Let me start with one statement: Nobody should believe anything the media says.
They are reading teleprompters, they do not think about what they say, they just read it out.
The media is totally controlled by the intelligence community. To this fact, even CIA counterintelligence agents testified. Agencies have their personnel inside local and national media overseeing the portrayal and publishing of stories. Aside from people in the media under the control of the intelligence community they also employ the practice of old-fashioned bribes to get what they want from newsrooms and editors. The stories from big names such as FOX, the NYT, Time magazine, CNN, BBC are totally controlled by the intelligence community.
The 10 mail bombs which were allegedly sent to leftist and democrat individuals (Barack Obama, the Clintons), organizations (such as CNN) who are at the forefront of those political groups and also to critics of Donald Trump is a big psychological operation just a week before the November 5 midterm election to set its tone.
If you were a supporter of the Democrats you would see Republicans as ‘domestic terrorists’, criminals, hillbillies, and fascists. Meanwhile, if you were in support of the Republicans you would believe that these mail bombs were most likely sent by the Democrats themselves in order to gain political leverage and to get people to sympathize with them.
To simply put it these mail bombs have been designed to polarize the public.
It is evident that the biggest supporter of the ‘false paradigm’, the ‘left-right divide’ is the media itself. Outside of this Republican-Democrat one-party system pretending to be a two-party system no candidate gets proportional and sufficient airtime or coverage making sure that regular voters will flock to the red or blue side. The media is aiming to prevent individual thinking and spread mindless tribalism instead.
Blue – Red: The False Paradigm
Blue – Red, Democrat – Republican, Crippz – Bloodz, face – inscription, two sides of the very same coin.
It can be best-shown trough a historical example, in this case, it was in post-Yetsin Russia where ex-KGB agent Boris Berezovsky proposed to Russian President Vladimir Putin that the Russian state and the oligarchy should set up an artificial two-party system.
“When Putin became president, I was for a long time in a state of profound naiveté. Well, I went to him … I told him: “Listen, Volodya, what happened: we destroyed the entire political space. Devoured, not destroyed, but devoured it. We absolutely dominated … Look, I’ll suggest that we can not have an effective political system if there’s a tough competition. So I suggest we create an artificial two-party system. So, let’s say, the left and right. A Socially Oriented party and neo-conservatives liberal party. Choose any. And I’ll make another party.” – Boris Berezovsky
Basically, Berezovsky imaged a system for Russia where there would be two major, artifically-created, state- and oligarchy-supported parties, the Democratic Socialist party and Neo-Conservative party. I reckon you see the similarities between the proposed Russian system and the current political system of the U.S. They are essentially working the same way achieving the same goals and objectives.
The goals of the proposed Russian system were to create a fake, artificial facade meant to divert attention from the wrongdoings of the real decision makers inside the government, to make sure that the country and the people can easily be exploited and robbed, and to channel social and political discontent into a fake system designed to change nothing in practice.
The American public hasn’t come to the realization yet that they have a one-party system masquerading as a democracy. The policies of the government of the United States won’t change since factually it doesn’t matter if there is a Republican or Democrat representing the U.S. as the smiling face popularly referred to as ‘president’.
The ‘Police State’ agenda
So far 10 mail bombs were allegedly delivered to different locations by the postal service. They allegedly had the capability to kill or mangle individuals (pipe bombs with shards of glass). The mainstream media could make the case that more mail bombs from the same source or from different sources could be sent via post offices in the future. To what characters and interviewees appearing on camera would be calling for more security checks, video and audio surveillance in post offices, package screening, stricter record keeping, etc. in order to “prevent” and “mitigate” such incidents in the future.
The ‘Domestic Terrorism’ agenda
People from the left and some from the right will be calling out the real or imaginary creators of these mail bombs. Events like these bring out the intended shift of the terrorism agenda from foreign terrorists living in some cave on the other side of the planet to ‘domestic terrorists’. Online ‘extremism’ is also being blamed for these mail bombs. This alleged ‘Extremism’ being used by governments and the media is such a broad definition that it can be anything from verbal dissent against the government to perpetrating major criminal acts.