Censoring Men Save for later Reblogpost

TimBucks
@TimBucks

Send Private MessageSubscribe50

Why do women censor men? It’s evolution. Humans evolved in small tribes. It’s sexual dimorphism at work: Women are physically smaller, weaker than men, so they evolved social manipulation and control abilities because they could not physically intimidate men. The female strategy: They get Alpha Men on their side as allies, women manipulate these men, to get them to use their influence to control the other men. What’s in it for the men who are manipulated by women, to control other men? Social status that comes from female approval. Perhaps real, perhaps imaginary sexual approval. That’s what’s in it for the engineers and men who run Google, which is trying to censor the internet. Goofy little nerds get to be popular with women for a short time. Google is technologically Alpha in our current economy, that’s the good news, for them. The bad news for Google: this won’t last. They will lose. 

In the long run the solution to this political contest will be technical: platforms like Bitchute, where I’m signed up. You make sure you are on Bitchute. Do your part to fight censorship. Don’t be manipulated. Be free. 

Men are at an advantage when they can express themselves freely. They are at a power disadvantage, when they are controlled. The question is: will the internet be a male-friendly space? Or a space controlled by women? Will Google win? Will they change their corporate name to Gulag? Internet freedom is to the advantage of the male, but not to the female. In a controlled environment, women gain the upper hand. Want proof? Here it is: marriage. Ask a marriage man, what the dog pound, the leash, feels like. The opposite is true, in places where men are free. Freedom is about men having advantage. Control is about women having advantage. Women are at a distinct social disadvantage on a free and open platform, like Bitchute, if there is no social monitoring. On You-Tube and Google, with all the censoring, the power of women and SJWs and feminists….is rising. Silicon Valley is the home of radical left wing ideology. They embrace the whole SJW feminist narrative, completely out of step with most of the country. Now they want that whack-job agenda to be dominant one, over all America. How will this be imposed? Messing with algorithms at Google, to control what information you see, suppressing dissenting voices. Google wants to hack your brain. They are in bed with the Matriarchy Party, the DemonRats.  It’s part of a larger radical Democratic Party Plan: But first things first. Google wants to control politics, first, as Tucker explains below. Then the Feminazis can win. First Google wants to hack the American election:

The root reason men have more power where there is freedom, has to do with the biology of male-female interaction. In the internet, when it’s not regulated, we get pure unfiltered opinion…like this one. In life, because of biology, women have the power that nature gave them, in social situations. That disappears on the internet, unless you are being monitored. That female power is lost in the virtual world: A women can post a comment in the comment section, but no one can see her breasts, no one hears her seductive voice. There is no subtle sexual dance, no social exchange of any meaningful kind, no gender bias in the comment section of you-tube. Women are treated just like men. No wonder women stay away from you-tube: they are treated equally in the comment section. This means female sexual tools of power, are lost in the comment section….they mean nothing.

Maybe that’s why, as Jordan Peterson pointed out, 80% of the people on you-tube, are men. We are at a crossroads, though. That’s what the fight for internet freedom is about. It has been till now, a space more friendly to men. In the comment section of you-tube, your comments don’t really have a gender. They are evaluated, based on what you wrote, not based on, do you have a dick or vagina? This neuters the sexual power of women, online, especially if there is no censorship….censorship which often works in their favor. Women don’t like that, one bit. 

The internet, just like most technology, is more suited to men. Men evolved to fight it out, to compete. These instincts do not leave men, once they go online. In fact, they get stronger, in a free online environment. Online, men fight it out, compete for comment dominance. Same with the people that are the most talented you-tubers. Many are men. Men prefer fighting it out directly, but there is no advantage for a woman here. Her pussy power means nothing online. That’s why this fight for internet freedom is so important.

Another thing is privacy. It gives us the ability to express ourselves freely, without worrying about, who will like my comment, who will disagree? Signals for social approval and control, work in a woman’s favor….not in men’s favor. They give women power, over men. Women evolved for social conformity, more than men. Women, more than men, want everyone to think alike, share the same opinion.

That’s why men tend to be more creative than women. The history of creativity is the history of men…not women. That’s why all the great artists are men, and very very few artists and inventors are women. No, there was no vast conspiracy against female genius in history. There was just the sound of silence that came from a lack of female genius. Of course this is a generalization, but it’s still generally true. To any woman with a creative spark in her, I say: you go for it, girl. To all the feminists I say: Women can go for it all they want, but the genders will never be equal in creative power. Nature didn’t intend it to happen. So, as Jordan Peterson put it, we should all support equality of opportunity, but just don’t expect equality of outcome.

By the way, I think Jordan Peterson knows perfectly well, that women are not equal to men, in many ways. Why else do you think he keeps talking about equality of outcome being a bad idea, but equality of opportunity being a good idea? 

Why are things this way? Men evolved to compete for sexual prestige, for their place in the social hierarchy, for access to sex. Women didn’t. Women don’t need to move up the social ladder, to get sex. That wasn’t part of their evolutionary history. Women are the Mothers, men compete for women in evolution…as a general trend, it wasn’t the women viciously competing to get sex from men….it was the men generally competing to get sex from women. And as part of this brutal natural evolutionary equation, men often lose, sexually. That’s why 80% of human females in evolution, they left offspring….but only 40% of human males in evolution left offspring. Women almost always biologically win. Men usually lose, biologically. Men win big more often, but they lose more often too. That’s how the Universe naturally unfolded. That’s why men are more creative than women, as a group. We’re bigger winners than women. Bigger losers, too. That’s why all human progress depends on men, not women. That’s why internet freedom is so important: New ideas involve risk and many studies have shown that risk taking is more common in men, than women. Obviously this propensity has biological roots.  And risk means failure, because most new things don’t work. Most artists are not successful. Most new inventions fail. Most new ideas fail. Most books sell many copies. That’s implicit in the Pareto Principle, it’s implicit in how many symphonies are truly great….not many. And how many business fail….most fail….and how many succeed….few. And the big winners are almost invariably created by men….not women. Creativity and social progress is tied to risk taking, it’s tied to maleness. Males are expendable in evolution….so they biologically are nature’s way of rolling the dice. Women are nature’s conservative bet.. That’s why we males are the gender that comes up with all the new ideas: because most new ideas fail….just like most men fail, biologically. Men usually fail in evolution, but sometimes succeed spectacularly. Feminism won’t change that natural biological pattern. It might however, slow it down. And it sure is giving it a try, as feminism fights to contain male freedom, feminism fights against creativity, feminism fights against freedom of expression…..trying to turn us into a Matriarchy….into a failure.

And the problem for women is this: when men fail, women lose. Let feminism win, women will lose, long term. 

So we need a certain kind of online atmosphere, to keep a vibrant, creative culture alive. America is the most free and creative culture in human history. A few generations back we had covered wagons crossing the Great Plains. Now, going to the Moon is in our rear view mirror…..we are reaching for The Red Planet. We didn’t get this way, by stifling creativity. Free expression is essential, to Keep America Great. Lack of central social control is essential. Lack of a Matriarchy is essential. Anonymity on the internet is essential. If we can keep our online anonymity, we can find out what people truly believe, we are more likely to try out new ideas, because the negative social cost is very low, in being creative in our insights. If feminists are in charge of the internet, we lose all those freedoms. As honest 2nd Wave Feminist Camille Paglia put it, “If women were in charge, we’d still be living in grass huts”.

Here is an extensive list of all the roaring successful Matriarchies in human history:

….ummmm

Women are naturally gyno-centric. They want control of your brain. They want to stop you from expressing your opinions….it’s how they evolved. Only a narrowly defined, pro-feminist point of view, is what is being pushed today, by the feminist elites. This means shutting down male criticism of feminism, post-modernism and all the hate and vile crap being forced down people’s throats at university. That’s what the “hate speech” fight is all about. It’s totally subjective, is what “hate” is. That means women get to define it. By defining it, they hope to neuter men. It’s similar to the recent latest sexual allegation about President Trump. I guess the phony Russia Hoax was getting tired after two years, so they needed a new Rape Hoax to keep the ratings up by promoting social drama, which is a very female driven thing…..”Believe all wahmen”…etc….Controlling your brain means everyone following the same social script, that feminism is supposedly a great idea, and a small group of radical man-haters get to define our culture.

Freedom of Speech and the First Amendment is opposed by feminism. It cannot survive as a cultural reference point, if feminists control political power. Same with the 2nd Amendment…the right to bear arms. Both of those concepts are basically more weighted towards the male part of our population. It’s more common for men to be outspoken, than women. Also, men evolved to protect women, protect their communities. So the right to bear arms, it empowers men, gives them psychological power in a society. It makes a society more masculine. I prefer a culture, where men are strong, government is small and kept in check.  Take the right to free expression away, take away the right to bear arms, it weakens men as a whole.

Feminists have taken control of education and have turned younger males into second rate females……this didn’t work for all males, but it worked on beta males, anyhow….soyboys. Feminists are now….in this internet freedom fight….busy trying to manipulate technologically dominant men at Google, to get them to take your right away, your right to express yourself. Before you fight, figure out the root of this. What’s the root of it? It’s not that women are evil. They are most definitely NOT….not evil at all. Then what? What causes this? These things come out of natural biology. Women are all about keeping everyone safe, as Sandman says, in the top video. Women are more risk averse. They are more about social control and conformity. That’s a deeply embedded biological thing with women. They all flow out of sexual dimorphism in humans. It’s not a social construction, it’s an evolutionary construction and it must be thought about, so we can know how it works, how it affects our culture and it’s trajectory. You have to figure out, how that is playing out in the world, right before our eyes. My guess: We are slowly becoming a Matriarchy, as we speak. That is where all this internet censorship is coming from: female instincts for social control of men. However, it’s not too late to stop it. A group of high school boys in Texas beat the U.S. national women’s soccer team recently. This is quite common in sports. What works in soccer, can work everywhere else, if men get serious about their freedom.

The question for you as a man is: what place do female instincts have, in our social order? What place do male instincts have, in our social order? You must decide that question. 

Many things play into this: For instance: “Playing fair” and “playing nice” is more a female thing as well. Listen to the women in your life, for proof of this. Listen to the men in your life, for proof of this. Listen for patterns. Keep track of this. Do this long enough, you will start to hear the pattern. The pattern of women wanting everything to be fair, wanting everything to be nice. It’s more common in women than men, for biological reasons. You see this in voting patterns all the time. It’s the data, of what all women world wide, what their political choices are and what appeals to them: safety, security, social conformity.

The radical left wing gets a disproportion amount of their political support, from women. And young women in particular. Why is that? Think about it….. My guess is that Jordan Peterson is right in his video at the bottom, there is a deep philosophical and theological battle at work, in this internet freedom fight. My contention is this theological and philosophical battle has a deep biological component at it’s root. It’s about the power balance between maleness and femaleness. Speaking of theology, for me, Christianity was originally a Patriarchy religion, as Islam currently is. Both cater to women, but with men in charge. That old way seemed natural to me. We are losing that.

Things have changed: Christianity has been effectively been sexually neutered, by intellectuals such as Derrida have wages a war on the “phalo-centric” nature of Christianity…as mentioned by Professor Peterson in video at the bottom….meaning feminists are trying to destroy the dominant and male aspects of it. Phalo is just university talk, for “dick”. Feminism is a war on masculinity. And masculinity and religion used to be tied together in Patriarchy, so feminism is a war on male-centered notions in religion, in culture, in theology, in everything. Feminists are coming after your dick, with a knife. 

The theological battle currently taking place, is a fight to see if we turn into a Matriarchy….where men are dominated by women. That’s what the feminists are after: they want women to be above men. That’s unnatural. It will never work. Not in a billion years. However: Will the cucks and feminists win? Allow this, Western Civilization will go straight down the toilet of history, in my opinion. Why do I say that? Because there are no long term successful matriarchies surviving human history or surviving evolution. They don’t work. They go extinct. We as humans have a male-female balance to maintain for sure, it can’t be all men completely dominating. But it’s my contention we must remain a civilization that is more masculine than it is now, or we will perish. Already, men are fleeing universities because feminism has taken over. We are well on the way out, now, as a culture, thanks to feminism. That seems to be what is happening in Europe. Western Civilization is dying, is being supplanted by Islam…..because feminine cultures such as ours, do not last. They die. If the feminists win, we’re dead.

How to fight this? As Jordan Peterson says: Tell the truth….in an open way. 

Speak your truth. 

No censorship. Let everyone tell the truth.