![Carbon 60 is a Longevity Gamechanger [Infographic] 1](https://linkyou.blog/wp-content/uploads/xcarbon-60-is-a-longevity-gamechanger-infographic-168x117.png.pagespeed.ic.JSA-QnHCO5.jpg "Carbon 60 is a Longevity Gamechanger [Infographic]")
“Free Speech” Isn’t An Inherent Virtue Save for later Reblog
Recently, I saw on Gab that Facebook decided to ban over 1000 AntiFa and BLM riot groups.
One poster condemned all those in the comments who voiced their support for Facebook’s banning of these groups, saying something to the effect of “Free speech means free speech! You’re no better than the leftists!”
Of course, this is all Kosher sandwich stuff and it’s not like Facebook is actually against BLM or anything, but that’s really beside the point.
The point is that a consistent problem we have had as a race is the issue of moral grandstanding (virtue signaling) and a failure to actually SOLVE problems, and that results in a failure to understand the basic concept of “If Side A is willing to use force or some other effective strategy to get what it wants, and Side B is unwilling to meet or exceed that, Side A will win.”
Being “the bigger person” means giving yourself a handicap, letting your opponent have the advantage and walk all over you. I always though this old comic strip illustrated that pretty well. You have to fight to keep what’s yours. Winning some sort of moral victory only matters to yourself.
“Free speech” is probably the biggest thing people on our side tend to argue as this great virtue, but the truth is, they only champion it because we are the ones who are primarily censored.
What they fail to consider is that it was through “Free speech” and expression that Jews were able to subvert and brainwash our societies in the first place. By repeating their narratives over and over again through movies, TV, news, schools, etc. they are able to “inject” new social norms by making them appear already accepted by most of society.
“Free speech” and “free expression”, which is downstream, made that possible because if the government would have said “Hey, this is anti-white, pro-communist propaganda, we’re not letting this hit theaters or the screen” then they would not have been able to indoctrinate the masses into the cult of “human equality”.
Ask yourself this: Do you think that school teachers should be allowed to preach Marxist ideology to kids? Do you think that Netflix should be allowed to produce and release French films about 11-year-old “Twerking crews”? Do you think these people should be punished for this in some way?
If you answered yes to that last one, then you are not as in favor of free speech as you think.
The National Socialists burned pornography, degenerate art and subversive communist texts. Were they wrong to do that? After all, it WAS an assault on “free speech and expression”.
Should we allow guys who get up on a stage and shout into a megaphone and fire bananas out of their ass to be called “art”? Should we allow smearing of menstrual blood to be put up in art galleries next to works by Da Vinci?
That would be suppressing “free speech/expression” to do so.
Well, not doing so is exactly why today menstrual “paintings’ are considered “art” and great Donatello sculptures are considered outdated, unoriginal works of white supremacy. Of course, you don’t want to be so opposed to new ways of thinking that you stifle genuine creativity and innovation, but you can’t just let legitimate subversives go around spewing whatever they want either.
A friend of mine often says “If we win, I WANT these people to have free speech so that people can see how dumb and insane their ideas are!”
The trouble with that is that we had exactly that before and that’s how we got to where we are. We ALLOWED our enemies to have free speech and guess what? They successfully duped the normies into welcoming their own genocide as a result. It doesn’t matter how stupid, insane or provably false their ideas are, if they can normalize it via mass media and school brainwashing, they will successfully undermine your country and its leadership.
The argument of “if our enemies have free speech, then everyone will know how retarded their ideas are and we’ll be safe from them” is exactly the same as (and suffers from the same flawed premise) of democracy, and that is the idea that people are inherently rational and can recognize propaganda meant to harm them. We know this is a false premise.
If we were to say, have the third Reich back, but we decided that “we’re about free speech!” Then we will inevitably lose the Reich. Because even if we’ve gotten rid of the Jews and non-whites, there will still be some leftover degenerates who will think our nation or its standards shouldn’t exist. Then, one day, a few of those people find their way into your news stations and movie industry and next thing you know, a smash hit movie about forbidden love between citizens of two different kingdoms comes out and spawns a few sequels. Give it a few years or decades and the “diversity is our greatest strength” narrative will be everywhere in your Reich. Brainwashing even your army.
Because you have to remember lies and subversive propaganda are free speech too and as is now far beyond proven — an entire civilization can be molded around lies.
Like I said, what a lot of people in our movement don’t understand is that if you don’t solve the problem forever, then all the sacrifices made were for absolutely nothing.
So, if we win the culture war and the resulting society throws pro-marxist teachers in jail (I’d be down with abolishing public schools in general) fines people for flying a USSR flag, or fires a journalist for writing some fake news meant to be subversive propaganda — that’s fine by me.
Our enemies use this tactic against us because they know that we are the subversives in their globo-homo, anti-white system. Censoring us is a perfectly reasonable war strategy for them to use against us; it’s baffling that anyone expects they wouldn’t. They do NOT want our ideas to be normalized. If we’re not willing to use their tactics or worse against them, then we will lose.
I’m afraid that what your school teachers told you about “not stooping to their level” was simply a lie meant to handicap you and let your enemy keep the upper hand. All you wind up doing is moral grandstanding, and you’re the only person to whom this matters.
Good advice, Thumper!
We are supposed to be nationalists. Our only real concern is that our people have our own homes and future to ourselves. Nothing else takes precedence over that. Our grandchildren are not going to thank us for “being the bigger person” and not censoring our enemies when they’re hated and hunted minorities in their own homes.
We are not pro-police, we’re not capitalist evangelicals, we’re not about incels and their woman bashing, we’re not about Christianity and we’re not free speech/expression activists or fighting for Jewish conceptions of “freedom” at all: We are about our survival as a race — we are not “principled” losers, we are about winning our right to exist, whatever it takes.
One comment on '“Free Speech” Isn’t An Inherent Virtue'
I am not affected by their propaganda bs, and you, certainly, neither. So, would you realy say the problem is free speech?
As I see it, the problem is sheer stupidity. There are way too many people incapable of rational thought. So no matter what you do, there will always be a problem.
Lets say we limit "free speech", but what will happen then? Who tells you, that what you think is the correct thing? The people who limit free speech have their own agenda and nowhere is said that it is the best one. To the people with power, any idea is (was and always will be) a threat to the power. So that is why we have free speech, and yes that includes to know that some (if not most) ideas are very very stupid.
Until you find a cure for stupidity, there is no solution to that problem. Free speech is "bad" and limited speech too.