Africa, in Game Theory Save for later Reblog
Game Theory, Race, and Africa: The world is changing, the world is in turmoil. Will NATO survive? Will Bretton Woods survive? Will America decline? The old order is breaking down. Will China rise and take over the world, from the United States? China is very vulnerable. The Chinese rely on foreign food, foreign minerals and resources and energy, to run a modern economy. Africa is the key, to who will run the world, in the future. The “African Card” may be the Trump card. If I were China, here is how I would play the African Card: Africa is rich in resources that China needs: food, plenty of great land to grow things on, energy, minerals etc. Whites have a long history of colonialism in Africa, whites elites are filled with self-hatred, guilt, that comes from post-modernism and feminism, rampant infections on campus.
However, it is possible to break yourself free of the self imposed, self-hatred of whites, and this is what the left fears: Someone who doesn’t hate other races, but tells the truth about the history of technology and science:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/14/opinion/china-challenges-one-child-brooks/index.html
China does not have the problem of self-hatred and cultural suicide, as whites do. But one problem China has, is too many young men. Far too many. What to do with them? Due to aborting too many female fetuses, a long and horrible cultural practice, over the next few decades, many millions of young Chinese men will grow up, without the prospect of a wife and regular sex. Meanwhile Africa has a very large baby boom, many, many available women who are poor.

And Africa has great need, of Chinese technical help. My guess is, there will be a lot of “Tiger Woods” born in the next few decades. Tiger is half Asian, half black.




China should say to Africans: “We are not here to colonize you, like the white man did. We are here to help you, then go home. Work with us in business, we will both get rich. We will set up enclaves of Chinese, for temporary Chinese workers which you can monitor with us, so they all go home to China, in a few years. They will build up your country, build roads, bridges, schools and hospitals. In exchange you let us mine minerals, extract oil, grow food.“
This would be a very good contrast, to the white foolish immigration policy, whereby the Swedish government it trying to turn Somalis, into Swedes, the American government has put in policies which will turn America from a white majority country, into a white minority country, within a couple more decades. This sort of thing has never worked before and will likely fail. Already we can see America falling apart every day, over race. Just turn on CNN, open your eyes. However, temporary immigration can work for Africa, if the African elites are not the fools, that white elites are, and they have the backbone to send people home. Then you can have the benefits of foreign expertise, without the social unrest that comes from unending population replacement.
I’ll bet this is already, what China is doing, it’s already official Chinese policy, behind the scenes. My guess is, this Chinese policy will work very well, it will help Africa enormously, it will bypass the old world powers like Europe and the United States, will catapult China into global leadership, far out competing the United States, over time. The American economy is largely internal, not relying on outside trade much. China can use Africa for resources, and use Africa for it’s own internal market of sorts, that it can dominate….thereby bypassing it’s own internal weaknesses, while avoiding the foolishness that will likely disable formerly white countries, in a few decades.
For white countries and soon to be formerly white countries, immigration has reached, what is known in economics as “the point of diminishing returns”: San Fransisco, a formerly glorious city, is now becoming …a shit-hole city, as Paul Joseph Watson explained. We have enough white and black American crazy and poor people to deal with. We don’t need more bad immigration choices.
A common thing in business is that the first company into a field, does not always win, in the long run. The first company often does some very foolish mistakes, due to inexperience. Then a later company, a later entry into the market wins, having seen and avoided all the foolish mistakes of the first company. So it will be, with China and formerly European based countries, on immigration. The Chinese, following the Japanese lead, will build a new and revised version of immigration, using technology to benefit it’s mutual partners. The Europeans may never recover, from having an immigration policy in the 21st century, which is essentially set up for the 19th Century. What was once wisdom on the Statue of Liberty, is now foolishness.

“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”
This should be changed to “Send some engineers, some skilled workers. Let’s work together, make money together. Keep your homeless, your poor. We don’t want them, on our shores. They can huddle at home, you should look after them, we have enough people. When your skilled people are finished, in a few years, they can go home. Then you can send some more. We will share skills, share trade, both of us will get rich, then your engineers and skilled workers can go home”
In the 19th Century, North America was empty and European countries were mostly shit-holes, technology was pretty primitive compared to today, so it made sense to welcome the huddled masses. Then we needed unskilled labor, and strong backs with weak minds, were needed. Now? Not so much. That was a different stage in history. Welcoming endless immigration from the Third World countries of today, when skilled labor is what we need, is a recipe for disaster. These lessons are likely lost on our clueless, self-hating white liberal elites, but the Chinese and African elites may have absorbed these lessons already.
You can now go on the internet and buy the Statue of Liberty, for about $40 bucks….and it’s made in China. That seems appropriate, for our age:

Africa has a lower IQ population, with not nearly enough educated people, to run a sophisticated modern economy. China has plenty of smart and educated people. In this arrangement, Africa wins, China wins, the U.S. and Europe lose, the United States loses, because China becomes more independent of the U.S. and Europe, as China rises in importance.
https://linkyou.blog/immigration-in-the-next-100-years/
The liberal white man is too self-absorbed, too guilt ridden, too mentally stuck in the old colonial era, to realize this and respond to the rise of China in Africa. Too bad, because great opportunities are in Africa, and the economic future of the world is being built there.
The good side to this, is you have lots of choice in Chinese food, in Nairobi. When I was there, 30 years ago, I only found one Chinese restaurant. Now there are dozens. I recommend Panda Chinese Restaurant, if you are ever in Nairobi, want to check out the new face of Africa. That’s the good side.
There will be a bad side, to this, for white people: If South Africa erupts in a race war, if whites are eradicated, I’ll guess the Chinese swoop right in there, taking over technical jobs, like running South African nuclear facilities, helping the Africans, in any way they can. Free from the historical baggage of colonialism, the Chinese will be welcome in Africa. I’ll bet the Chinese are patiently working, behind the scenes, to position themselves, in case the whites in South Africa leave or lose all their economic power.
So in short, better Chinese food in Nairobi, possible white genocide in South Africa…..
In a completely ‘unrelated story’, the government of South Africa is preparing a bill, to take away the land of white farmers….As South Park character Officer Barbrady once said, “Move along, nothing to see here….”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5443599/White-South-African-farmers-removed-land.html
Please note that the Daily Mail story in the link, it emphasized
‘We are not calling for the slaughter of white people – at least for now’

There are no comments yet on 'Africa, in Game Theory'