Evolution and Voting Save for later Reblog
How to change the current toxic relationship between men and women? First, don’t call Dr. Phil. He just caters to women. Don’t even call Dr. Peterson, who has a much bigger brain. Instead, take away the right of women, to vote. That would help men and women get along much, much better, than even stellar counseling.
Understanding women and men: Women are wired in nature, for emotion, more than reason. That’s because human females, like any mammal, cared for their very young, throughout evolution. So it makes sense for nature to wire women, more emotionally than men. That’s also why men should dominate politics and how society should be run and set up.
Men are wired to protect, especially to protect women, take care of women, that’s how we evolved. Women did not evolve to protect and care for men. That’s why Matriarchies don’t work. Only Patriarchies work…and they are based on Reason…a trait found more in men, than women.
Reason is an evolutionary adaptation, more common in males than females…..that’s why democracy and votes for women are a bad idea: women didn’t evolve to lead, they evolved to have babies and keep the social life of the tribe going. Problem is: Women vote more than men, live longer than men, out number men…so our political system reflects this, and our political system is now geared towards emotion, now that women vote. Fatal error…..
That’s why we have open borders. That’s why we have feminism…and that’s why we have this insanity between the genders. We were not built for this. I believe in God, and God works through evolution, and we are not listening to how God arranged nature. We are going against the narrative laid out pretty clearly in the Bible…it is Patriarchal, to the core.
That’s why Europe will die from mass migration. That’s why it is a fatal cultural mistake, letting women vote. Women didn’t evolve to lead men. Women didn’t evolve to lead society. When they got the vote, that gave women, effectively power over men. That’s damn wrong. It’s unnatural. It goes against evolution. It goes against God’s plan for the genders.
It won’t work, because women are crazy and emotional. We fix that, we take the vote away from women, or they will destroy our way of life…with 3rd Wave pink haired feminist nut-jobs leading the charge. A better plan: No vote for women, no open borders, women stay home and have babies when they are young, like they evolved to, and are looked after and protected by men. Careers? Education? After 30…..maybe, we’ll see.
Benevolent Patriarchy, is what we need. It works.
Women get the vote?…. we get open borders and feminism, the birth rate drops like a rock, and we are ruined……
We have no choice, unless we wish to die off. Women and emotion now control our politics and economics. That’s why it is failing. It’s men’s fault. We were stupid enough to let women vote. We must take the vote away from women, or we modern people will die off. The vote for women was a mistake……UUUUUGE…..UUUUUUUGE…mistake: Don’t blame women. It’s men’s fault, we were stupid enough to give them the vote, we must now take it away, to save us all.
We already tried this feminism thing. For the past 45 years feminism has been going furiously, taking over our lives. So what happened? It has failed. We gave women sexual freedom. We gave women access to university. We gave women jobs. We gave women control over their sexual reproduction, with abortion and birth control. So how is our social experiment going?….and the birth rate across Europe plunged, to far below replacement level. Needing workers, the government opened up immigration, to replace all the workers that were not born, due to women concentrating more on careers, less on motherhood. But did this new arrangement make women happier? Let’s look at the data, from 2009:
Executive Summary of the Paradox of Declining Female Happiness:
“By many objective measures the lives of women in the United States have improved over the past 35 years, <the study was done about ten years ago, so it’s more like 45 years now> yet we show that measures of subjective well-being indicate that women’s happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to men. The paradox of women’s declining relative well-being is found across various datasets, measures of subjective well-being, and is pervasive across demographic groups and industrialized countries. Relative declines in female happiness have eroded a gender gap in happiness in which women in the 1970s typically reported higher subjective well-being than did men. These declines have continued and a new gender gap is emerging — one with higher subjective well-being for men.”
There you have it. Feminism has failed as a social experiment. Giving women the vote has failed. The main job of females in any mammal population is ensuring the next generation survives and is born. Give women the vote, social empowerment, what happens? The European population is going extinct, social unrest is our future. And it’s not like our current social arrangements make women happy. Quite the opposite: Women are miserable….and women report themselves to be more and more miserable, year after year, for decades. And women can’t figure out why?…. I can….. The reason women are miserable, is that feminism failed, because it’s out of alignment, with evolution:
Women evolved to have children, when women are between ages 15 and 30. That’s biologically normal, in evolution. Modern life and feminism tells women to go to school, compete for jobs with men, instead. This is completely out of whack with evolution. This is crazy. Women can’t be in two places at one time. Feminists say women should have exclusive control over reproduction. Men agreed. The thing is, with full control comes responsibility for the consequences of that exclusive power. So how is it working out for us, giving women exclusive power over reproduction? Other than Europeans are going extinct and women are miserable, it’s working out just fine. This feminist strategy is making women miserable, for a variety of reasons, as well as destroying the most advanced culture in the world. We need a new social model.
Maybe women should be given the option of less time in the workplace, less time in school, more of them full time Moms. A more sensible approach: Women should be mostly having children, till they are old and 30, then they can work in a career, all they want. Modern women have a life expectancy of 85. But they only have about 15 years to have children. Women should be having their kids when they are very young, then the kids are in school by age 35, a woman is free to work. She will like till her 80s, so she has lots of time to work….but little time to have a family. A little biological common sense might save us from feminism. That’s how a biologically normal society function…..and survives. Our current feminist plan is leading us to genetic annihilation. Self induced, by the way.
Jordan Peterson is calling for people to accept responsibility. I agree. The best way for a young man to accept responsibility, is to sacrifice for his wife and children. But the only way that will happen, is if we restore full male authority. The best way for a young woman to accept responsibility, is to sacrifice for her children. But general social equality for men and women? No thanks. We need more gender-specific roles, with voting rights removed, from women. When both genders do this, accept responsibility, within their roles, then life has meaning. It’s the deepest thing we have, wired right into us. If we ignore this biological responsibility, here’s what happens:
We change, we follow the path of nature, or we die off….
Leave a reply
One comment on 'Evolution and Voting'