I’ve always liked England.
Despite their status now, and though I do think colonialism was ultimately a mistake, and despite Churchill having lived, it’s impossible not to respect the legacy of Great Britain and the English or Anglo-Saxons. They just did so much in the way of exploration, culture, trade, etc. that it is a great testament to the ability of Germanic people and they essentially made us synonymous with “white people”. When most people around the world think of white people, I doubt it’s slavs or celts who first come to mind, it’s probably — for better or worse — the English, and Germanic people by extension, of whom they think.
A little more than 100 years ago, that tiny, rainy island was an unbelievable superpower and dominant cultural force.
Today, misgendering is a crime and rabid negros and inexplicably guilt-ridden white people are trying to destroy its proud history in its motherland.
However, there is hope, as some men did stand up for these monuments. It is certainly good to see white men standing up and fighting back for once.
That has not, however, stopped the “optics cucks” from complaining.
So…what, then? These guys shouldn’t have defended England because they weren’t all ripped Adonises? Is that it? I’m getting the sense that’s it. Do you actually think it would have mattered? This is a bit like what I talked about in my article from a while back “The Right-Wing Fitness Farce”, where are all the 180 IQ, ripped, viking warriors at? How come I never see them actually fighting back, but just arguing on the internet and “posting physique”?
The truth is, it wouldn’t matter how sober these guys were, how good-looking, or ripped, or whatever. The media will still demonize them, and all the Antifa and BLM will still be against them until the bitter end just the same. Actually, what does it say when these supposedly “bad optics” guys have the balls to actually defend England, and all the “glorious” men don’t?
I have never really agreed with the “optics” argument because it really just doesn’t matter in influencing people’s thoughts that much and our enemies are always going to hate us no matter what you say, think or do.
The best optics stance to take here would be kneeling and groveling before the blacks, would it not? Showing “solidarity” and all that? Has that stopped these protests and riots? Has that appeased the POCs? No, and it never will. So sacrificing intensity of your message to try and “appease” people is a losing strategy that ultimately dilutes your message. Like, sure — being a raging lunatic and an outright slob would obviously hurt the PR to the people we’re trying to reach — and there’s an argument to be made that we’ve already reached those who can be and will matter — but that kind of thing is a far cry from what we’re seeing here.
Is that “good optics” or at least better than England? No, and I think more are coming around to the idea that it isn’t. It is far more demoralizing to see your history destroyed without a fight, than it is to see ordinary men come out and defend it.
Especially at this point in the battle, arguing for “optics” is essentially just saying “do nothing and hope they’ll hate us less”. We have to accept now that this is just a losing strategy.
Still, I just can’t help the schadenfreude…