Communism doesn’t work because it goes against evolution.
Men evolved to compete with each other, for social status. That pattern can be seen in every race, every ethnicity of men….for all time. Go back far enough, the best hunter often got better looking women, more respect in the community….leading to more mating opportunities, since women evolved to mate with men with more resources. Women evolved to prefer to mate with men of higher status…who would have more resources. Among humans, like in all groups of mammals, Dominance Hierarchies are real, are essential and a natural part of our social organization. Property is how humans socially signal their status. It’s an evolutionary mating signal.
Communism tries to destroy all these natural features of humans. By destroying private property, communism works against basic evolutionary signals in both men and women.
Capitalism is much more natural, more sensible. It embraces hierarchies as part of it’s economic and social structure, allows men to compete for status, which allows women to chose the best men.
Feminism and communism are twins of sorts. Both attack the natural family and especially male authority…..and status…. within that family. Here’s the back story on what got feminism and communism really going: When men invented science and capitalism, when men invented the modern world…..and pretty much everything you see around you…..from your computer, TV, the city around you, cars, buses, every machine you ever saw….then the entire modern economy was created. This happened quite recently….just over a hundred years ago. Quite recent by historical standards. This created more human wealth than any other period of human history or evolution. This process really kicked in, during the late 1800s, when most of the scientific achievements that make the modern world possible, were created….as Jordan Peterson has pointed out. This most astonishing creation event, it did not pass the notice of ambitious women….stuck as they were in their old gender roles of being Mothers. Feminists saw the spoils of men’s labor, with wide eyes of desire and ambition. Feminists wanted more wealth, more social status for women….without the hassle of marriage and children. They pushed to allow women to start to compete with men, for economic status and resources….based on notions of “fairness” and “equality”.
Those both sound like good ideas at first glance, notions of “fairness” and “equality” for both sexes, but the devil is in the details. Fast forward to just over a hundred years, from that Victorian era, we already see that women economically competing with men can quickly go very, very wrong….quickly. It is going very wrong, right in front of our eyes….and people are scrambling to understand why that is. This female competition with men, is of course, is ruining capitalism, ruining advanced technological nations. See my post on Turd’s Law, link below. See Elon Musk’s video….”No More Kids” on youtube, to confirm this.
The root cause of our trouble: When women economically compete with men, then since women only “mate up”…..evolved hyper-gamy….then every woman increases the status required of men, for a man to sexually interest her. This lowers the birth rate, below replacement level, as some women start to economically compete with men when they are young, rather than being Mothers. Smart women tend to breed less, in these circumstances. This makes the population dumber, over time. It also destroys the population that created the wealth in the first place, since it is women who create all new life….and they no longer have enough children….the population collapses in time. And since all economies depend on new humans coming along, being born, this drastic lowering of the birth rate means a quick demographic end for a country. That’s why Europe is disintegrating, right before our eyes: When women have too few children, the country ends quickly, or is replaced by another culture, where women don’t compete with men, economically.
When communism comes in, it destroys all economic and social hierarchies, it destroys all human incentive….particularly male incentive. Society breaks down. Communism assumes that if social hierarchies and private property are destroyed or leveled out, that everything will suddenly be “fair”….and better for all. This is a very, very naive assumption.The reason this is a wrong and naive assumption, is that all wealth is created by hard work, mostly by men competing with each other, for social position and status….almost all wealth is created out of male sexual competition, with other males….competing for power and status and resource, to impress females. And within that wealth creation reality, which is mostly male….most of that wealth is created by the best men, the top producers. They create almost everything. That’s the Pareto Principle in Economics. So when communism comes along, it by definition destroys private property, it destroys marriage, it destroys hierarchies, then it destroy every reason males have, to work hard, to produce, to lead, to innovate. It also destroys the contribution of the top men, killing economic innovation and growth. Communism destroys the very mechanism by which most wealth is created, then communism expects that wealth to continue to be there, for the benefit of women. That’s an insane way to look at reality. It’s also a lie. The truth is: Men work hard, to be able to say, “this is my property”…”this is my wife”….”this is my status”….”these are my children”….take away all these thing from a man, he has no reason to work. His biological incentive to work has been destroyed. High taxation, feminism and communism all have this effect on men. Communism attempts to destroy every reason for a man to work…..then it expects men to work, with no incentive. That’s really designing an economic systems that is at odds with evolution. Quite insane. There is no end to the depth of communistic idiocy and evolutionary ignorance….and that of it’s ideological twin of feminism.
Economics must be in alignment with evolution, or it won’t work….long term. To understand and design optimal social order, peel apart the evolutionary roles of men and women. Women have a different role in evolution, than men. Men compete for women. Children come naturally to women. About 80% of modern human women in evolution have left offspring. Only 40% of human men in evolution have left offspring. Nature itself, evolution itself, has produced a natural biological competition mechanism, among men….who must acquire status and resources, to be successful in evolution. Women have no need for such a competition, as they have vaginas. Then don’t really need to economically compete as much as men do, to be biologically successful. Men cater to women with resources, to win their sexual favors…..that’s why economical equality between the genders is silly: nature does not set up men and women to be biologically equal. That’s why economic systems based on gender equality, don’t work: because nature itself is unequal…..with very different roles for men and women. Nature is mutually complimentary, between men and women. The female role is just as important as the male role…..but it’s not equal in the sense of being the same. Far from it…..That’s a deep evolutionary thing, we can’t change. That’s why fairy tales like communism….and feminism, don’t work.
We always need to get back to basic biology, to understand these things. Men don’t have the same biological options and incentives, as women. Women don’t compete for men as much as men compete for women. That’s why Prostitution is the World’s Oldest Profession: Men want more sex, than women are willing to give. Women don’t need to pay money to men, in order to get sex from men. We men will give it to them, for practically nothing. Women don’t need to acquire resources, so men will sleep with them. The deep reason for all this? Men don’t get pregnant. Women do…… Men don’t judge women, whether they should sleep with a woman, based on her social and economic status. Women judge men all the time, on his social and economic standing. Women decide to sleep with him….or not….based on economic status. Men don’t do that, towards women.
That’s why men compete so hard. That explains the wage gap: men produce more wealth than women…in order to impress women, then give women their wealth, to get her sexual favor. That’s why men do almost all the useful things in the world…..natural sexual competition has hard-wired men, to do so. The genius of capitalism is to build into it’s economic system, an incentive for men to work hard, to achieve. The stupidity of communism and feminism is that it does not build into it’s system, reasons for men to work hard and compete. That’s a real problem because: Men, as opposed to women, pretty much keep everything going, economically and in every other way…in every race, every culture, every type of economic system. Just like men pay most of the taxes. Take that away, the system eventually ends itself….
Since men produce or do things, do most of everything needed to keep society stable, then when communism destroys male incentive by destroying private property, when communism destroys social ranking by flattening hierarchies, when communism or feminism flattens the economy to make it “fair” for women…… when all that happens: Then eventually communism or feminism destroys the entire economy, the entire social fabric that keeps everything stable….because men have no reason to keep doing, what they do….Then the world breaks down.
That is the same reason, looking back at human evolution, 99.999% of all human societies have been Patriarchies, not Matriarchies. Communism and feminism are Matriarchies….that’s why they don’t work. They never survive evolution. Why not? Communism and feminism, they only take an entirely female point of view in social organization. Communism and feminism, they don’t care or understand, what the male role is, what the male contribution is, or how or why it works. Communism and feminism is based on biological ignorance of men and women….who they are, biologically in nature….what makes the two genders tick, as animals.
Feminism and communism make perfect sense, in a world where there are only women….and wealth can magically appear out of thin air. In a magical world where the woman’s point of view is the only point of view, then feminism and communism makes perfect sense. Both feminism and communism arise out of female impulses for “fairness” and “kindness” and “social justice”. They both arise out of natural female biology, in evolution. Capitalism arises out of male competition, natural social hierarchies and the evolved sexual dynamics of men competing, acquiring resources, and women picking the best man they can get in the sexual negotiation. Both feminism and communism, they both don’t take into account male nature or the male role in evolution, or the interplay of male and female biological roles in nature and mating, or what makes men tick, what makes women tick, what makes the genders tick together.
Even in a world where there are only women, even then of course, communism won’t work….for who will produce everything, to keep the economy going? Women won’t keep the world going, if men don’t. Want proof? Have men go on strike in a city, for one year. Let the women run and do everything….the men used to do. See if it works. See how long your society lasts, before complete collapse. The truth is: Men do practically all the vital things for economic stability. Women don’t. As Camille Paglia put it: “If it were up to women, we’d still be living in grass huts.”……That’s why social stability in communism doesn’t work….it relies on women doing as many useful things, as men do. That never happens. Not a knock on women, they simply didn’t evolve for it. Just like men didn’t evolve to get pregnant.
Communism is a disaster because it sets up a basically female-oriented society where men are discouraged from working and competing. This brings out a practical problem: How do you keep such a society going, where men don’t want to work? Where men don’t want to produce? Where men are lazy, don’t want to compete? There was an old Soviet Joke that went like this: “Men in the Soviet Union used to say….the government pretends to pay us….we pretend to work”……
Where men have no reason to get up in the morning….how do you keep society going? Brute force is the only way. That’s why all communist societies eventually turn to terror and brute force. That’s why feminism and Matriarchy running everything, it ends in tyrannical brutality. When men are dis-incentivized from voluntarily doing what is necessary for a civilized country, they must be forced to do so….by brutality and control. When feminism or communism wins, so will brutality in the end, for voluntary male incentive for useful behavior is quickly stripped away by both communism or feminism. This was clearly in evidence in every country where communism ruled.
The cousin of communism is alive and well on American campuses. The political left in the United States, opposed as they are to free speech, is already showing plenty of signs of their innate brutality coming out. You can’t be a communist, without being a brute at some point. The left, they are just aching to end free speech and tell men what to do…..force them to do it, force them to think a certain way. The organizing force of communism is fear. To keep men so fearful, so men continue to work, so women and children can live…….But what if men don’t obey? Then the terror starts. Communism always starts with flowery feminine language about the highest and kindest human ideas like “equality” and “fairness”….and it always ends in brutality and oppression. It does so because the internal dynamics of communism and feminism are contrary to evolution. They simply can’t work very long, based on their errant biological assumptions about men and women.
Communism and feminism both assume that, if we listen to emotion enough, we can understand how the world actually works. Then we can make it a better place. That’s a naive dream. We do need to understand our emotions as humans. That’s helpful. But not just the female point of view….also the male point of view. We are a gynocentric species. Men evolved to care for and protect women. That’s a wonderful thing, but that same impulse to protect women can lead us astray, if we ignore logic, reason, evidence and science. Concentrating too much on the feminine can lead to disasters….like communism….with it’s 100 Million corpses…..far surpassing Hitler. We need a balance of both…..logic and emotion. All economic and ideological systems must also meet and pass systems of both logic and tests of science as well as emotion. And if they fail these tests, we must toss them out…..or modify them. By my best guess: Feminism is a failure in many ways. Communism has proven itself a complete failure.