roving bands of feminist lunatics have taken over the institutions. With big mouths, they have done much damaged and must be opposed. Men are wired by nature, to protect women, but like a doctor in a loony bin has no choice but to restrain a few female patients, or 19th Century physicians felt they had no choice, but to make home visits to the SJW s of that Victorian era, to relieve them of their symptoms. So too, today’s young men have to find new strategies to save us all, from lunatic women.
Man up boys. It will be unpleasant for a while, but we need to start telling women the truth.
Let’s talk about “words”….Words, yes words. Let’s talk about emotional nuance of language. Many men are dunces about this. A lot are not. Everyone has some understanding of emotional nuance and the subtlety of language, but women seem to have a lot more of this, as a group, than do men. Their brains seem to be wired that way….for language and emotional nuance. That may have been important in evolution, in the care and feeding and watering of young children and in getting along with other women in the tribe, where they spent most of evolution. Even at one day old, a female baby stares more at faces than things, whereas a male baby stares more at things, than faces. It’s an evolutionary adaptation of females. Being physically smaller, weaker, more vulnerable, they adapted to read nuance and language subtlety, better than men do. It’s a clue that Patriarchy is a natural evolved human response to sexual dimorphism. It’s how our bodies evolved and our evolutionary differences shaped the nature of power and the political system. A propensity and need for lots of subtle social interaction and emotional nuance and care with people seems to be not a social construct, but a deep biological impulse, more common among women, than men. It’s how women survived evolution. This is good, except: This otherwise healthy impulse of concern for emotional vulnerability can metastasize, if not properly channeled. It can get out of hand and lead to female hysteria, or eventually full-blown SJW feminist activism, if not channeled properly into it’s natural evolutionary conclusions and social structure, of the feeding and care of young children.
The reason feminism has turned cancerous is that women have been nudged out of their natural biological role as mothers.
Milo Y led the way, years ago, when he correctly diagnosed the problem and proclaimed “Feminism is cancer”. Milo’s friend Sargon now has taken a public stance many times, against cancer. You should too. Speak up, wherever you are. Cancer is not good. Cancer is bad….m’kay? Get female allies on campus and in the workplace, who are also opposed to cancer. It is much easier for a woman to attack another woman, than it is for a man to do so. So in that way, feminism is a peculiar kind of social cancer, that might be treated by a combination of male and female cooperation. Karen Straughan is a leading advocate of male-female coordination and cooperation, in fighting this social cancer. Check out her videos.
In all this 3rd Flush SJW feminism, there is a moral earnestness and seriousness, that comes with it. As anyone who ever tried standup comedy knows, you don’t insult women, just are only allowed to insult men. Women are easily offended. They insist they are equal, except you have to be nicer to then, than you are to men. And Christopher Hitchens, the old sexist, once said, “Women are not funny”. Naturally, no women saw any humor in his statement, and were unaware of their own lack of perception of humor, thus proving his point. Humor and logic and self-awareness don’t seem to be female strong-points…but what do I know? I’m just a male, who attended church, growing up, and watched the women. But of course, all these comments of mine, must be “poppycock” because feminists have assured us, for a long time, that men and women are exactly the same, and everything from athletic ability to a sense of humor, to gender roles, are all a “social construct”. Move along, nothing to see here…..Write your Congressman, is all I can say, and insist that “female hysteria” be included, under Obamacare…
Remember: compassion and humor is the best policy, when dealing with the mentally ill, so don’t be vicious to feminists. But be aware, there is an elephant in the loony room. In time, our young comedians like Nimesh Patel will help us figure out how to deal with them. Eventually feminists will be laughed out of existence: