A gynecologist knows all about a woman’s vagina. Gynocentric men cater to women. Gyno-Economics is about how men cater to women, in the economic system.
Gyno-economics explained: Men pay 70% of all taxes. Women are the beneficiaries of 70% of all tax money. 70% of the economy is consumer purchases, and women make 80% of all consumer purchases. Men as a group earn 30% more than women, but most men with any money, will have kids with a woman at some point, so they end up paying a woman’s bills. The money he earns make will usually end up paying her bills. Many women are blind to this. They take it for granted….So much for the illusion that men earn more than women do. No they don’t. Men get the money, women spend it. Feminists call this arrangement “the oppression of women”….whereby a man works his entire life, to support her lifestyle, to pay her bills, to work with her, then at the end of it, he is hated as an “oppressor” by uncomprehending feminists, who can’t see what is in front of their face….that’s the essence of feminism. Even if you do not get married, there is no escape: The men who don’t give their money to women directly in a marriage, those men are taxed.
True story: Bob, a friend of mine had a teenage daughter Ruth, years ago. Bob worked in a trade in Alaska…..outside often, in the bitter cold, for decades. He was self-employed in a one man niche electrical business, made a good living and was planning to pass on the business to his son Bob Jr……Ruth, Bob’s daughter, found out her brother was getting the business when Bob retired, and she was furious and started spouting off all sorts of feminist platitudes about how unfair that was. We were discussing this in the living room at Bob’s house. I was planning on riding around with Bob that day, so I looked outside at the snow, looked at the thermometer on the window, I looked out at the bitter cold, I turned to Ruth and said, “You want to come out with Bob and me? We are going to do some work, out in the field?….Ruth looked at the outside, realized how cold it was and said no thanks! I laughed. Later on, Bob Jr. took over the business, got married and supported a family on his earnings. Looking back, I realized that Ruth had watched her dad go out in the bitter cold, for years, making money, didn’t realize the sacrifice he made for everyone else. All she saw in her head was a feminist narrative, not reality. She could watch a man go out in the cold for decades, without realizing what he was doing, only thinking of herself.
That’s what feminism does to women.
I still remember that very second, when Ruth had been bitching about how “unfair” it was, that her brother got to inherit the business, and then Ruth looked outside and realized for the first time, inheriting the business meant going outside and working in the cold. At that instant, the lights went on, in Ruth’s eyes….she understood the truth. I remember the look of realization, in Ruth’s eyes, that very second. I laughed when I saw the lights finally go on…..Ruth didn’t bitch much about this, after this moment of “enlightenment”….lol
“Legions of feminists will ferociously type smash the patriarchy! at their Internet rallies, calling out for the end of the male supremacy in all spheres of life. Yet, few of them acknowledge the fact that one of these spheres, the government (the institution granting them rights), is entirely funded by male taxpayers. Economically, women cost more to the state than they benefit. The government is literally paying women to be alive. As such, strong independent women are only that way because the state is transferring money from men to them. Feminists are not seriously against being dependent on men, they are just against men having the full control over their money.”
So yeah, the idea that “It’s a man’s world”….or “The world is set up to benefit men”…is nonsense. In fact, women end up with all the money. How so?
How women end up with all the money:
First, wealth is concentrated in the top 1%. The top 1% now have greater wealth, than the bottom 90%:
Next, men have more financial obligations than women. From the classic “Myth of Male Power” by Dr. Warren Farrell:
ITEM. Among the wealthiest 1.6 percent of the U.S. population (those with assets of $500,000 or more), women’s net worth is more than men’s. <net worth is the money you are left with, once you pay off your financial obligations> How can so many of the wealthiest people be women when women hold none of the top corporate jobs? In part, by selecting the men who do and outliving them. And in part by having greater spending power and lower spending power obligations. . . . SPENDING POWER A study of large shopping malls (including men’s shops and sporting goods stores) found that seven times as much floor space is devoted to women’s personal items as to men’s. Both sexes buy more for women. The key to wealth is not in what someone earns; it is in what is spent on ourselves, at our discretion—or in what is spent on us, at our hint. Overall, women control consumer spending by a wide margin in virtually every consumer category. With spending power comes other forms of power. Women’s control over spending gives them control over TV programs because TV is dependent on sponsors. When this is combined with the fact that women watch more TV in every time slot, shows can’t afford to bite the hand that feeds them. Women are to TV what bosses are to employees.
Dr. Warren Farrell. Kindle Edition….easily searchable on Kindle, if you want to confirm.
Go to a shopping mall some time, to see if Dr. Farrell is lying, about who benefits from money. Look around, open your eyes. Make note of things.
You will find most of the mall caters to women’s needs. (clothing stores, shoes, etc)
So, as per the Pareto Principle, 1% of Americans end up with most of the money. And of the people in the top 1%, most of that money is in the hands of women…..And the rest of the money that is earned in the economy, goes to men, who turn over 90% of their money to women, who then spend that money to drive our consumer economy. Just watch TV, asking yourself, “Who are these ads catering to?”….once you watch with that question in mind, it takes very, very little time to figure out, what is really going on. So the idea that men are economically dominant, is a fairy tale. Capitalism is about men competing to earn money, then giving that money to women. Capitalism is gyno-economics, in action. Despite the facts being what they are, the public continues to believe the feminist fraud about money.
But it’s more than just women ending up spending all the money earned in the workforce….in the private economy….all the while complaining they are powerless.
Belinda Gates. Excellent Sammich maker. Net worth $48 Billion.
Bill Gates. Built a business that changed the world. Net Worth $48 Billion.
Family Net Worth: $96 Billion.
But what about government?
Women end up with all the money, that is in private hands, that’s true, but they also end up with all the money, the government spends on it’s citizens….all the while complaining of being powerless.
How did women end up getting most of government benefits? We men gave them the vote. They voted in men, to give them money and cater to them.
Women are the majority of voters, so they vote for political parties that take money from men, give that money to women…especially single women. Where else do you think the gigantic welfare state comes from? Where does massive government debt come from? Women voters. Politics is now largely, how women organize, to take men’s money….and to steal money from the future, as someone will have to pay those bills, down the road…..and it won’t be women paying that money, it will be men, since men earn most of the money. So for women, it’s all about spending men’s money, they don’t have to pay back. That’s what women voting and taxes are all about: men pay them, women get the benefits. That’s how government works. That’s why most Democratic voters are women: Democrats have gone full tilt gynocentric and are willing to destroy America, run up all kinds of debt, to please women. Republicans will also destroy America, to please women, but will do it more slowly.
Giant government deficits will never be under control, so long as women can vote, because women realize, men pay the bills, so it’s in her interest, to run up his credit card. Hell yeah, why not? She won’t pay for it, he will. Women are not incentivized to be responsible with money. As Hillary Clinton said during the election, when asked if she was ready to run the economy: “I’ll let Bill run the economy.”
So “gyno-economics” is a realization that the whole economy is basically set up, to cater to women, to meet the needs and wishes of women. But: Why does the economy have this shape? At the root of it: Because men are judged by women, on the basis of what they can do for HER. Women get to decide who gets sex and attention, who does not. That’s part of the reason that men as a group, earn more money than women as a group: Men know women will judge them, by what they earn, so men compete harder for money than women do, as it gives them more access to better looking women. It’s not necessary for women to compete for money very hard, in order to get sex and attention from a man. That’s not how nature works. So capitalism is a gyno-centric economic system whereby men compete in a market, to acquire goods, resources and money, in order to please women….and basically get laid.
As Jordan Peterson wrote: “Women have a strong proclivity to marry up or across the economic dominance hierarchy. They prefer a partner of equal or greater status. This holds true, cross-culturally. The same does not hold, by the way, for men, who are perfectly willing to marry across or down. (as the Pew research indicates) Page 301, 12 Rules for Life, by Jordan Peterson.
So that’s basically why life, why the economy, is organized around pleasing women: It’s women who decide who gets sex and women judge men, based on income. And income and status are dominance hierarchy sex selection criteria for women, to sort out, which men they want to fuck. In all mammal species, the female decides who to mate with. This simple fact runs deep, shapes our world….right up to economics. So the economy developed naturally, as an economic mechanism which caters to women, as it’s primary function.
You want proof? It’s the same reason rape is bad: it takes away female control, over sex and reproduction. The degree to which we think rape is horrible…..and it IS….very, very horrible….is the degree to which female control over sex is essential to us as humans. That’s the biological basis of gynocentrism.
As part of the gyno-centric organization of the economy, women control the political system, since they are the majority of voters, so only men who cater to women, get elected. If you still think we live in a democracy, forget that notion. We live in a Gynocracy. Women decide elections, not men. Women elect men who cater to women’s needs. Once elected, those men do everything in their power, to please women, tilt the whole world in the favor of women. (divorce laws, government spending)
We see the influence of the female controlled economy, in politics in Europe and the United States now. Women decided to not have enough children to replace the population. So they voted in politicians who would bring in new men, to compete with the men in advanced countries. The monetary system drives pop. replacement. If not enough people are in the system buying houses, prices fall….banks don’t make money. So the economy only works if it keeps growing. Since women in advanced countries don’t bother having enough children to grow the economy, they vote in politicians who let in more people, to keep the economy growing. This displaces the men in advanced countries, as new men are brought in.
To understand all this, we need to get to the root of things: What drives the economic/monetary system? Seeking vagina…evolution: Men compete with each other for resources to impress women, control territory. 70% of the economy is consumer related. Women make 80% of consumer choices. So it’s worse than just population replacement by the elites: We live in a gynocentric economic system, where the endless desire for status among women, drive the system. Our monetary system arises out of gynocentric male/female relations and sexual competition. Capitalism is the latest rendition of evolution at work. It’s just highly organized versions of men climbing tree to get fruit for females, so they can have sex. Remember: in mammals it is the females who dispense and control sex, the males want more sex than they can get. This tension creates a sexual competition for resources that evolved into our current capitalist economic system, which is an evolved hypergamy resource collection system.
Could it change if it’s that basic?….part of nature?…maybe:
Automation will drop the cost of things to near zero, so when that comes, that may disrupt the gyno-centric sex exchange mechanism at the heart of capitalism and our monetary system. Till then, what is, is….Female status seeking….hyper-gamy….runs the whole thing, eventually destabilizing populations through population merge. In the modern world: women got the vote, so they vote in leaders, who let in new men to work, contribute to the system of catering to women. The new men compete with each other, to be able to provide the female with resources. This keeps the monetary and economic system endlessly growing. Since rich women don’t have babies, new men are constantly needed to prop up the gyno-centric economy, or it would collapse. In time, this dissolves nations, borders, customs and traditions…..with endless growth, endless resource extraction. It might end the ecology of the planet some day. We’ll see.
Male control is an illusion. It’s just something men tell themselves, to make themselves feel better about what they have to do.
My problem with the current situation: While female control over many things is important: It’s gotten completely out of hand. It’s unbalanced. The trouble is, this overwhelming female control and domination of our economic and political system, is starting to get out of hand, as this Joe Rogan interview talks about:
Men are usually unaware that this is how the world works, because no one has explained this over-overwhelmingly obvious fact, plus we as men evolved to compete for women and cater to them, so gynocentrism is natural to men.
This sort of thing comes out of nature itself: for all of evolution, females were physically weaker than males, they chose who to have sex with, they needed male protection and resources. The men who got their genes passed along, were the men who catered to women. That’s why human males tend to be gynocentric. Those are the genetic roots of the economy: We organize our economy, to take care of women and children. Like all mammal species, new life and protection of females is essential, for mammals to continue. The economy is just an extension of this biological reality.
And that would be fine, if feminists would just understand that males pretty much spend their whole lives working for the benefit of women, catering to them, looking after family and children. Most men spend their lives essentially being heroes who sacrifice for women. The proper attitude, should be gratitude. Rather than tell this obvious truth to women, which would help men and women get along better and love each other more, instead of that, at universities women are “educated” in a bizarre theory, that somehow men have spent all of evolution “oppressing women”….which is the opposite of reality. Feminism is evil, blind, ungrateful, ignorant nonsense. It’s basically hate speech, against men.
But it’s worse than this: Feminism has arisen and taken over the universities. And this nonsense is supported by the taxes of men. So think about that: Men are being taxed, so that women who hate men, can write books, about how evil men are. Those women are hired as teachers on campus, where they dedicate themselves to teach young women, how awful men are. The purpose of feminism is to create a fictional historic narrative, to convince American women that they are in fact “oppressed”, that men are supposedly evil and out to get women. Feminists shield women from the fact that American women are the most pampered, spoiled group of human beings, that have ever existed on this planet. After a few years of feminist indoctrination, young women emerge completely ignorant of real history, ignorant about technology, and terribly ungrateful and resentful, to men….the very people keeping them alive. Once a young woman is angry, bitter and confused, she is ready to be a feminist. If a woman is ready to make a career out of her anger and misandry, she might make a career out of it and get an advanced degree in Gender Studies.
Jordan Peterson is also curious, why we continue to fund universities that teach feminism.
“I do not understand why our society is providing public funding to institutions and educators whose stated, conscious and explicit aim is the demolition of the culture that supports them. Such people have a perfect right to their opinions. But they have no reasonable claim, to public funding….There are other serious problems lurking in the radical disciplines, apart from the falseness of their theories and methods…There isn’t a shred of hard evidence to support any of their central claims: That Western society is pathologically patriarchal; that the prime lesson of history is that men, rather than nature, were the primary source of the oppression of women.”
(from 12 Rules for Life, by Jordan Peterson, hardcover edition, page 313)
“Why do we teach our young people that our incredible culture is the result of male oppression? Blinded by this central assumption disciplines as diverse as education, social work, art history, gender studies, literature, sociology, and increasingly law treat men as oppressors and men’s activities as inherently destructive”. (page 305, same book)
However, despite the fairy tale feminist narrative dominating, reality is, what it is.
And now Ocasio wants to bring in something, close to communism. What is communism? Communism is just feminism, in a dress. The core of communist doctrine is the idea of taking from people who produce, giving to people who need. Sound familiar? Communism runs on feminine instincts, to take resources from men. Women survived evolution by manipulating men, taking resources from them….usually indirectly by social and psychological stealth…such as supporting religion and establishing social norms which benefit women, as well as controlling sexuality. Humans have a maternal dimension of compassion and openness…and this is evident in women, more than men. Those are the human instincts that communism appeals to. It’s very evident in communism, in theory anyways, more than capitalism. Trouble is, communism doesn’t work….just like feminism doesn’t work, as it only considers the female point of view. Compassion by itself, doesn’t work, unless it has a good economic theory behind it, that’s in alignment with reality. When female instincts take over the world, things get out of hand.
Communism murdered 100 Million in the 20th Century, despite being grounded in “compassion”…..and if that doesn’t frighten you, nothing will. The capitalist system has many faults, but since it is built around “male” centered principles like “competition”….it tends to work much better at producing goods and services and innovating. Communism is based on essentially female dominated human impulses for making sure everyone has enough, for “compassion”. The big surprise for economists is that designing an economic system around fairness actually is a horrible idea, and doesn’t work. Socialism and communism are both failures because female impulses are for manipulation. Male impulses are more rationally based, competitive. So capitalism is essentially male. This makes sense because in evolution men hunted, created and provided resources. So an economic system based on these male impulses is more likely to work. Women just took care of people in evolution. Being smaller and physically weaker, but cunning, women were about manipulation and taking care of people…..and not about the burden of leadership and providing protection and resources for all. So no surprise, building an economic system around female impulses….communism…it failed miserably, because it arose out of female evolutionary impulses that were not suited to real leadership, not suited to protecting, for creating a system to provide and create things for people. These were things males did in evolution….women far less so. So no wonder capitalism is so much better than socialism and communism. The logic of evolution suggests, that it must be so. Men evolved to take care of women. But women evolved to take care of children, not men. That’s the difference. Men are gyno-centric, but women are not evolved to take care of men.
Gyno-centrist human tendencies in men are fine, they are part of being a human being, it’s part of nature, we men evolved to care for women, but when we go full tilt gynocentric, with no brake pedal, we are near the end of our culture. When men both endlessly cater to women, while women berate men and allow women to take over all the levers of power, as is happening now, when we gave women the vote, we are not in a good place. Giving women the vote doomed our culture, in my opinion. With the power of the vote, women now control the economy. Bad move, boys.
Repeal the 19th, or we are done. Stick a fork in America. We are done like dinner.
Gynocentrism? It’s getting so out of hand. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is like the psychotic ex-wife in court, looking for your wallet. She’s a “progressive”, who believes in open borders. Which means, there should be no borders, between her fingers, and your wallet.
Turd Flinging Monkey gives a very good look at the politics of catering and pandering to women, which has gotten out of hand and is destroying America.