Black Pigeon Speaks looks at the trajectory of America, which seems on a downhill slide and wonders, what’s the problem? Here’s a novel answer.
Women vote. That’s the problem.
….hear me out
One of the big problems in democracy is Massive Government Entitlements, which will eventually bankrupt the country. Look at voting patterns: Women vote more often for parties that promise them….a lot more than men do.
Open borders? Women vote more often for parties that allow open borders. Men? Less so.
There is no inter-generational perspective….says BPS? That inter-generational perspective only happens when couples have a lot of children, so they can dream of a future. The birth rate is low because women go to work instead of having children. The American birth rate for people born here, is at an historic low. So we are a society not of the future, but a naval gazing one, living in the present, cut off from the future. How did this happen? Feminism told women go out and work when you are young. Women listened and aborted the future. Seventy million dead American babies and we wonder why we have no future inter-generational perspective? Women voted. they voted for parties to bring in abortion. Sorry, but that’s what happened.
BPS mentions that today, unlike in JFK’s time, now there are no longer any heroic goals? Heroism is more a male trait….it arises when a culture is more masculine. Men evolved to be heroes, to sacrifice for families, for community, for country. Now movies try to turn women into heroes, which is not what they evolved for. Feminism tells young women that gender roles are a social construct, heroism is a social construct. So they neuter men, tell them not to be heroes, because that would be sexist. So feminism turned us quickly from a light Patriarchy full of heroes and heroic goals….like landing on the Moon….into a woke nation of pussies. Women voted. They took charge of our culture. This is what we get. An end to heroism.
“Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country”?…JFK’s famous line would never, never be said today. People would laugh at it. What changed? That perspective requires a common national identity. Post-modernism, feminism, communism on campus, and endless open borders voted in by women, has ended America as a unified country. We were told “diversity is our strength”. That is mostly a female emotion of compassion. It arises out of female nature, much more than male nature. We let women vote….they vote for open borders and what can America do for me?….of course women vote for what can America can do for me. After all, women evolved to be dependent on men for survival and now we have let them vote, giving them one enormous humongous Sugar Daddy which they control. What did you expect?
The leaders, we pretend, are mostly men. But they must dance to the woman’s tune or they won’t get elected.
Endless government handouts including medical coverage for endless migrants, which will bankrupt the nation? Women vote Democrat far more often than men do. People like to think it is a “liberal” vs “conservative” issue….or “Republican” vs. “Democrat”….I call bs. Look at voting patterns: Women vote for parties that give undocumented immigrants medical care…..which would help bankrupt America. Why did this happen? Women vote.
Why blame only women? I’m not….but they ARE the majority of voters. What they say, goes. Face facts. Women should not vote. It likely has something to do with evolution. Women evolved to look after children, when they are young. Not to hunt. Not to try to be men. Not to be tribal leaders. Men evolved as the sex that led, but we turned political power over to women, when we men gave women the vote. Women didn’t fight for the right to vote. We gave it to them. Men fought for the right to vote. It is detailed in “A History of the English Speaking Peoples”….where Winston Churchill chronicles the 800 year struggle and fight, to give men the vote. Then, once we had it…we gave it to women for free. No struggle, no fight. Just handed to them. Men were the leaders, the providers, the builders, the protectors….for all of human history in every culture. We still are. You see this in invention and taxes: Men build or invent almost everything….even today. Men pay most taxes because most of economic production is done by men. He who built the world, no longer leads it. We gave women the levers of power in democracy, by allowing them the vote.
It’s evolutionary, it’s tribal. Those that put their lives on the line are no longer in charge of the tribe. Those that produce most income are not in charge of the tribe. The sex that is dependent on the other, for their survival, is now in charge of the tribe. The weak control the strong. Feminism tried making women into men. Then they forgot to have enough children to sustain our American future. Now we have no future. Letting women vote was a mistake. You might ask: Why? Are women bad? Not at all. But the reason why, turns out to be a bit oddly seemingly benign: Women evolved as a bit more compassionate than men. A bit more emotional. Less likely to be swayed by rational arguments. Men tend to vote for parties that push protecting territory, the military. Social conditioning? More like evolution. Men evolved to protect, to defend territory, to lead political units. Since women are now in charge of elections, since they are the majority, this tilts the political landscape and outcome just enough to the emotional, to ruin a country, long term….that’s my guess….as to why America may be in decline.
By the way, I don’t “blame” women for all this. I just do not think we humans evolved to have our societies to be run by women. I just think Matriarchies don’t work. That’s why they go extinct in evolution. Don’t blame women. Blame men. We men were dumb enough to give women the vote. Our fault. We men got what we deserve: A mess of a society….a “woke” society of spineless fools, no future, gender confusion, race replacement, complete family breakdown for much of society, social chaos and an unsustainable economic and political system. Don’t be angry against women. Feminists maybe, but they are a small minority of women….who ruined society. Ultimately blame men, though. It’s our fault. We let them. We screwed up, by letting women vote. With great power, comes great responsibility. We gave women great power, without great responsibility. The trouble is, responsibility is about looking after others: Women didn’t really evolve to take care of men. Men evolved to take care of women, like women evolved to take care of children. Women didn’t evolve to protect men. Men evolved to protect women. If we really want women to vote, then when they screw up our society….as they have done…we need to hold them to account, blame them….just like we would a man. That would be a far, far uglier thing than I want. No thanks. They didn’t evolve for their current role. I’d rather just take away their vote.
And I’m not saying that every problem that arose, did so only because women vote. Obviously that’s not true. I’m saying women voting is generally a very, very bad idea….it won’t survive evolution is my guess. It has severe defects….because of evolved group average differentials between males and females…. which eventually destroy any society foolish enough to put women in charge. We are those fools. We have turned our political system into one where men pander and catering to women’s emotionalism. Logic, reason are all dead. Feminism has won. We have ruined America.
Black Pigeon Speaks says in his video:
7:05 “In America and much of the Western World, it looks as though the current form of social and political organization has run it’s course”.
Restore the Patriarchy……Patriarchy Light….I like to call it.
Here is my diagnosis of why our social organization has run it’s course:
In a nutshell: ignorance about the subtleties of evolution.
One of the reasons I dislike feminism is feminists don’t understand simple biology and evolution. And their ignorance of female biology is screwing up society…..and the lives of women.
Ask yourself: Why is there so much immigration?…one of the things de-stabilizing America. Sorry, but too much diversity is not a strength….A little is fine, but we have too much, it’s destabilizing us. Why do we continue with too much immigration?
My answer: There is a baby shortage in advanced countries, because of feminism. Proof: historically low birth rate. We need immigrants because pensions of us boomers are unsustainable without endless immigrants. So in response, we flood the West with Third World Refugees and immigrants to make up for all the children we are not bothering to have, because American women prioritize career over family….
This feminist social pattern goes against biological norms in nature. It’s feminist’s fault….because they set the agenda, the social norms, for women, when it comes to family and career and life priorities.
How feminist views violate evolution:
In a nutshell: women of all races evolved to have children, when women are young. Feminism tells women to work, or go to school when they are young, instead of having kids. Once women work or go to school, they start to economically out-compete many men. This conflicts with evolution.
Evolution has lessons for us: Humans are sexually dimorphic, men are larger and stronger than women and females have long gestation times….9 months. Babies take a long time to raise. Nature’s solution to this: Women evolved for “hyper-gamy”. It means they want to “mate up”….have sex with men who are higher up the social and financial ladder…women do this in order to have the best man, who will stick around, help her raise the baby. So far, so good…
This was no problem for all of evolution….till 100 years ago, when men invented science and the modern world. Then men invented birth control and the modern economy and modern education. And men gave women the vote. This started a trend that led to feminism. This also led to the welfare state, which women voted in, so they could take men’s money without bothering to do anything for him! Men pay most of the taxes, women benefit from most of the tax money.
Women became less directly dependent on men. They for the first time, have very long education periods. The modern world, which lets women work and get an education, this reduces the birth rate because the modern world conflicts with evolution. Here’s how: Females evolved to pursue men that have more resources than they do….hyper-gamy. In the modern world, women spend a lot of time in school, spend a lot of time working, so they start to economically out-compete men….But women are still hyper-gamous: so they don’t desire the men, that they out-compete…… That won’t change….no matter how much false indoctrination people get.
Women working and getting an education means the birth rate drops, because women are busy working and busy studying. The more they work and get educated, the fewer babies they have. Part of the reason for this is that as women rise in the world, they won’t “marry down”….because women evolved for hyper-gamy….they marry up or across. Men evolved differently: Men will “marry down” if she earns less than him. Women won’t. That’s hyper-gamy, in a nutshell.
And what do you call it when women organize and push women to make their own money, compete with men, go to school, use birth control, have abortions? You call that thing…..*feminism.*
So as I see it, feminism is destroying the modern world….especially America. It’s out of whack with nature and with evolution.
The other thing with evolution, sperm evolved to last till the man is dead. Eggs don’t. That’s why men want sex, more than women do. So the male breeding season lasts till a man is dead. For females, there is a very short breeding season. Basically women evolved to have their children, by age 30….then their fertility slows down. Female fertility basically falls off a cliff at age 35. Female eggs last a much shorter time….basically between age 14 and 35….then women are biologically dead, as far as babies is concerned.
Again, all this sets up a conflict between evolution and the modern world we live in:
Since women basically are pushed by feminism and the modern world, to work and go to school and compete with men, and at the same time every woman has a biological clock that is ticking, it means the more women work and go to school, generally the fewer children she will have. Look at birth rates. Britain is dead….thanks feminism. White people in America are dead….thanks feminism. Japan and China are dead…..thanks feminism. All the advanced countries, where women get an education and work….are all dying demographically, because they follow the feminist model in life planning for women….avoid being a Mother….compete with men….work and go to school till you are 30, before having kids. That model is designed to kill a country.
Feminism sets up a social pattern that works against evolution and nature. Over time, that kills a country. Congratulation feminists. You turned America….a great country in 1969, to the one we now have. Time for this foolish little feminist experiment to end.
The solution? For one thing women should be not working and going to school in their 20s. They should be having babies. That’s when nature intended it. Feminism? No thanks. I don’t support cultural suicide….for any nation or race.
Another thing is: Women don’t even want equality. Engineers at Google figured that out. We can reverse engineer female sexual preference…..about what women want…..which comes from evolution…. using their online sexual data to figure this out. That will tell us, give us the evidence, on the shape of sexual evolution for women. In other words, it will tell us what women want. It has already been done. Jordan Peterson explains. Continued below…..
So: what do women want? Finally we can answer Freud’s question:
Women want Billionaires, Surgeons, Pirates, Vampires and Werewolves….according to Google Engineers, who collected data on female sexual interests online. What do these men have in common? They are Apex, very high status males, who have money and dominant energy. In other words, we humans are not wired for equality. Women don’t want equality. Men don’t want equality. We didn’t evolve for it. So why are we shooting for equality as a social goal? Women dream of dominant men. Men dream of being heroes…..Superman. That’s why so many boys read comic books, when I was a boy. Men dream of being heroes because evolution wired them for it. Evolution wired them for it because that’s what women want, that is what works in the male-female evolutionary bond. It’s part of the dynamic of Beauty and the Beast, wound into our DNA. The female half of this duo is the Beauty….the taming of that beast. Not becoming the Beast, as the feminists want. Women should aspire for their genetic role of the Beauty….not the Beast. That’s what works in nature. That’s called “hyper-gamy”….women evolved to “marry up”…Women want: Financially dominant, physically and sexually dominant men…..men higher up than them. Pushing towards that genetic propensity means pushing towards genetic success. Pushing against it, as feminism does, means pushing towards genetic failure. That should give us a clue, what sort of society to construct, so women are happy. Evolution is trying to make women happy, biologically successful. Feminism is pushing ideas that make women unhappy, biologically unsuccessful. Women working and going to school in their 20s and competing with men when they are young, interferes with this normal evolutionary pattern…..because as women compete with men during their sexual prime, as they win…..which they will often do, as women are capable… as they climb higher during this period, this diminishes female long term mating prospects…..reflected in the declining fertility rate. This should teach us some evolutionary lessons: Women are not wired for equality. Neither are men. Why is this so? It’s because women have evolved to sexually reproduce during their 20s….making them utterly dependent on men for all of evolution, for their survival. What works in nature, is women having babies in their 20s, not competing with men. What doesn’t work in nature, is women avoiding having babies in their 20s, and competing with men. The second option, the failed option? That’s feminism, that’s out of whack with evolution, that’s a death sentence for a culture. Yet the ideology of feminism rests on the assumption that equality is supposedly good for the genders. How could that be? It’s not what women want. It’s not what men want. It’s not what nature wants. It’s not how evolution wired us. And more directly: It’s not in keeping with the evolution of female eggs.
So if we construct a society of equality of the sexes…for instance equal pay for men and women….which is the track we are on, we will have a society that women don’t want. Women want inequality. They want dominant men who can protect them, provide for them, while they have offspring, when they are young. This is not exactly rocket science people….it’s amazing I have to say something this obvious….but well I guess I have to: That’s why inequality of the sexes is preferable to equality of the sexes: Because it gives women, what they want. We as a species, men especially, we evolved as gynocentric: men are wired for dominance in order to help and protect women. Placing men in this role aligns the male role with his biological imperative: to protect and help females. The Bible and the story of Adam and Eve, they get this concept, but disguise it. In that story, Eve is the help mate for him. Genesis 2:18 “
“And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.”
Our New social order has to be based on that, based on evolution. Complimentary inequality is wired right into nature. The Bible is the Patriarchy Manual of the Western World. It shows us in narrative form, the social form we must have, to survive. The stories in it arose out of careful observation over many generations, of what worked socially between men and women. What works is some form of Patriarchy. That means putting men ostensibly at the forefront, leading things. But there is a deeper reason that men lead. It’s not about dominance in the sense of being overbearing or controlling or something malicious in intent. Men lead so they can help women. Men lead because women are burdened by nature, with biology that requires a great deal of them. They are the bearers of life, so men compete for them, in order for male life to go on, as well. Women hold the keys to the VIP room. This means that male leadership is an illusion, if you think it’s one dimensional or all about men being selfish. It’s not. Men lead, so they can help women. That’s the genetic and social pattern. Looking at it that way, women are the center of biology, of human life, so overtly men lead, but in biological reality this is an illusion. That male leadership in leading is a competition among men, to secure the female, so they can help her, so that in exchange for male help, the male himself will biologically go on, in nature. So any feminist notions of males leading out of nothing but male selfishness designed to “oppress women”….that narrative is a naive joke…..not in accordance with reality or nature. Men lead in order to sacrifice for women. That’s how reality, how evolution actually works. The story in the Bible of gender roles is a fairy tale containing the truth, which we used to tell men, to make them feel good, in order for them to sacrifice for women. The Bible and evolution are telling us the same thing. That’s because the Biblical narrative was intuitively constructed out of observations about evolution…..long before it was understood in scientific terms. We must be mindful of where this evolutionary plot is going, anyhow….whether we like it, or not: Where this is going, whether we like it or not: In a contest between nature and someone’s concocted errant fantasy about how reality runs……nature will win in the long run, every time. Once we realize this, we may as well understand evolution, understand nature, try to live within it’s norms…..not buck reality. Unless we just want to die off.
Just reverse engineer the meaning of the evolution of sperm and eggs, to figure this out: Sperm lasts till a man gasps his last breath. Eggs only last a very short time. Females get to choose which sperm to use. And women evolved to “mate up” in the Dominance Hierarchy all humans live in….hyper-gamy. Those are the basic rules of reproduction. From them we can reverse engineer the logic and social pattern those grounded scientific facts tell us, about how to arrange our lives. It’s like arguing from first principles in physics. Start with facts you can prove. Then logically argue from there….in order to ascertain as much about biological reality, as you can: Understand the evolution of sperm and eggs. Then we can ask ourselves: in light of the biological rules of sex….especially the short term viability of human eggs….what sort of society would be in keeping with the norms of evolution? Hint: not our feminist one.
Feminists are fools. They don’t understand declining Sexual Value in females, and time. I’m not trying to be cruel when I state this, but biological reality is constructed in nature, so that female value to males is at it’s peak and extraordinarily high, when females are young….basically before age 30. That’s not a nice fact, but it’s true. It’s not about men being mean. It’s about nature….how it’s constructed. Female eggs last a short time in nature, then they decline. This affects a woman’s biological value to men. Nature set things up like this, in order to get men and women to sexually reproduce. We can fight this fact if we like, we can ignore it, at our peril. But fighting this or ignoring it means doing things, which in the long run, hurt women. No thanks. Nature may be cruel in it’s design about this, but what is less cruel is acknowledging this reality, then living within that reality in humans, in order to minimize human suffering. Women that understand this, can work within these rules of nature, these women have better lives. Women who fight this biological reality….like feminists do….inflict massive cruelty upon women. Pain and suffering arises from ignoring these rules of nature. I’d rather listen to nature, to lessen human suffering.
In practical terms what does this mean? Feminists, they are telling women to chase status and education in their 20s…while their Sexual Market Value decreases….because their eggs are getting old. Women chasing status? This only raises women’s standards, as to what they want in a man…while at the same time a women’s Sexual Market Value is declining. It’s like charging more for an orange, the older it gets. Life doesn’t work that way. All this happens within the context of evolved female hyper-gamy…..And hyper-gamy does not disappear just because we have a modern world and women start to work outside the home. As women achieve in life in the modern world, however high women climb, they will still want to “marry up”….and in a world of gender equality that feminists want, this means the more women accomplish by competing with men, the harder her chances of genetic survival becomes…..the unhappier and more genetically unsuccessful she becomes. There is nothing so lonely as a nursery of a 40 year old woman with a PhD. That’s what fighting evolution and time gets a human being, in the long run.
It’s really quite simple: Women evolved to have children in their 20s, not to have careers. Yet feminists make careers the priority for women….destroying their lives….and destroying America in the process. How? As women have careers, there are fewer and fewer men around, for those women, because as women get successful, their demands on men increase. When ‘equality’ is reached, there are far too few men around, to interest the women…who all want a man to be higher in status than they are…women want billionaires and pirates…that’s what the data says. Trust the data.
And one feminist foolish thought after another, that’s what happens, that’s what is destroying America. One abortion after another, one child not being born after another, we go from 1969 and a Man on the Moon…..to a woke and broke culture of SJWs.
So, yes, BPS is right. Our current model of social organization is a mess. It’s done. We need a new model.
Actually, our new model turns out to be a very, very old model, tested hundreds of thousands of times….by every race, every religion, every ethnicity. It works every time:
It’s better to organize a society, with women having children in their 20s, as their main focus….not careers. That’s the successful evolutionary pattern in every culture, every race, every religion, for all time. Doing it that way, women don’t compete against men, when women are young. This makes women look at men more favorably, since she can gain from marrying a man, at that point.
It’s time to ditch our very unsuccessful current evolutionary pattern: feminism
This applies directly to women’s lives, every day. If she competes with men, she waits till she is older and higher in status to mate, men won’t be as interested, there will be fewer men around to interest her and her fertility window will be closing….. All this and more, feminism doesn’t understand. Feminism organizes society against the interests of women, while pretending to organize a society that helps women’s interests. That’s so, so, so cruel. Let’s stop fighting nature. We don’t stand a chance against Mother Nature. Equality doesn’t work. It goes against nature. Men and women evolved to complement each other, not compete against each other.
However, let’s not lose our sense of humor about this: