Something I have been pointing out to people for a while now, which they often seem to ignore, is the fact that white nationalism is often commandeered — not just by Jews — but by people with ulterior motives. Essentially, they seek to gain a following from the growing amount of young, racially-aware white men, and instead steer them toward some other self-serving end under the guise of “saving the white race”.
You see this with Christian fundamentalist types; when you listen to them speak long enough, it becomes obvious that they don’t really care about ethnicity, they just care about “Christianity”. Since they know that Europe was historically the heart of “Christendom”, white men who seek a return to tradition and a classical vision of our society make for good targets for these people to build a following.
The worst offender, however, and the one I detest the most, is the “Manosphere” or Real-Doll Nationalists. The poster boy for this movement is of course Andrew Anglin, who runs by all accounts the most-popular site in WN 2.0. Recently, Andrew penned a piece call “An Intellectual Argument For Abolishing Age of Consent Laws“. Very liberal use of the term “intellectual”, you will notice. His thesis is presented in following section:
Contradiction #1: 75% of American men are fat. That’s 15% more than women. So therefore, men should actually be considered less-competent decision makers by this logic. Notice that he doesn’t even acknowledge this. He also says this:
Men apparently have no control over sexual urges if a woman “throws herself” at him, but we are to believe that they have the capacity to make sound decisions for who women get to have sex with?
Under Anglin’s proposal, if one of those Arabs decides to marry off or pimp out his 10-year-old daughter, that would be acceptable.
Oh, but he’s totally not saying that! Even if that’s the inevitable conclusion of his “intellectual argument”.
We shouldn’t be allowed to have a say in who we have sex with at all, that’s what he’s saying! That’s totally a great basis for society.
Now here’s the thing: I do agree that there should be laws against certain sexual “freedoms” and hedonism and such, and it is true that people generally don’t make a lot of great decisions for themselves, but a society in which men and women are not free to choose their husband or wife is not a good one. Something else these Real-Doll Nationalists don’t seem to understand, probably because many or most of them seem to be “incels”, is: She WILL find a way to leave you. Maybe it’ll be arsenic in your soup, who knows, but she will find a way to leave you if she wants to.
Contradiction #2: “What is acceptable as food, hygiene, or decent human behavior fluctuates so much between locations that it must prove that there is no biological basis for these fluctuations.”
Do you hear how stupid that sounds? Especially when it comes out of the mouth of a supposed “white nationalist” and race realist? I’m sure the fact that Mexicans put their age of consent at 12 couldn’t possibly be related to the fact that everywhere Mexicans go turns into a shithole. Anglin himself basically acknowledged this in a recent article about a Mexican in America who got his 11-year-old cousin pregnant.
Hey, Andrew. Was that male relative sufficient to say who with and at what age his female cousin could have sex?
Of course, most of the clowns in his comment section are eating this “white Sharia” shit up, as usual.
I have maintained that there are core tenets one should have to adhere to in order to be rightfully seen as an ethnonationalist. One cannot be a misogynist and claim to “love the white race”. You cannot claim to love your people and then say that you hate half of them and want them “in cages” while you commit miscegenation with Asian women or something.
It is the job of men to protect and love their women. Not to brutalize and subjugate them. Without loving relationships between men and women, we are nothing. Oh, but Anglin hopes that his viewers are 14 years old and that they will come to understand that men can not and should never love women as it’s all a “hoax” anyway.
You know, there has been the idea floating around for some time, and gaining a lot more traction as of late, that a lot of the men in WN 2.0 are closet homosexuals and I think that there is now more than enough evidence to make a strong case for that. Most of the men with the largest followings are either gay, hate women, or are at least pro-homosexuality and their followers tend to blindly accept and parrot every talking point.
Anglin hates white women more than anything, Fuentes hates women and hangs out with gay “catboys” for 10-hour livestreams, Millennial Woes is popular on the YouTube front and is openly gay, they rallied behind Milo for a while, Richard Spencer actually said this once:
Which is really bizarre and makes no sense whatsoever.
The thing we can learn from all these guys, and indeed from WN 2.0 in general, is that one should not build any sort of following or fanbase around a public figure or business who claims to or is said to be representative of white nationalism — the trend seems to be that they’re all controlled-op, subversive agents.