Hurt Save for later Reblogpost

TimBucks
@TimBucks

Send Private MessageSubscribe50

Women are wired to personalize life….solipsism…a bit more than men. They are wired for emotion….on average, more than men. That’s why they ask “Who hurt you?”…it’s how they evolved. Nothing wrong with that. In fact it’s good. Female mammals helped humans survive evolution, by caring for our young, being perceptive about everyone’s emotions….it’s an essential survival strategy for humans.

And of course, that’s also why feminism ignores biology, nature and evolution and would rather seek explanation in the personal, the emotional, the human….by blaming men for everything. Feminism is about perceiving all of reality, through the lens of emotion. That’s why it has such weak explanatory power, over reality. It’s not that emotions are unimportant. They are very important. It’s just that, they can explain very little. By only listening to emotions, we understand very little.

Ignoring all of nature, feminists constructed a theory about how all men are horrible human beings, men are sub-par women, being female is better than being male, men are responsible for every ailment a woman ever had, men are the cause of any and all bad things in the world…..”The Patriarchy”

Trouble is, inter-sectional feminists think men in general are wired….or should be wired… the same way as women and that there is something wrong with men, if they don’t perceive life this way….as they do. Boys need re-training so they can be turned into proper little girls, so feminist theory goes….And that is just madness.

Men are most systematic in their perceptions. They tend to prefer order and patterns more than women. Men are slightly less wired for emotion than females….on average. That’s why men like to ask deeper questions, look for explanatory power. Questions like, what happened? What happened in general? What is the pattern? Men are wired to understand things, how they work. That’s because men, more than women, were the hunters. Men being tasked with being hunters in evolution meant men more than women, were physically interacting with a broader physical world, more than women, in evolution. Women tended to stick around fire and hearth and children….where faces, people and emotions rule the day, as anyone with young children could testify.

That evolutionary division of interest and labor and necessity are why boys like video games, more than girls…and boys make better scientists and mechanics, and invented everything. Science, civilization and eventually the modern world, was not some sort of conspiracy of men against women. It was instead the playing out of sexual dimorphism, slight sexual and biological differences between men and women.

Women chose men in evolution, the men who could protect them. All these things led to more men than women, on average tend to be more often be really smart, really curious about the world, men like to explain things, take them apart….see how they work. Men were not afforded the luxury in evolution, of indulging their emotions…so they didn’t. They were too busy protecting women and children, allowing and affording women the luxury of being able to worry about their emotions.

And what did all of this evolutionary scenario eventually lead to in evolution? Science….and the computer you are using. Men learn things. They integrate those experiences so they don’t experience the same pain again. A man touches a fire or hot stone remembers that hot stone. Women do too, it’s just that this tendency is a bit stronger in men, than women.

This is seen in young humans and young apes. Give young humans….male and female….a choice of trucks or dolls to pick up, more often than not, the young male will chose a truck, whether than male is an ape, or a human.

Jordan Peterson has pointed out that in Scandinavia, the most feminist countries in the world, after several decades of very active feminist government intervention, to get boys into girls occupations, girls into boys occupations…it hasn’t worked. In fact, it’s had the opposite effect: More than a few decades ago when this feminist intervention started, Scandinavian boys tended to even more than the past, pursue typically male occupations, while Scandinavian girls tended to even more than in the past, pursue typically female occupations. Females have a general preference for people, males have a general preference for things. One is not superior than the other, both are essential biological strategies and tendencies, for both halves of the human race. They only foolishness in this, is lack of perception on the part of feminists, that this is how the biological world really works….the yin and yang.

Remember, that females bled in pain, in their periods, for endless millennia, till a man, who never had a period in his life, said enough of this, I’ll help women, then he invented the tampon. Tell a feminist to thank a man, next time she has a period. Modern tampons are a big improvement on the elephant or crocodile dung the ancient Egyptians used. In most of human history there was a 40-50% child mortality rate, till men invented modern medicine. Visit a graveyard from the 1800s you will find many, many children buried….unlike modern graveyards, where most of the dead lived a long time. Now, mothers no longer have to regularly bury their children in their 20s. I’m sure all these women who lost their children were very emotional. It must have been a mountain of pain for them, to bury their children. Abe Lincoln buried several of his. But it was a man who fixed this.

Men get hurt all the time, when they pursue women. And women get hurt all the time too. Nothing wrong with pain. There are lessons to be learned from it. What did you learn from your pain?