I will come back to this subject as it rolls on in meatspace, of course, but the point of this blog entry will be just initial thoughts on the “return of some, kinda sorta select freedoms in Germany™”
“The new regulation will put vaccinated people and those who have recovered from Covid-19 (if the infection occurred no more than six months ago) on an equal footing with those who’ve tested negatively for the virus. So these groups will not need to show a negative test to visit the hairdresser, museum or the zoo, for example, but will instead be asked to present a full vaccination certificate”
A lot of places are just not going to give a shit, probably.
When the law comes into force, it also means people with immunity will be able to meet in unlimited numbers – so they won’t face the tougher contact restrictions. They also won’t have to adhere to curfews.
But here’s where it gets most interesting to me:
“After contact with someone infected with coronavirus, vaccinated people and those who have recovered will no longer have to go into quarantine. They also won’t have to self-isolate after travel unless they are coming from a country that has been designated a high-risk area. Some German states have already started easing some rules for people with immunity.
About 31.5 percent of the population had received at least one jab up to May 6th, and 8.8 percent had been fully inoculated – meaning just under 10 percent of people are currently eligible for increased freedoms, not including those who have recovered from the virus.”
Those are absolutely not vaccination numbers they wanted. 8.8% not getting the “jab” in full and just 30 percent (and I’m not sure I even believe the numbers are this high) is simply not enough to sustain a vaccine passport scheme in any long-term scenario.
It’s too early to tell, and maybe I’m just having early-bird optimism or something (people here usually say I’m too much of a downer so take what you can get) but to me, the fact that “recovered” people will be on “equal footing” to vaxholes suggests that they think they’re losing and are looking for a way to wind this hoax down and memory hole it. Admitting that the human immune system works is not an advantage for them.
I just can’t exactly figure out why else they would have this stipulation for the ultra-deadly disease that we apparently need economic destruction and vaccine passports for. I guess you could argue that on some level it is conceding that the government was justified in their “measures’ and that the virus was real, but there is just no way that allowing unvaxxed people with “antibodies” to go around in groups and such after they contracted the “disease” is good for the narrative. Like, at all.
Because what is inevitable, is all the unvaxxed “recovered” people are all going to be fine. They’re not going to wind up hospitalized, deathly-sick, or whatever else and then pretty quickly people are going to say “Why bother getting vaxxed at all?” and that will carry over into future “pandemics” as well.
Something everyone seems to have forgotten is that at the start of this bullshit, media around the world were talking about how within “a matter of weeks” antibody tests kits for home use would be available in your supermarket. This was quickly totally abandoned, all discussion of it ceased, and most places to my knowledge don’t have these things.
I have actually had trve believers suggest that all of us who don’t believe in this hoax get put into a stadium with even ONE sick person, but then walk it back when we anti-vaxxers and doubters heartily agreed to that challenge. Every anti-vaxxer would gladly say “I’ll just catch the virus and get immunity to it that way”.
That’s why I just don’t see what advantage they gain by allowing the “recovered” to participate as well. Without the two-tier society and vaccine passports for the majority, I just don’t see how they can keep this scheme going. I guess you could also say that maybe it means the spike-protein shedding is real, but again — if it is real, why not just open everything back up for everyone, no masks nothing, right now? That would be the most-effective way at distributing the spike protein.
You could also argue that it is a way of allowing more tracking to happen even without the vaccine, but it would not really be any more tracking than showing an ID or cellphone towers at that point and would eventually be so tedious and get to a point where “surely everyone is exposed and recovered by now”? I think that would be the logical endpoint.
They also say:
“However, general safety rules such as mandatory masks and keeping a distance will still apply to people with immunity.”
Why, though? This just straight doesn’t make any sense. Even politicians are commenting on it:
The FDP, however, said the law doesn’t go far enough. The party welcomes the return of freedom, said Christine Aschenberg-Dugnus, health policy spokesperson of the FDP. “But rights and freedoms only exist as a whole,” she said.
She said it was incomprehensible that essential restrictions on freedom should continue to apply to vaccinated people in hotels, leisure facilities or cultural venues, for example. These facilities have largely been closed since November.
“There is no apparent reason why vaccinated people and people who’ve recovered cannot play team sports together, for example, or why a restaurateur cannot open his indoor premises to vaccinated people,” said Aschenberg-Dugnus.
Yeah well, nothing about this hoax has ever been logically consistent.
The big question here is: If I have permission to go outside if I’ve recovered, why don’t I have permission to just go catch the virus if I’ve never had it? We can assume I’ll have caught it by being outside or by breaking the rules right? It will be very hard to maintain the narrative with this question looming, I think.
I was told by some Americans, who I am now seriously starting to wonder if they weren’t controlled-op shills, that vaccine passports would not work in America because they don’t have this socialized medicine or whatever, but as far as I am aware, these stipulations of “recovered” people being given any amount of the freedoms back does not exist and vaccination rate is still way higher in the USA than Germany. In Canada, which is one of the most-retarded police states in the world right now by my knowledge, they are just using more and more hard power tactics as the vaccination rate stagnates.
That, by the way, is probably the only two ways they can go. If they aren’t getting the numbers, they can pull this “you’re good to go-ish if you’re recovered™” thing as a way of winding it down, or they can go full police-state if they want to see it through and feel they won’t meet much resistance.
So it looks like that assessment of “all will be well in NA” was wrong. The EU is also going to allow the unvaxxed to travel here provided they come from an “epidemiologically good” country. I didn’t expect even that much to be allowed, to be honest.
I don’t know. Like I said, all of this is just my initial thoughts. In the coming days, weeks and months as it is rolls on we’ll know more for sure obviously. Maybe I’m horribly wrong and everything is just about to get even worse. As I edit this post and add more thoughts before publishing, the only thing I can come up with as for why they may be taking this approach is that they plan to repurpose the tests to administer the affects of the vaccine?
But my initial reaction, due to the government conceding that it is possible to give unvaxxed people freedom back and that the human immune system works, could be a sign that we are winning in Europe. They may be deciding that the juice is no longer worth the squeeze.
Like I have always said: No matter what, don’t get the vaccine.