How Progressives fuel the Alt-Right Save for later Reblogpost

TimBucks
@TimBucks

Send Private MessageSubscribe50

What will cause the growth of the alt-right and white supremacists in the coming decades, is changes in demographics. Basically white people are the only major racial demographic, in steep decline, as a percentage of the world population total. This is not conjecture as far as I know, but pretty much accepted by mainstream demographers.

And depending on how it’s handled, the face of Europe or North America in a few decades, could look very different, than they do today. Anyone familiar with basic history knows that there is no human history of one group being supplanted by another, without violence. Whether you are pro or anti immigration, can anyone say with a straight face, that all will be well, that there is no chance of conflict? We all know the answer, to that.

So then, how do we maintain peace? That’s what we all want. In light of what is happening in Europe and in Trump’s building of a Wall, I don’t think anyone on the left or the right at this point, believes peace is guaranteed, when you have massive demographic transformation.

The reasons for these demographic changes are debatable, whether it is good or bad is debatable, but the fact that it is happening is not debatable, far as I know. For instance: Whites will be a minority in America, within a few decades. Time Magazine saw this coming, decades ago, when I first read about it.

The basic trend: In 1950 whites were about 30% of world population, but in a few decades they will be around 9% of world population. Africans were about 9% of world population, a few decades ago, but in a few decades, they will be around 30% of world population.

And everyone in Africa has figured out, based on the news, that you can just walk into Europe. Africa is a big mess right now. High population growth, bad governments.

The basic potential problem: The governments of “white countries” are encouraging mass migration and immigration, to “white” countries, without bothering to get the OK of their population. And the mainstream media, controlled mostly by leftists, shout down anyone opposed to these changes and calls them “racist”…..and in my opinion, that’s fueling the alt-right.

My own opinion is that demographic changes should be a matter of public will, in any given country. If the Japanese hold a referendum and decide to become an Arab country, I have no problem with their decision. If Britain holds a referendum and most people decide they don’t mind Britain becoming a non-white country, I have no problem with their decision.

What I am opposed to, is governments, largely controlled by leftists radicals, imposing demographic population changes on the population, without their consent. And I am opposed to governments doing what they are doing now, which is: not discussing the implications of current demographic trends and immigration policies, in an open and honest manner.

All people, of all races and religions, have a right to demographic and cultural self-determination.

All this non-vetted population change is fueling the growth of the alt-right, in my opinion, and will continue to fuel it’s growth for decades to come. And heaven forbid, if past history is any guide, and if it leads to massive racial or religious violence, as populations get replaced, it will be the fault of the left. The left are bringing it on, because they know full well what they are doing, and know full well that the public was not informed, not consulted, not asked for their approval. And the public not even talked to, about the changes, in an open honest manner.

The public is just fed pablum slogans like “Diversity is our Strength”

Is there a long term strategy to destroy the West, by nefarious people?

If such a strategy for the long term social collapse of the West exists, it will likely fail. Massive number of immigrants from Africa will cause a terrible backlash…..imo. I don’t think anyone could have predicted the massive rise in population in Africa. Will several billion people come into Europe, genetically displace the European population? To me it doesn’t seem likely, without an accompanying race war…..which no decent human being of any race wants.

But in the short run, European governments are going full tilt on population replacement of whites, just like the video above says. However, in an ironic twist of fate, left wing progressives, who say they are anti-racist, are likely seeding the ground for a race war in Europe. I certainly don’t want that, but I predict it will happen, and when it does, it will be the fault of the progressives. Perhaps it’s at the root of it, a subconscious wish the left has, for massive death and destruction. They certainly are doing everything possible, to encourage genocide. Population replacements never happen without genocide, any student of history knows this. So in all honesty, I believe that’s what the progressives want: genocide and a race war. Hopefully their insanity can be stopped with as little bloodshed as possible. My main contention is that whatever most people want, as far as immigration goes, is what is moral. My own sentiments are quite a bit to the liberal sentiment, I like a real mix of people, but I believe more strongly in democracy and respecting the wishes of the majority. Population replacement is happening, fueled by the progressive elites, and it will end in disaster and bloodshed. There should be no moral doubt, when it happens, whose fault it is: progressive liberals.

Of course, the Alt-Right analysis of population implosion of the West, plus the Demographic Replacement, it overlooks many other contributing factors for that population implosion, which I explore here:

https://linkyou.blog/feminism-technology-and-evolution/

Also, the population implosion in advanced countries means a massive deficit of people in “White Countries” as white women are not having children. That means that the future economic system, including pensions, is all compromised. So it’s all about money. And to make up for the deficit, governments bring in large numbers of immigrants. What else are governments to do? Tell white women to have more children? White women, especially feminists, say that having children is nothing but a personal choice, having no social ramifications. Of course that is foolish nonsense, but most white men don’t bother challenging that feminist narrative. It’s easy to blame feminists for their stupidity, as they are mentally deficient, but that does not remove the moral responsibility for European men, to challenge feminist’s erroneous, socially destructive narrative. Part of this is a reluctance to criticize women. As a gender, they get a free pass, no criticism is socially allowed. That’s insane and leads to problems festering over decades, destroying the social fabric. So my  comment is about blame. Too much alt-right stuff is about blaming other people…..immigrants, feminists, minorities. And too little is about responsibility for challenging false narratives…..and challenging feminist women in particular. I’d say white men have no one to blame, but themselves, if their cultures are destroyed.

Another point is about solutions. If European countries would like to keep their genetic inheritance intact, then in light of the technological changes mentioned in the link on feminism, technology and evolution, economic policies will have to be re-written, so they are functional for the age we live in. This starts with understanding the problems, then looking for solutions. Here is one possible solution, dealing with the problem with tax credits….explained in the following post…. Although you will agree I’m being a bit crude in this link, I think I got it right, as far as solutions go:

https://linkyou.blog/shooting-babies-out-of-her-ass/

Being a Mother with 4 or 5 kids should be a lucrative career option for women. Just one or two kids means the woman is barely keeping the population alive, but with three or four, or five, the woman is making a substantial economic contribution to the future, more than making up the money we help her with. And women evolved to do this. Many would be quite happy with this option.

“Call it a MCTC if you like: Marginal Child Tax Credit. Economists would obviously have to work out the level of detail and sophistication needed for this, so extensive detail is beyond the scope of this limited narrative, which is mostly conceptual. But mostly things like Tax Credits and Pension Contributions for Mothers, paid for by the rest of the taxpayers and help with housing costs would do the most good. It should all be calculated on the probable economic benefit for society down the road, based on the number of children a woman has, past 2. So done this way, it can be fully funded by the Mother herself. This works if her net economic contribution is calculated on a more realistic basis: On the basis of including the probable economic contribution of her children, past the two children minimum, into an economic assessment of a Mother’s probable economic contribution. As her children grow up, get educated and work, in a few decades, they contribute taxes and most will be productive. That’s a large net economic gain, for society. That’s the economic justification for the MCTC. Since most women now, with modern choices, only have 1 or occasionally 2 children, since this is driving down the birth rate far below replacement level and will cause enormous social problems down the road, we either do something like this, or continue to import future voters, future workers…..for the children we are not bothering to have. Modern women now have a choice: to work and have fewer children…or none. Or to have a lot of children and probably be poor and stressed. Most women take the first choice. Women need better choices, unless we want our population replaced, from outside immigration. Done this way, it’s not a giveaway. It can be a very solid, provable, self-funding economic investment for the whole country.”

Research indicates both that the birth rate is too low, we are going to run into serious demographic implosion, according to Elon Musk in his video “No More Kids”. Research also indicates that about 20% of women would like to be nothing but full time Mothers. Provided she pumps out lots of kids, why not? The female role in nature, whether human or elephant, is to keep the tribe going. In the pre-technological era, basically before 1900, we could count on continually rising population levels occurring naturally. Due to things like the invention of birth control, modern education and the modern economy, that is no longer true and advanced technological societies are in demographic free-fall and are imploding….and they are importing massive numbers of immigrants from incompatible cultures. All this may lead to civil war. It’s not that hard to turn this around. Just pay women to “shoot babies out of their ass.”

Professor Peterson recently mentioned the horrible rise in antisemitism, which I also think is horrible. Where is this coming from? Mostly hatred of George Soros. Unfortunately George Soros is Jewish, and very very rich, and his “Open Society” foundations is funding the promotion of these demographic changes. People on the right are aware of this and unfortunately this brings out antisemitism and Jewish people get blamed. However, don’t blame the Jews. Even the government of Israel hates the guy.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-hungary-soros/israel-backs-hungary-says-financier-soros-is-a-threat-idUSKBN19V1J4

Blaming Jews is a waste of time. Yes they are over-represented in left-wing political causes, for reasons I explore in another blog, but to imagine they control everything is to divest yourself of personal responsibility, making yourself weak. It’s a false narrative.

https://linkyou.blog/richard-spencer-is-full-of-crap/

I think that if governments change demographics, which have been in place for thousands of years in the case of Europe, and change whole cultures and populations, without consulting those populations, this is fascist. That’s why I think the left is fascist. The United States is a bit more complex as it was originally founded by Europeans, who took the land from another race. We are evolving into a multi-racial society, but the same principle applies: all people should be given a say, as to the rate of change and what kind of demographic change, we can support.

If people are consulted in an open, honest manner and if they approve current levels of immigration, then I have no problem with this. In fact my general feeling is in general immigration is a good thing, but has to be done much more carefully and much more slowly. So it’s not really MY opinion I’m pushing here. On some level I’m just equal to everyone else. What I’m pushing is the general will, of most people, should prevail on this.

To pretend that wholesale immigration does not in fact, have the capacity to go very, very wrong, is to be completely blind and ignorant of history and of human nature, in my opinion. Immigration could be a very good thing, or a very bad thing, depending on how it’s handled, is my general opinion. I think it’s about getting the balance right, between order and chaos.

If you are familiar with the work of Professor Jordan Peterson, you are familiar that he thinks there is a balance in life, between order and chaos. And he thinks there are natural born “conservative types” and “liberal types”. Liberal types are more comfortable with change, conservative types, less so.

And my guess is that we have different personality types in any given population, and this is the key to figuring out what to do about immigration and changing demographics. Some people are more open, and these people are natural liberals. Some people are more closed and rule oriented by nature, and those people tend to be more conservative and less open to change.

So I don’t even think “racism” is the core issue, when talking about immigration or demographic changes. The important thing is to understand, there are naturally occurring personality types in any given population, and that’s why there is a balance between order and chaos, in a population…that must be achieved. Today, we have too much chaos, too much change, and in my view that’s why Trump got in, that’s why you see the rise of nationalism world-wide, that’s why you see the rise of the alt-right. People intuitively feel that there is too much change, and the balance between order and chaos has been lost.

And “too much change” simply means too much demographic change.

So things are changing, both sides can agree on that.

But an important thing that both sides need to agree on is, how to handle those changes?

My view:

The way to mediate demographic changes is through freedom, public open debate, free speech and free will choice on major issues…and not sneaky, back door changes, by the elites, under cover of darkness…which we currently have. We currently have none of the needed open debate in the West, about all these changes, so we may be headed for trouble.

“Liberals”  are not even aware that they are the ones fueling the alt-right…..by ignoring the opinions of the right, by suppressing free speech, by ignoring the balance between the left and the right, by imposing changes on people, without their consent.

However, let me pull back a bit from that harsh criticism of the left. The reality underlying that statement about liberals is this:

People on the left often think conservatives are “racists”, and people on the right think liberals are “insane’. Both are inaccurate perceptions, in my view, and arise from using the wrong filter, to understand what is going on. Using the filter of personality types in a population, leads to a more accurate perception of reality, in my opinion.

We need free speech and a balance between order and chaos, to sustain our peace.

Whatever side you are on, let’s hope we come to common rules, to sort out these changes. With common agreed upon rules, we can all live in peace.